World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 76 204 189 99 91 375 27142
Computer Science 88 673 653 360 349 491 35755

Jay F. Nunamaker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jay F. Nunamaker between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jay F. Nunamaker published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 1989. 5 of the 512 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 1989. 1971: 3 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 6 publications 1974: 8 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 28 publications 1990: 22 publications 1991: 21 publications 1992: 26 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1971 2025

512 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jay F. Nunamaker: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 3
1972 1
1973 6
1974 8
1975 2
1976 1
1977 3
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 1
1982 3
1983 3
1984 3
1985 2
1986 8
1987 9
1988 14
1989 28
1990 22
1991 21
1992 26
1993 10
1994 6
1995 9
1996 8
1997 18
1998 14
1999 21
2000 8
2001 10
2002 15
2003 19
2004 27
2005 24
2006 13
2007 14
2008 10
2009 6
2010 18
2011 10
2012 11
2013 14
2014 8
2015 8
2016 8
2017 5
2018 4
2019 3
2020 4
2021 8
2022 0
2023 6
2024 4
2025 1
Total 512
Download as CSV

Jay F. Nunamaker publications per year - data summary

  • Jay F. Nunamaker, a Business and Management scholar from University of Arizona, has 512 publications recorded across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1971 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 1989, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1972, 1976, 1978, 1981 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 55 years in the span carry no publications at all (1979 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.7 per year counting only the 53 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 19 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1971-1989: 99 publications (5.2 per year); 1990-2008: 295 publications (15.5 per year); 2009-2025: 118 publications (6.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jay F. Nunamaker publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay F. Nunamaker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 375–379 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 375 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8 375
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jay F. Nunamaker publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Jay F. Nunamaker, a Business and Management scholar from University of Arizona, records 375 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Jay F. Nunamaker, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Jay F. Nunamaker ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Jay F. Nunamaker D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay F. Nunamaker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13 76
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Jay F. Nunamaker D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Jay F. Nunamaker, a Business and Management scholar from University of Arizona, records 76 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Jay F. Nunamaker, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Jay F. Nunamaker ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United States Leader Award

Overview

Jay F. Nunamaker is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with a notable focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Demography.

The body of work by Nunamaker mainly addresses topics such as deception detection and forensic psychology, information and cyber security, misinformation and its impacts, social and intergroup psychology, spam and phishing detection, context-aware activity recognition systems, and technology use by older adults.

They have published extensively in several scholarly venues, most prominently:

  • Journal of Management Information Systems (6 publications)
  • Decision Support Systems (2 publications)
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2 publications)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (1 publication)
  • Frontiers in Psychology (1 publication)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jay F. Nunamaker include:

  • Semi-Supervised Cyber Threat Identification in Dark Net Markets: A Transductive and Deep Learning Approach, 2020, Journal of Management Information Systems
  • Human Identification for Activities of Daily Living: A Deep Transfer Learning Approach, 2020, Journal of Management Information Systems
  • Deep Learning for Information Systems Research, 2023, Journal of Management Information Systems
  • Mitigating the Security Intention-Behavior Gap: The Moderating Role of Required Effort on the Intention-Behavior Relationship, 2021, Journal of the Association for Information Systems
  • Fall Detection with Wearable Sensors: A Hierarchical Attention-based Convolutional Neural Network Approach, 2021, Journal of Management Information Systems

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Judee K. Burgoon, Norah E. Dunbar, Xinran Wang, Xunyu Chen, and Miriam J. Metzger.

In addition to journal articles, Jay F. Nunamaker has contributed to book publications, including a title published by IntechOpen titled The Psychology of Trust (2021).

Best Publications

  • Electronic meeting systems

    J. F. Nunamaker;Alan R. Dennis;Joseph S. Valacich;Douglas Vogel

  • Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness

    Dongsong Zhang;Lina Zhou;Robert O. Briggs;Jay F. Nunamaker

  • Can e-learning replace classroom learning?

    Dongsong Zhang;J. Leon Zhao;Lina Zhou;Jay F. Nunamaker

  • Systems development in information systems research

    J.F. Nunamaker;M. Chen

  • Information technology to support electronic meetings

    Alan R. Dennis;Joey F. George;Len M. Jessup;Jay F. Nunamaker

  • ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE

    R. Brent Gallupe;Alan R. Dennis;William H. Cooper;Joseph S. Valacich

  • Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings

    Jay F. Nunamaker;Robert O. Briggs;Robert O. Briggs;Daniel D. Mittleman;Daniel D. Mittleman;Douglas R. Vogel;Douglas R. Vogel

  • Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems

    Robert O. Briggs;Robert O. Briggs;Gert-Jan De Vreede;Jay F. Nunamaker

  • Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

    J. Nunamaker

  • Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology

    Dongsong Zhang;Jay F. Nunamaker

  • Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication

    Lina Zhou;Judee K. Burgoon;Jay F. Nunamaker;Doug Twitchell

  • Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group decision support system

    Jay F. Nunamaker;Lynda M. Applegate;Benn R. Konsynski

  • Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems

    Heikki Topi;Kate M. Kaiser;Janice C. Sipior;Joseph S. Valacich

  • A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support

    Joey F. George;George K. Easton;Jay F. Nunamaker;Gregory B. Northcraft

  • Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation:

    Joseph S. Valacich;Alan R. Dennis;J. F. Nunamaker

  • Computer-aided deliberation: model management and group decision support

    J. F. Nunamaker;Lynda M. Applegate;Benn R. Konsynski

  • A Comparison of Classification Methods for Predicting Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication

    Lina Zhou;Judee K. Burgoon;Douglas P. Twitchell;Tiantian Qin

  • Implementing electronic meeting systems at IBM: lessons learned and success factors

    Ron Grohowski;Chris McGoff;Doug Vogel;Ben Martz

  • Embodied Conversational Agent-Based Kiosk for Automated Interviewing

    Jay Nunamaker;Douglas Derrick;Aaron Elkins;Judee Burgoon

  • Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain

    J. F. Nunamaker;Alan R. Dennis;Joseph S. Valacich;Douglas R. Vogel

  • A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems

    Alan R. Dennis;Jay F. Nunamaker;Douglas R. Vogel

Frequent Co-Authors

Judee K. Burgoon
Judee K. Burgoon University of Arizona
Robert O. Briggs
Robert O. Briggs San Diego State University
Benn R. Konsynski
Benn R. Konsynski Emory University
Joey F. George
Joey F. George Iowa State University
Alan R. Dennis
Alan R. Dennis Indiana University
Douglas R. Vogel
Douglas R. Vogel Harbin Institute of Technology
Joseph S. Valacich
Joseph S. Valacich University of Arizona
Hsinchun Chen
Hsinchun Chen University of Arizona
Paul Benjamin Lowry
Paul Benjamin Lowry Virginia Tech
Andrew B. Whinston
Andrew B. Whinston The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management in the USA opens doors to many related fields and career opportunities. Today, online education makes it even easier to specialize in high-demand areas while balancing other commitments.

For example, many students opt for a healthcare administration degree online to launch careers in the fast-growing healthcare sector. Those seeking leadership roles in hospitals or health organizations may consider advancing to a healthcare administration masters for even greater opportunities and salary potential.

Finance-minded students may look for the cost of accounting degree to compare options and identify the most affordable programs for entering this essential field.

Tech-focused business professionals can explore the best online master’s in artificial intelligence to tap into one of today’s top emerging career paths. Each of these degrees offers unique advantages and pathways for a thriving business career in a quickly evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jay F. Nunamaker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles