World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
14899
World Ranking
5236
National Ranking
2410

Shimon Edelman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shimon Edelman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Shimon Edelman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shimon Edelman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shimon Edelman is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their body of work spans several specialized areas, including cognitive neuroscience, safety research, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and molecular biology. The scientist's research topics emphasize neural dynamics and brain function, ethics and social impacts of AI, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, evolutionary game theory and cooperation, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, face recognition and perception, as well as neuroethics, human enhancement, and biomedical innovations.

Edelman has published multiple papers that have appeared in diverse academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • "A possible evolutionary function of phenomenal conscious experience of pain," 2021, Neuroscience of Consciousness
  • "Dynamical Emergence Theory (DET): A Computational Account of Phenomenal Consciousness," 2020, Minds and Machines
  • "Parental speech to typical and atypical populations: a study on linguistic partial repetition," 2020, Language Sciences
  • "Verbal behavior without syntactic structures: beyond Skinner and Chomsky," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Polarize, catalyze, and stabilize: how a minority of norm internalizers amplify group selection and punishment," 2023, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Their frequent publication venues reflect a consistent presence in both traditional and interdisciplinary journals, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith
  • Neuroscience of Consciousness
  • Minds and Machines
  • Language Sciences

Edelman has also authored at least one book published by The MIT Press titled Life, Death, and Other Inconvenient Truths (2020).

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Roy Moyal
  • Victor Vikram Odouard
  • D. M. Smirnova
  • Oren Kolodny
  • Tomer Fekete

Best Publications

  • A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

    T. Poggio;S. Edelman

  • Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition

    Heinrich H. Bulthoff;Shimon Edelman

  • Representation and recognition in vision

    Shimon Edelman

  • Fast Perceptual Learning in Visual Hyperacuity

    Tomaso Poggio;Manfred Fahle;Shimon Edelman

  • A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe.

    Kalanit Grill-Spector;Tammar Kushnir;Talma Hendler;Shimon Edelman

  • Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

    Shimon Edelman;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Representation is representation of similarities.

    Shimon Edelman

  • How Are Three-Deminsional Objects Represented in the Brain?

    Heinrich H. Buelthoff;Shimon Y. Edelman;Michael J. Tarr

  • Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe.

    Kalanit Grill-Spector;Tamar Kushnir;Shimon Edelman;Yacov Itzchak

  • Unsupervised Learning of Natural Languages

    Zach Solan;David Horn;Eytan Ruppin;Shimon Edelman

  • Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback

    Manfred Fahle;Shimon Edelman

  • Fast Perceptual Learning in Hyperacuity

    M. Fahle;S. Edelman;T. Poggio

  • Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.

    Arik Kershenbaum;Arik Kershenbaum;Daniel T. Blumstein;Marie A. Roch;Çağlar Akçay

  • Toward direct visualization of the internal shape representation space by fMRI

    Shimon Edelman;Kalanit Grill-Spector;Tammar Kushnir;Rafael Malach

  • Representation, Similarity, and the Chorus of Prototypes

    S. Edelman

  • Similarity-based Word Sense Disambiguation

    Yael Karov;Shimon Edelman

  • A model of handwriting.

    Shimon Edelman;Tamar Flash

  • A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects

    Daphna Weinshall;Shimon Edelman;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Computational theories of object recognition.

    Shimon Edelman

  • Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint

    Alice J O'Toole;Shimon Edelman;Heinrich H Bülthoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathan Intrator
Nathan Intrator Tel Aviv University
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Eytan Ruppin
Eytan Ruppin National Institutes of Health
Rafael Malach
Rafael Malach Weizmann Institute of Science
Daphna Weinshall
Daphna Weinshall Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Kalanit Grill-Spector
Kalanit Grill-Spector Stanford University
Manfred Fahle
Manfred Fahle University of Bremen
Yair Weiss
Yair Weiss Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens many flexible options to advance your education and career entirely online. If you want to qualify quickly for tech jobs, you might consider easy certifications to get online. These can help you enter the workforce fast and boost your resume with in-demand skills.

Ambitious learners who already hold a bachelor’s can look into quick masters degrees online for a faster route to advanced credentials in areas like data science, cybersecurity, or software engineering.

It’s also wise to research the most useful graduate degrees to choose a field with high employer demand and salary potential, ensuring your investment pays off.

For those just starting their academic journey or seeking a more affordable entry point, associates degrees online offer a solid technical foundation and a stepping stone to future bachelor’s or master’s programs.

Best Scientists Citing Shimon Edelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles