World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
5980
World Ranking
7325
National Ranking
357

Viktor Vafeiadis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Viktor Vafeiadis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Viktor Vafeiadis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Viktor Vafeiadis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Viktor Vafeiadis is affiliated with the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with a notable emphasis on subfields such as Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The main topics covered in Viktor Vafeiadis's research include:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques

Vafeiadis has published extensively in renowned venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Artifact Digital Object Group

Their recent papers demonstrate active contributions to topics in programming languages, persistency, and formal semantics. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Truly stateless, optimal dynamic partial order reduction", 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "PerSeVerE: persistency semantics for verification under ext4", 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Extending Intel-x86 consistency and persistency: formalising the semantics of Intel-x86 memory types and non-temporal stores", 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Persistent Owicki-Gries reasoning: a program logic for reasoning about persistent programs on Intel-x86", 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Acute: High-level programming language design for distributed computation Design rationale and language definition", 2021, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Vafeiadis collaborates frequently with several researchers, with notable co-authors being:

  • Michalis Kokologiannakis
  • Azalea Raad
  • Iason Marmanis
  • Ori Lahav
  • Anton Podkopaev

Best Publications

  • A marriage of rely/guarantee and separation logic

    Viktor Vafeiadis;Matthew Parkinson

  • Concurrent abstract predicates

    Thomas Dinsdale-Young;Mike Dodds;Philippa Gardner;Matthew J. Parkinson

  • Modular fine-grained concurrency verification

    Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Repairing sequential consistency in C/C++11

    Ori Lahav;Viktor Vafeiadis;Jeehoon Kang;Chung-Kil Hur

  • A promising semantics for relaxed-memory concurrency

    Jeehoon Kang;Chung-Kil Hur;Ori Lahav;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • CompCertTSO: A Verified Compiler for Relaxed-Memory Concurrency

    Jaroslav Ševčík;Viktor Vafeiadis;Francesco Zappa Nardelli;Suresh Jagannathan

  • Relaxed separation logic: a program logic for C11 concurrency

    Viktor Vafeiadis;Chinmay Narayan

  • Automatically proving linearizability

    Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Deny-Guarantee Reasoning

    Mike Dodds;Xinyu Feng;Matthew Parkinson;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Effective Stateless Model Checking for C/C++ Concurrency

    Michalis Kokologiannakis;Ori Lahav;Konstantinos Sagonas;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • GPS: navigating weak memory with ghosts, protocols, and separation

    Aaron Turon;Viktor Vafeiadis;Derek Dreyer

  • The power of parameterization in coinductive proof

    Chung-Kil Hur;Georg Neis;Derek Dreyer;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Proving correctness of highly-concurrent linearisable objects

    Viktor Vafeiadis;Maurice Herlihy;Tony Hoare;Marc Shapiro

  • Common Compiler Optimisations are Invalid in the C11 Memory Model and what we can do about it

    Viktor Vafeiadis;Thibaut Balabonski;Soham Chakraborty;Robin Morisset

  • Taming release-acquire consistency

    Ori Lahav;Nick Giannarakis;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Strong Logic for Weak Memory: Reasoning About Release-Acquire Consistency in Iris

    Jan-Oliver Kaiser;Hoang-Hai Dang;Derek Dreyer;Ori Lahav

  • Pilsner: a compositionally verified compiler for a higher-order imperative language

    Georg Neis;Chung-Kil Hur;Jan-Oliver Kaiser;Craig McLaughlin

  • Relaxed-memory concurrency and verified compilation

    Jaroslav Ŝevčik;Viktor Vafeiadis;Francesco Zappa Nardelli;Suresh Jagannathan

  • Owicki-Gries Reasoning for Weak Memory Models

    Ori Lahav;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Proving that non-blocking algorithms don't block

    Alexey Gotsman;Byron Cook;Matthew Parkinson;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Modular safety checking for fine-grained concurrency

    Cristiano Calcagno;Matthew Parkinson;Viktor Vafeiadis

  • Shape-Value Abstraction for Verifying Linearizability

    Viktor Vafeiadis

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek Dreyer
Derek Dreyer Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Peter Sewell
Peter Sewell University of Cambridge
Marc Shapiro
Marc Shapiro Sorbonne University
Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Byron Cook
Byron Cook Amazon (United States)
Suresh Jagannathan
Suresh Jagannathan Purdue University West Lafayette
Rupak Majumdar
Rupak Majumdar Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Haibo Chen
Haibo Chen Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Johannes Gehrke
Johannes Gehrke Microsoft (United States)
Maurice Herlihy
Maurice Herlihy Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is an excellent way to broaden your career prospects in computer science and related fields. Many professionals are now turning to online emba programs to gain management skills that complement their technical expertise, opening doors to leadership roles in tech organizations.

If you’re interested in data management, information systems, or supporting digital learning environments, pursuing a library degree online can diversify your options. These programs equip graduates to thrive in academic, public, or corporate libraries increasingly using advanced technology.

For those wanting an affordable path to advanced credentials, there are numerous cheap online master's programs available. These flexible degrees can enhance your technical skillset or allow you to pivot into new areas, such as cybersecurity or software engineering.

Finally, tech professionals with aspirations to drive organizational change may consider an online doctorate leadership. These programs focus on high-level strategy, innovation, and team management in today’s digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Viktor Vafeiadis

Trending Scientists