World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
7255
World Ranking
13858
National Ranking
5507

Lorne Olfman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorne Olfman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lorne Olfman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorne Olfman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorne Olfman is affiliated with Claremont Graduate University in the United States. Their primary focus is within the field of Computer Science, contributing to areas such as Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Education, Physiology, and Management Information Systems.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics including:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence

Recent notable publications include:

  • "A Tailored Motivational Messages Library for a Mobile Health Sleep Behavior Change Support System to Promote Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use Among Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Development, Content Validation, and Testing" (2020) published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Quantum Computing and IS - Harnessing the Opportunities of Emerging Technologies" (2023) published in Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • "Identifying a Gap in the Project Management Approach of the Online Program Management and University Partnership Business Model" (2022) published in Online Learning
  • "An Algorithm for Generating Gap-Fill Multiple Choice Questions of an Expert System" (2022) published in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • "DRT: A Novel Tool for Data Archiving" (2020) published in IEEE Software

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lorne Olfman include:

  • Pornpat Sirithumgul
  • Pimpaka Prasertsilp
  • Kevin Williams
  • Wallace Chipidza
  • Yan Li

The primary venues where their work has been published are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Software
  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • Online Learning

Best Publications

  • The importance of learning style in end-user training

    Robert P. Bostrom;Lorne Olfman;Maung K. Sein

  • A Model of Knowledge Management Success

    Murray E. Jennex;Lorne Olfman

  • Assessing Knowledge Management Success

    Murray E. Jennex;Lorne Olfman

  • Designing Knowledge Management Systems for Teaching and Learning with Wiki Technology

    Murali Raman;Terry Ryan;Lorne Olfman

  • Assessing knowledge management success/effectiveness models

    M.E. Jennex;L. Olfman

  • Organizational memory/knowledge effects on productivity, a longitudinal study

    M.E. Jennex;L. Olfman

  • Rethinking end-user training strategy: applying a hierarchical knowledge-level model

    Maung K. Sein;Robert P. Bostrom;Lorne Olfman

  • Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments

    Rosemary Kim;Lorne Olfman;Terry Ryan;Evren Eryilmaz

  • What do groups need? A proposed set of generic groupware requirements

    Munir Mandviwalla;Lorne Olfman

  • End-user training and learning

    Deborah Compeau;Lorne Olfman;Maung Sein;Jane Webster

  • Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge sharing systems

    Kamla Ali Al-Busaidi;Lorne Olfman

  • Training End Users To Compute: Cognitive, Motivational And Social Issues

    Maung Sein;Robert Bostrom;Lorne Olfman

  • Conceptual versus procedural software training for graphical user interfaces: a longitudinal field experiment

    Lorne Olfman;Munir Mandviwalla

  • Rethinking end-user training strategy: applying a hierarchical knowledge-level model

    Maung K. Sein;Robert P. Bostrom;Lorne Olfman

  • End‐user software training: an experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation

    Lorne Olfman;Robert P. Bostrom

  • Visualization ability as a predictor of user learning success

    Maung K. Sein;Lorne Olfman;Robert P. Bostrom;Sidney A. Davis

  • A Knowledge Management Success Model: An Extension of DeLone and McLean's IS Success Model

    Murray E. Jennex;Lorne Olfman

  • What Every Business Student Needs to Know About Information Systems

    Blake Ives;Joseph S. Valacich;Richard T. Watson;Robert W. Zmud

  • An Investigation of the Determinants of Knowledge Management Systems Success in Omani Organizations

    Kamla Ali Al-Busaidi;Lorne Olfman

  • User interface consistency across end-user applications: the effects on mental models

    John W. Satzinger;Lorne Olfman

  • An organizational memory information systems success model: an extension of DeLone and McLean's I/S success model

    M. Jennex;L. Olfman;P. Panthawi;Yong-Tae Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Bostrom
Robert P. Bostrom University of Georgia
Murray E. Jennex
Murray E. Jennex West Texas A&M University
Gondy Leroy
Gondy Leroy University of Arizona
Magid Igbaria
Magid Igbaria Claremont Graduate University
Jane Webster
Jane Webster Queen's University
Joseph S. Valacich
Joseph S. Valacich University of Arizona
Fred D. Davis
Fred D. Davis Texas Tech University
Ron Weber
Ron Weber Monash University
Ephraim R. McLean
Ephraim R. McLean Georgia State University
Joey F. George
Joey F. George Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your computer science education in the USA opens many doors across tech fields. Data science degrees are an excellent choice for those interested in big data and analytics, offering strong job market growth and high earning potential.

For students seeking flexibility, pursuing an electrical engineering degree online admissions process makes it easier than ever to earn a top credential remotely, leading to careers in everything from robotics to telecommunications.

If you’re looking for a quicker path to employment or advancement, consider certifications that pay well. These programs often take just a few months and can significantly boost your qualifications in specialized areas such as cloud computing, cybersecurity, or software development.

Time is also a factor for many. Explore the quickest masters degree online programs to accelerate your career change or progression. Many universities now offer fast-track options that balance speed with in-depth, industry-relevant education.

Best Scientists Citing Lorne Olfman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles