World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nathan Intrator

Nathan Intrator

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 43 6046 5829 39 37 187 9644

Nathan Intrator publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nathan Intrator between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nathan Intrator published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2004. 7 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2004. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1987 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nathan Intrator: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 2
1992 6
1993 3
1994 4
1995 2
1996 9
1997 12
1998 11
1999 9
2000 5
2001 4
2002 11
2003 13
2004 23
2005 11
2006 5
2007 5
2008 5
2009 4
2010 3
2011 7
2012 8
2013 2
2014 7
2015 3
2016 4
2017 2
2018 0
2019 3
2020 7
2021 2
2022 6
2023 2
2024 2
2025 5
Total 215
Download as CSV

Nathan Intrator publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Intrator sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 187 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 187
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Nathan Intrator D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Intrator sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380 43
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Nathan Intrator is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience, with significant work on the neural dynamics of brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and functional brain connectivity studies. Additional areas of study include anesthesiology and pain medicine, critical care and intensive care medicine, and developmental neuroscience.

The scientist has published numerous papers covering a range of topics related to neural and behavioral psychology, anesthesia and neurotoxicity research, anesthesia and sedative agents, and cognitive disorders in intensive care units. Their work has appeared in various academic venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to brain research and clinical neuroscience.

  • Recent papers include:
  • Continuous Monitoring of Mental Load During Virtual Simulator Training for Laparoscopic Surgery Reflects Laparoscopic Dexterity: A Comparative Study Using a Novel Wireless Device, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Postural Control in Karate Practitioners: Does Practice Make Perfect?, 2020, Gait & Posture
  • Single-channel EEG Features During n-back Task Correlate with Working Memory Load, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Novel Single-Channel EEG Features Correlate with Working Memory Load, 2021, 2021 IEEE 3rd Global Conference on Life Sciences and Technologies (LifeTech)
  • Single-Channel EEG Features Reveal an Association With Cognitive Decline in Seniors Performing Auditory Cognitive Assessment, 2022, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Lior Molcho, Neta B. Maimon, Amitai Bickel, Ady Sasson, and Talya Zeimer. Collaboration with these researchers has helped to expand the scope and depth of studies in neural function and cognitive assessment.

  • Frequent publication venues are:
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Research Square
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

The scientist's main fields of study are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these, their specialized subfields include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

The primary topics encompassed in their research are:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Best Publications

  • Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks

    Unknown

  • Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI.

    Ofer Pasternak;Nir Sochen;Yaniv Gur;Nathan Intrator

  • Invited Article: Objective function formulation of the BCM theory of visual cortical plasticity: Statistical connections, stability conditions

    Nathan Intrator;Leon N Cooper

  • Optimal ensemble averaging of neural networks

    Ury Naftaly;Nathan Intrator;David Horn

  • Bootstrapping with Noise: An Effective Regularization Technique

    Yuval Raviv;Nathan Intrator

  • Offline cursive script word recognition : a survey

    Tal Steinherz;Ehud Rivlin;Nathan Intrator

  • Classification of seismic signals by integrating ensembles of neural networks

    Y. Shimshoni;N. Intrator

  • Boosted mixture of experts: an ensemble learning scheme

    Ran Avnimelech;Nathan Intrator

  • Face recognition using a hybrid supervised/unsupervised neural network

    Nathan Intrator;Daniel Reisfeld;Yehezkel Yeshurun

  • Theory of Cortical Plasticity

    Leon N. Cooper;Nathan Intrator;Brian S. Blais;Harel Z. Shouval

  • Acoustic cardiac assessment

    Noam Gavriely;Nathan Intrator

  • Complex cells and Object Recognition

    Shimon Edelman;Nathan Intrator;Tomaso Poggio

  • Boosting regression estimators

    Ran Avnimelech;Nathan Intrator

  • Electrical fingerprint of the amygdala guides neurofeedback training for stress resilience.

    Jackob N. Keynan;Jackob N. Keynan;Avihay Cohen;Avihay Cohen;Gilan Jackont;Gilan Jackont;Nili Green;Nili Green

  • Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations

    Shimon Edelman;Nathan Intrator

  • Coarse coding of shape fragments) (Retinotopy) Representation of structure

    Shimon Edelman;Nathan Intrator

  • Detection and identification of heart sounds using homomorphic envelogram and self-organizing probabilistic model

    D. Gill;N. Gavrieli;N. Intrator

  • Feature extraction using an unsupervised neural network

    Nathan Intrator

  • Interpreting neural-network results: a simulation study

    Orna Intrator;Nathan Intrator

  • An EEG Finger-Print of fMRI deep regional activation.

    Yehudit Meir-Hasson;Sivan Kinreich;Ilana Podlipsky;Talma Hendler

  • Schizophrenia Detection and Classification by Advanced Analysis of EEG Recordings Using a Single Electrode Approach

    Zack Dvey-Aharon;Noa Fogelson;Avi Peled;Nathan Intrator

  • Classification of underwater mammals using feature extraction based on time-frequency analysis and BCM theory

    Q.Q. Huynh;L.N. Cooper;N. Intrator;H. Shouval

Frequent Co-Authors

Talma Hendler
Talma Hendler Tel Aviv University
Shimon Edelman
Shimon Edelman Cornell University
James A. Simmons
James A. Simmons Brown University
Ehud Rivlin
Ehud Rivlin Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Nir Sochen
Nir Sochen Tel Aviv University
Leslie G. Ungerleider
Leslie G. Ungerleider National Institutes of Health
Itzhak Fried
Itzhak Fried University of California, Los Angeles
Ofer Pasternak
Ofer Pasternak Brigham and Women's Hospital
Marc Cavazza
Marc Cavazza University of Stirling
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology studies open up a diverse set of online degree options and career paths closely aligned with today’s evolving digital landscape. For example, students interested in property, finance, and technology may explore a real estate degree online. This program builds skills in property management and valuation, which are increasingly reliant on tech-driven solutions.

For those passionate about design and creating seamless user experiences, ui ux degree programs offer hands-on learning in user interface and user experience, fields that are in high demand across all industries. If coordinating technological and engineering projects appeals to you, a project manager degree can prepare you for leadership roles, teaching essential organizational and technical skills.

The rise of digital assets also brings interest in blockchain degree programs, which focus on the technology powering cryptocurrencies and modern finance. These related pathways allow students to tailor their education with in-demand, flexible online options that support a wide range of tech-focused careers.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan Intrator

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles