World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
44
Citations
11700
World Ranking
1338
National Ranking
568

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
11561
World Ranking
7812
National Ranking
3381

Robert P. Bostrom publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert P. Bostrom sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 127 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Robert P. Bostrom D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert P. Bostrom sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert P. Bostrom is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. The scholar's career is situated within an academic environment noted for diverse research activities across multiple disciplines.

While recent publications, co-authors, and detailed bibliometric data on Robert P. Bostrom's work are not provided, the affiliation with a major research university suggests engagement in scholarly activities consistent with higher education and research standards.

No specific information is available regarding the primary fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research covered by this academic. Similarly, data on publication venues and book publications have not been documented in this profile.

There are no recorded awards associated with Robert P. Bostrom, and the current data indicates that the individual is actively living.

The existing information offers a framework centered on institutional affiliation but does not include further details on research contributions, collaborations, or notable academic outputs.

Best Publications

  • MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause

    Robert P. Bostrom;J. Stephen Heinen

  • The importance of learning style in end-user training

    Robert P. Bostrom;Lorne Olfman;Maung K. Sein

  • Managerial coaching behaviors in learning organizations

    Andrea D. Ellinger;Robert P. Bostrom

  • MIS Problems and failures a socio-technical perspective part II: the application of socio-technical theory

    Robert P. Bostrom;J. Stephen Heinen

  • Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems

    Robert Bostrom;Robert Anson;Vikki Clawson

  • Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support systems use

    Abhijit Gopal;Robert P. Bostrom;Wynne W. Chin

  • Managers as facilitators of learning in learning organizations

    Andrea D. Ellinger;Karen E. Watkins;Robert P. Bostrom

  • Training end users: an experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods

    Sid A. Davis;Robert P. Bostrom

  • Comparing representations with relational and EER models

    D. Batra;J. A. Hoffler;R. P. Bostrom

  • An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes

    Robert Anson;Robert Bostrom;Bayard Wynne

  • Building Trust and Cooperation through Technology Adaptation in Virtual Teams: Empirical Field Evidence

    Dominic Thomas;Robert Bostrom

  • An Examination of Managers' Beliefs about their Roles as Facilitators of Learning

    Andrea D. Ellinger;Robert P. Bostrom

  • A longitudinal study of the impact of group decision support systems on group development

    Laku Chidambaram;Robert P. Bostrom;Bayard E. Wynne

  • Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users

    Maung K. Sein;Robert P. Bostrom

  • The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings:

    Victoria K. Clawson;Robert P. Bostrom;Rob Anson

  • Successful application of communication techniques to improve the systems development process

    R. P. Bostrom

  • End-user training methods: what we know, need to know

    Saurabh Gupta;Robert P. Bostrom;Mark Huber

  • Personality characteristics of MIS project teams: an empirical study and action-research design

    Kate M. Kaiser;Robert P. Bostrom

  • Rethinking end-user training strategy: applying a hierarchical knowledge-level model

    Maung K. Sein;Robert P. Bostrom;Lorne Olfman

  • A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems

    Robert Bostrom;Saurabh Gupta;Dominic Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorne Olfman
Lorne Olfman Claremont Graduate University
Andrea D. Ellinger
Andrea D. Ellinger The University of Texas at Tyler
Richard T. Watson
Richard T. Watson University of Georgia
Karen E. Watkins
Karen E. Watkins University of Georgia
Douglas R. Vogel
Douglas R. Vogel Harbin Institute of Technology
Amit P. Sheth
Amit P. Sheth University of South Carolina
Jorge Cardoso
Jorge Cardoso University of Coimbra
Wynne W. Chin
Wynne W. Chin University of Houston
Ephraim R. McLean
Ephraim R. McLean Georgia State University
Carol Saunders
Carol Saunders University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Business and Management can open doors to a wide variety of career opportunities. Many students seek flexibility and affordability, making affordable masters degrees an attractive path for advancing skills in areas like leadership, analytics, and management.

For those interested in the growing field of data-driven decision-making, pursuing one of the best data science programs can provide expertise in analytics and business intelligence, which are in high demand across industries.

Ambitious professionals looking to reach the highest levels of organizational influence may consider a doctorate organizational leadership degree. This credential can qualify you for senior executive, academic, or consulting roles focused on organizational strategy and innovation.

When selecting an online program, it’s crucial to make sure your degree comes from one of the accredited online universities. Accreditation ensures educational quality and can impact career prospects, licensure, and further study.

Best Scientists Citing Robert P. Bostrom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles