World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 50 5664 5504 748 743 202 9012

Haibo Chen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Haibo Chen between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Haibo Chen published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 14.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2025. 53 of the 283 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2025. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 30 publications
2006 2025

283 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Haibo Chen: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 5
2008 4
2009 2
2010 3
2011 12
2012 11
2013 11
2014 9
2015 17
2016 15
2017 18
2018 15
2019 18
2020 14
2021 24
2022 22
2023 29
2024 23
2025 30
Total 283
Download as CSV

Haibo Chen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haibo Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 202
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Haibo Chen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haibo Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 50
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2015 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Haibo Chen is affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, with a primary research focus in Computer Science. Their scholarly contributions encompass a broad spectrum of subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Software, and Hardware and Architecture.

The scientist's work addresses topics such as Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance, Advanced Data Storage Technologies, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Security and Verification in Computing, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, and Cloud Data Security Solutions.

Frequent publication venues for Haibo Chen include arXiv (Cornell University) with 23 publications, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems with 7 publications, IEEE Transactions on Computers with 6 publications, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data with 3 publications, and the Journal of Computer Science and Technology, also with 3 publications.

Haibo Chen's recent papers include:

  • DNA-based programmable gate arrays for general-purpose DNA computing, 2023, Nature
  • <scp>XStore</scp>: Fast RDMA-Based Ordered Key-Value Store Using Remote Learned Cache, 2021, ACM Transactions on Storage
  • WeTune: Automatic Discovery and Verification of Query Rewrite Rules, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data
  • TZ-Container: protecting container from untrusted OS with ARM TrustZone, 2021, Science China Information Sciences
  • Ad Hoc Transactions in Web Applications: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data

Collaborations with other researchers have been frequently noted with Binyu Zang, Zhaoguo Wang, Yubin Xia, Xingda Wei, and Haibing Guan.

Haibo Chen has been recognized with professional memberships including ACM Distinguished Member in 2019 and ACM Senior Member in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Corey: an operating system for many cores

    Silas Boyd-Wickizer;Haibo Chen;Rong Chen;Yandong Mao

  • CloudVisor: retrofitting protection of virtual machines in multi-tenant cloud with nested virtualization

    Fengzhe Zhang;Jin Chen;Haibo Chen;Binyu Zang

  • PowerLyra: Differentiated Graph Computation and Partitioning on Skewed Graphs

    Rong Chen;Jiaxin Shi;Yanzhe Chen;Binyu Zang

  • PowerLyra: differentiated graph computation and partitioning on skewed graphs

    Rong Chen;Jiaxin Shi;Yanzhe Chen;Haibo Chen

  • Fast in-memory transaction processing using RDMA and HTM

    Xingda Wei;Jiaxin Shi;Yanzhe Chen;Rong Chen

  • CFIMon: Detecting violation of control flow integrity using performance counters

    Yubin Xia;Yutao Liu;Haibo Chen;Binyu Zang

  • Catalyzer: Sub-millisecond Startup for Serverless Computing with Initialization-less Booting

    Dong Du;Tianyi Yu;Yubin Xia;Binyu Zang

  • NUMA-aware graph-structured analytics

    Kaiyuan Zhang;Rong Chen;Haibo Chen

  • Limiting cache-based side-channel in multi-tenant cloud using dynamic page coloring

    Jicheng Shi;Xiang Song;Haibo Chen;Binyu Zang

  • POLUS: A POwerful Live Updating System

    Haibo Chen;Jie Yu;Rong Chen;Binyu Zang

  • Thwarting Memory Disclosure with Efficient Hypervisor-enforced Intra-domain Isolation

    Yutao Liu;Tianyu Zhou;Kexin Chen;Haibo Chen

  • Tiled-MapReduce: optimizing resource usages of data-parallel applications on multicore with tiling

    Rong Chen;Haibo Chen;Binyu Zang

  • Characterizing serverless platforms with serverlessbench

    Tianyi Yu;Qingyuan Liu;Dong Du;Yubin Xia

  • ShadowEth: Private Smart Contract on Public Blockchain

    Rui Yuan;Yu-Bin Xia;Hai-Bo Chen;Bin-Yu Zang

  • Fast and general distributed transactions using RDMA and HTM

    Yanzhe Chen;Xingda Wei;Jiaxin Shi;Rong Chen

  • Live updating operating systems using virtualization

    Haibo Chen;Rong Chen;Fengzhe Zhang;Binyu Zang

  • SYNC or ASYNC: time to fuse for distributed graph-parallel computation

    Chenning Xie;Rong Chen;Haibing Guan;Binyu Zang

  • Efficient and Available In-Memory KV-Store with Hybrid Erasure Coding and Replication

    Haibo Chen;Heng Zhang;Mingkai Dong;Zhaoguo Wang

  • Using restricted transactional memory to build a scalable in-memory database

    Zhaoguo Wang;Hao Qian;Jinyang Li;Haibo Chen

  • AdAttester: Secure Online Mobile Advertisement Attestation Using TrustZone

    Wenhao Li;Haibo Li;Haibo Chen;Yubin Xia

  • Deconstructing RDMA-enabled distributed transactions: hybrid is better

    Xingda Wei;Zhiyuan Dong;Rong Chen;Haibo Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Binyu Zang
Binyu Zang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Haibing Guan
Haibing Guan Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Pen-Chung Yew
Pen-Chung Yew University of Minnesota
Jinyang Li
Jinyang Li New York University
Xin Wang
Xin Wang Fudan University
Xiaofeng Wang
Xiaofeng Wang Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Tianshi Chen
Tianshi Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zheng Zhang
Zheng Zhang New York University Shanghai
Viktor Vafeiadis
Viktor Vafeiadis Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Francis C. M. Lau
Francis C. M. Lau Hong Kong Polytechnic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Computer Science studies in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider. For those focused on cost, earning the cheapest data science degree can be a practical alternative with strong job prospects. Similarly, aspiring engineers can benefit greatly by enrolling in one of the best online electrical engineering programs USA, which offer high-quality courses with flexible learning options.

Short-term programs are another great option for quickly entering the tech workforce. Consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well, which can lead to lucrative roles in fields like IT support, project management, or cloud computing. If you’re looking to accelerate your education at the graduate level, check out the quickest cheapest masters degree options. Fast-tracked master's programs can help you advance your career and start earning sooner.

Exploring these options can help you find the perfect fit for your goals and budget while positioning you for success in the rapidly evolving tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Haibo Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles