World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
43
Citations
13781
World Ranking
1396
National Ranking
591

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
43
Citations
13783
World Ranking
5993
National Ranking
1661

William J. Doll publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Doll sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 69 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

William J. Doll D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Doll sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Doll is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their academic and research profile is primarily based on this institution, where they have contributed to various scientific activities.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or frequent publication venues are listed for William J. Doll. Similarly, there is no available data on book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study.

As no information on main fields of study, subfields, or explicit topics of research is provided, there is no detailed record of their scientific focus areas.

There is no mention of any awards or honors associated with William J. Doll.

The absence of data on publications, collaborations, and research topics indicates that a more comprehensive profile would require additional information from other sources or future updates.

Best Publications

  • The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction

    William J. Doll;Gholamreza Torkzadeh

  • A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument

    William J. Doll;Weidong Xia;Gholamreza Torkzadeh

  • Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis

    William J. Doll;Anthony Hendrickson;Xiaodong Deng

  • The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work

    G Torkzadeh;W.J Doll

  • Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context

    William J. Doll;Gholamreza Torkzadeh

  • A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement

    William J. Doll;G. Torkzadeh

  • Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: the effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy

    Xenophon A. Koufteros;Mark A. Vonderembse;William J. Doll

  • Concurrent engineering and its consequences

    Xenophon Koufteros;Mark Vonderembse;William Doll

  • The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: a causal model

    Unknown

  • Research Report---A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the User Information Satisfaction Instrument

    William J. Doll;T. S. Raghunathan;Jeen-Su Lim;Yash P. Gupta

  • The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues

    William J. Doll;Gholamreza Torkzadeh

  • The Meaning and Measurement of User Satisfaction: A Multigroup Invariance Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument

    William J. Doll;Xiaodong Deng;T. S. Raghunathan;Gholamreza Torkzadeh

  • Avenues for top management involvement in successful MIS development

    William J. Doll

  • Developing measures of time-based manufacturing

    Xenophon A. Koufteros;Mark A. Vonderembse;William J. Doll

  • Knowledge sharing in integrated product development

    Paul Hong;William J. Doll;Abraham Y. Nahm;Xiao Li

  • Examining the Competitive Capabilities of Manufacturing Firms

    Xenophon A. Koufteros;Mark A. Vonderembse;William J. Doll

  • A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: an illustration using the technology acceptance model

    Xiaodong Deng;William J. Doll;Anthony R. Hendrickson;Joseph A. Scazzero

  • The evolution of manufacturing systems: Towards the post-industrial enterprise

    WJ Doll;MA Vonderembse

  • Test‐Retest Reliability of the End‐User Computing Satisfaction Instrument

    Gholamreza Torkzadeh;William J. Doll

  • Computer Self-Efficacy in an Ongoing Use Context

    Xiaodong Deng;William J. Doll;Dothang Truong

  • The role of project target clarity in an uncertain project environment

    Paul Hong;Abraham Y. Nahm;William J. Doll

  • Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development proejcts: An empirical study

    Paul Hong;William J. Doll;Elena Revilla;Abraham Y. Nahm

  • The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system

    Yun Zheng;Jianfeng Wang;William J. Doll;Xiaodong Deng

Frequent Co-Authors

Gholamreza Torkzadeh
Gholamreza Torkzadeh University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Paul Hong
Paul Hong University of Toledo
Mark A. Vonderembse
Mark A. Vonderembse University of Toledo
Xenophon Koufteros
Xenophon Koufteros Texas A&M University
Fred D. Davis
Fred D. Davis Texas Tech University
Yash P. Gupta
Yash P. Gupta University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA opens up a world of diverse online degree options and career pathways across growing industries. For instance, healthcare is rapidly expanding and management opportunities are plentiful. Those looking to enter this sector can consider a health care administration degree online, which provides essential business and leadership skills tailored to the unique needs of healthcare organizations.

Many professionals enhance their careers further with additional training like a healthcare administration certificate. This credential can help graduates qualify for advanced roles or transition into specialized management positions within the healthcare field.

Besides healthcare, accounting remains a core discipline within business. Pursuing the most affordable online accounting degree can lead to a stable and in-demand career managing finances, auditing, or working within corporate finance departments.

For those interested in technology, business management skills can be paired with emerging fields. Exploring the cheapest online masters in artificial intelligence blends business acumen with cutting-edge tech expertise, unlocking opportunities in AI-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Doll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles