World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
41497
World Ranking
8917
National Ranking
684

Maggie C.U. Cheang publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maggie C.U. Cheang sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 384 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Maggie C.U. Cheang D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maggie C.U. Cheang sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maggie C.U. Cheang is affiliated with the Institute of Cancer Research in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these areas, their subfields of study include oncology, cancer research, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, and molecular biology.

The primary topics of Maggie C.U. Cheang's work include:

  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses

Their publication record shows contributions to several frequent venues, including:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Research
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • npj Breast Cancer
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Among notable recent papers by Maggie C.U. Cheang are:

  • Long-term outcome and prognostic value of Ki67 after perioperative endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer (POETIC): an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, phase 3 trial (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer (2020, npj Breast Cancer)
  • Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes (2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • Best Practices for Spatial Profiling for Breast Cancer Research with the GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiler (2021, Cancers)
  • Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: The TNT Trial (2021, UNC Libraries)

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated include:

  • Judith M. Bliss
  • Lucy Kilburn
  • Mitch Dowsett
  • Charles M. Perou
  • Holly Tovey

Best Publications

  • Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes

    Joel S. Parker;Michael Mullins;Maggie C.U. Cheang;Samuel Leung

  • Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

    Lisa A. Carey;Charles M. Perou;Chad A. Livasy;Lynn G. Dressler

  • Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma

    Torsten O. Nielsen;Forrest D. Hsu;Kristin Jensen;Maggie Cheang

  • Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer

    Maggie C. U. Cheang;Stephen K Chia;David Voduc;Dongxia Gao

  • Metastatic Behavior of Breast Cancer Subtypes

    Hagen Kennecke;Rinat Yerushalmi;Ryan Woods;Maggie Chon U. Cheang

  • Breast Cancer Subtypes and the Risk of Local and Regional Relapse

    K. David Voduc;Maggie C.U. Cheang;Scott Tyldesley;Karen Gelmon

  • Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype.

    Maggie C.U. Cheang;David Voduc;Chris Bajdik;Samuel Leung

  • Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies

    Fiona M. Blows;Kristy E. Driver;Marjanka K. Schmidt;Annegien Broeks

  • Mutation Tracking in Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Relapse in Early Breast Cancer

    Isaac Garcia-Murillas;Gaia Schiavon;Gaia Schiavon;Britta Weigelt;Charlotte Ng

  • A Comparison of PAM50 Intrinsic Subtyping with Immunohistochemistry and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Tamoxifen-Treated Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

    Torsten O Nielsen;Joel S Parker;Samuel Leung;K David Voduc

  • Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: The TNT Trial

    Andrew Tutt;Andrew Tutt;Holly Tovey;Maggie Chon U Cheang;Sarah Kernaghan

  • Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor–Positive Tumor Cells Within Immunohistochemically Defined Luminal A Breast Cancer

    Aleix Prat;Maggie Chon U. Cheang;Miguel Martín;Joel S. Parker

  • Molecular Characterization of Basal-Like and Non-Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Aleix Prat;Barbara Adamo;Maggie C.U. Cheang;Carey K. Anders

  • Breast Cancer Subtypes and Response to Docetaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Use of an Immunohistochemical Definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial

    Judith Hugh;John Hanson;Maggie Chon U. Cheang;Torsten O. Nielsen

  • Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer

    Marc Tischkowitz;Marc Tischkowitz;Jean-Sébastien Brunet;Jean-Sébastien Brunet;Louis R. Bégin;David G. Huntsman

  • Molecular Heterogeneity and Response to Neoadjuvant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Targeting in CALGB 40601, a Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Trastuzumab With or Without Lapatinib

    Lisa A. Carey;Donald A. Berry;Constance T. Cirrincione;William T. Barry

  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers.

    Stephen Chia;Brian Norris;Caroline Speers;Maggie Cheang

  • Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in Neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: Results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)

    Laura J. Esserman;Donald A. Berry;Maggie C. U. Cheang;Christina Yau

  • Akt phosphorylates the Y-box binding protein 1 at Ser102 located in the cold shock domain and affects the anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer cells

    Brent W Sutherland;Jill Kucab;Joyce Wu;Cathy Lee

  • Nuclear beta-catenin in mesenchymal tumors.

    Tony L Ng;Allen M Gown;Todd S Barry;Maggie C U Cheang

Frequent Co-Authors

Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
Charles M. Perou
Charles M. Perou University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mitch Dowsett
Mitch Dowsett Breast Cancer Research Foundation
David G. Huntsman
David G. Huntsman University of British Columbia
Andrew Tutt
Andrew Tutt Institute of Cancer Research
Karen A. Gelmon
Karen A. Gelmon University of British Columbia
Judith M. Bliss
Judith M. Bliss Institute of Cancer Research
Aleix Prat
Aleix Prat University of Barcelona
Matthew J. Ellis
Matthew J. Ellis Baylor College of Medicine
Joel S. Parker
Joel S. Parker University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Biology and Biochemistry often leads to diverse opportunities, both inside and outside the lab. Many students choose interdisciplinary paths that build on their biology background, such as clinical research, public health, or healthcare administration. Today, online degrees offer the flexibility to expand your qualifications from anywhere in the world.

For those interested in combining patient care with a strong science foundation, an asn program online can be a great option. Aspiring nutritionists and health advocates may want to consider an online bachelor's in nutrition to blend biology with real-world health practices.

If you see yourself in healthcare leadership, the number of cahme accredited mha programs available online is growing, providing pathways into healthcare management without needing to relocate. For those seeking advanced nursing roles, a dnp online no clinicals option can help you attain a doctorate while balancing work and study.

Whether you're starting out or aiming for the next step, these online degrees can help shape a fulfilling career inspired by biology and biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Maggie C.U. Cheang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles