World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James Faulconbridge

James Faulconbridge

Award Badge
Political Science
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 46 322 286 47 44 160 7324

James Faulconbridge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Faulconbridge between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Faulconbridge published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2009. 8 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2009. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Faulconbridge: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 13
2008 14
2009 21
2010 11
2011 12
2012 9
2013 8
2014 8
2015 13
2016 9
2017 8
2018 7
2019 11
2020 8
2021 4
2022 1
2023 1
2024 4
2025 4
Total 172
Download as CSV

James Faulconbridge publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Faulconbridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 156–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 160 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33 160
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

James Faulconbridge D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Faulconbridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17 46
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

James Faulconbridge is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of Social Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting. Their research spans multiple subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems, Transportation, Economics and Econometrics, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

Their work often addresses topics related to Management and Organizational Studies, Digital Economy and Work Transformation, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Urban Transport and Accessibility, Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Transportation Planning and Optimization, and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems.

Recent significant publications by Faulconbridge include:

  • How Professionals Adapt to Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Intertwined Boundary Work, 2023, Journal of Management Studies
  • How professional actions connect and protect, 2021, Journal of Professions and Organization

Other influential papers linked to their research interests, although authored by frequent collaborators, include:

  • How information technology automates and augments processes: Insights from Artificial-Intelligence-based systems in professional service operations, 2022, Journal of Operations Management
  • Studying disruptive events: Innovations in behaviour, opportunities for lower carbon transport policy?, 2020, Transport Policy
  • Theory-Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management, 2024, British Journal of Management

Faulconbridge has had a series of frequent collaborators, notably Martin Spring, Atif Sarwar, Greg Marsden, Jillian Anable, and Daniel Muzio, each of whom has coauthored multiple works with them. This network highlights a collaborative approach to research across diverse domains.

They have published repeatedly in key venues such as the SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of Economic Geography, Journal of Operations Management, Transport Policy, and Journal of Management Studies, indicating a broad engagement with both interdisciplinary and specialized academic communities.

Best Publications

  • Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms

    James R Faulconbridge;Daniel Muzio

  • Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms

    James R. Faulconbridge

  • Professions in a globalizing world: Towards a transnational sociology of the professions:

    James R Faulconbridge;Daniel Muzio

  • Towards corporate professionalization: The case of project management, management consultancy and executive search

    Daniel Muzio;Damian Hodgson;James Faulconbridge;Jonathan V Beaverstock

  • Advanced Producer Service Firms as Strategic Networks, Global Cities as Strategic Places

    Peter J. Taylor;Ben Derudder;Ben Derudder;James R. Faulconbridge;Michael Hoyler

  • Commuting practices: New insights into modal shift from theories of social practice

    Noel Cass;James Faulconbridge

  • International Encyclopedia of Geography

    Jonathan V Beaverstock;Sarah Hall;James Faulconbridge

  • Corporate Ecologies of Business Travel in Professional Service Firms Working Towards a Research Agenda

    James R. Faulconbridge;Jonathan V. Beaverstock;Ben Derudder;Frank Witlox

  • International business travel: some explorations

    Jonathan V. Beaverstock;Ben Derudder;James R. Faulconbridge;Frank Witlox

  • The 'war for talent': The gatekeeper role of executive search firms in elite labour markets

    James R. Faulconbridge;Jonathan V. Beaverstock;Sarah Hall;Andrew Hewitson

  • Global Architects: Learning and Innovation through Communities and Constellations of Practice

    James R Faulconbridge

  • London and Frankfurt in Europe's evolving financial centre network

    James R Faulconbridge

  • The financialization of large law firms: Situated discourses and practices of reorganization

    James R. Faulconbridge;Daniel Muzio

  • Mobility and Professional Networks in Academia: An Exploration of the Obligations of Presence

    Tom Storme;James Faulconbridge;Jonathan V Beaverstock;Ben Derudder

  • Reinserting the professional into the study of globalizing professional service firms: the case of law

    James R. Faulconbridge;Daniel Muzio

  • The Global Professional Service Firm: ‘One Firm’ Models versus (Italian) Distant Institutionalized Practices:

    Daniel Muzio;James Faulconbridge

  • Global professional service firms and the challenge of institutional complexity:‘field relocation’ as a response strategy

    James Faulconbridge;Daniel Muzio

  • Analysing the Changing Landscape of European Financial Centres: The Role of Financial Products and the Case of Amsterdam

    James R. Faulconbridge;Ewald Engelen;Michael Hoyler;Jonathan V. Beaverstock

  • Managing the transnational law firm: a relational analysis of professional systems, embedded actors and time-space sensitive governance.

    James R. Faulconbridge

  • The Regulation of Design in Global Architecture Firms: Embedding and Emplacing Buildings

    James R. Faulconbridge

  • Negotiating cultures of work in transnational law firms

    James R. Faulconbridge

  • Relational networks of knowledge production in transnational law firms

    James R. Faulconbridge

  • New Insights into the Internationalization of Producer Services: Organizational Strategies and Spatial Economies for Global Headhunting Firms

    James R Faulconbridge;Sarah J E Hall;Jonathan V Beaverstock

  • Towards Corporate Professionalization: The Case of Project Management, Management Consultancy and Executive Search

    James Faulconbridge;Daniel Muzio;Damian Hodgson;Jonathan V. Beaverstock

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Muzio
Daniel Muzio University of York
Jonathan V. Beaverstock
Jonathan V. Beaverstock University of Bristol
Ben Derudder
Ben Derudder KU Leuven
Frank Witlox
Frank Witlox Ghent University
Peter J. Taylor
Peter J. Taylor Northumbria University
Michael Hoyler
Michael Hoyler Loughborough University
Graeme Currie
Graeme Currie University of Warwick
Royston Greenwood
Royston Greenwood University of Alberta
Neil M. Coe
Neil M. Coe University of Sydney
Andrew M. Jones
Andrew M. Jones University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science often leads students to consider related disciplines and diverse career opportunities. Those drawn to data analysis, statistics, or policy research might look into a bachelor of mathematics online. This degree can strengthen analytical skills that are highly valuable in government and research roles.

If you’re interested in the management of information or archival work, a library science degree online is an excellent complement to political science studies. Knowledge gained from both fields equips graduates for positions in public libraries, legislative documentation, and academic institutions.

Political Science overlaps extensively with history, making the history degree an appealing alternative. A historical perspective aids in policy development, legal advocacy, and diplomacy, opening doors to a variety of professions in public service.

Finally, students seeking flexibility may benefit from a master's interdisciplinary studies online. This pathway is ideal for tailoring studies to specific interests, blending political science with other specialties for careers in advocacy, education, and non-profit management.

Best Scientists Citing James Faulconbridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles