World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
4780
World Ranking
9155
National Ranking
554

Ulrich Corsmeier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Corsmeier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ulrich Corsmeier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Corsmeier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Corsmeier is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily traverses the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work explores multiple main topics such as Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, as well as Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics.

Among Ulrich Corsmeier's recent publications are:

  • "Vertical stratification of the air microbiome in the lower troposphere," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "CROSSINN: A Field Experiment to Study the Three-Dimensional Flow Structure in the Inn Valley, Austria," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Understanding summer wind systems over the eastern Mediterranean in a high-resolution climate simulation," 2022, International Journal of Climatology
  • "A New Airborne Doppler Lidar for Boundary Layer Research & LES-Based Simulation," 2020, EPJ Web of Conferences
  • "The CROSSINN Field Experiment: 3-D Flow Structure and Boundary Layer Behavior in an Austrian Valley," 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent publication venues for Ulrich Corsmeier include:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • International Journal of Climatology
  • EPJ Web of Conferences
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Collaborations form an important part of their research, with frequent coauthors being:

  • Norbert Kalthoff
  • Thomas Feuerle
  • Rudolf Hankers
  • Bianca Adler
  • Alexander Gohm

The research scope of Ulrich Corsmeier covers significant interdisciplinary topics at the intersection of atmospheric science and environmental engineering, emphasizing meteorological phenomena and air flow dynamics. The scientist's contributions include empirical field experiments and high-resolution simulations, aiding in the understanding of atmospheric processes relevant to air quality and climate.

Best Publications

  • The key role of diabatic processes in modifying the upper-tropospheric wave guide: a North Atlantic case-study

    Christian M. Grams;Heini Wernli;Maxi Böttcher;Jana Čampa

  • HyMeX-SOP1: The Field Campaign Dedicated to Heavy Precipitation and Flash Flooding in the Northwestern Mediterranean

    Véronique Ducrocq;Isabelle Braud;Silvio Davolio;Rossella Ferretti

  • The Convective and Orographically Induced Precipitation Study. A Research and Development Project of the World Weather Research Program for Improving Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting in Low-Mountain Regions

    Volker Wulfmeyer;Andreas Behrendt;Hans-Stefan Bauer;Christoph Kottmeier

  • The Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study (COPS): the scientific strategy, the field phase, and research highlights

    Volker Wulfmeyer;Andreas Behrendt;Christoph Kottmeier;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • The Convective Storm Initiation Project

    Keith A. Browning;Alan M. Blyth;Peter A. Clark;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • Ozone concentration jump in the stable nocturnal boundary layer during a LLJ-event

    U. Corsmeier;N. Kalthoff;O. Kolle;M. Kotzian

  • Mechanisms initiating deep convection over complex terrain during COPS

    Christoph Kottmeier;Norbert Kalthoff;Christian Barthlott;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • Aspects of the convective boundary layer structure over complex terrain

    M. Kossmann;R. Vögtlin;U. Corsmeier;B. Vogel

  • Observation of convection initiation processes with a suite of state‐of‐the‐art research instruments during COPS IOP 8b

    A. Behrendt;S. Pal;F. Aoshima;M. Bender

  • Effects of Urban Land Use on Surface Temperature in Berlin: Case Study

    Christoph Kottmeier;Claudia Biegert;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • The influence of mesoscale circulation systems on triggering convective cells over complex terrain

    Christian Barthlott;Ulrich Corsmeier;Cathérine Meißner;Frank Braun

  • The impact of convergence zones on the initiation of deep convection: A case study from COPS

    N. Kalthoff;B. Adler;Ch. Barthlott;U. Corsmeier

  • Spatial variability of particle number concentrations and NOx in the Karlsruhe (Germany) area obtained with the mobile laboratory ‘AERO-TRAM’

    Rowell Hagemann;Ulrich Corsmeier;Christoph Kottmeier;Rayk Rinke

  • Temporal evolution and spatial variation of the boundary layer over complex terrain

    N. Kalthoff;H.-J. Binder;M. Kossmann;R. VÖgtlin

  • Influence of valley winds on transport and dispersion of airborne pollutants in the Freiburg‐Schauinsland area

    N. Kalthoff;V. Horlacher;U. Corsmeier;A. Volz-Thomas

  • Convective Boundary-Layer Entrainment: Short Review and Progress using Doppler Lidar

    K. Träumner;C.-H. Kottmeier;U. Corsmeier;A. Wieser

  • Observations of handover processes between the atmospheric boundary layer and the free troposphere over mountainous terrain

    M Kossmann;U Corsmeier;S. F. J De Wekker;F Fiedler

  • Regional transport and dilution during high-pollution episodes in southern France: Summary of findings from the Field Experiment to Constraint Models of Atmospheric Pollution and Emissions Transport (ESCOMPTE)

    Ph. Drobinski;F. Said;G. Ancellet;J. Arteta

  • Latent heat flux measurements over complex terrain by airborne water vapour and wind lidars

    Christoph Kiemle;Martin Wirth;Andreas Fix;Stephan Rahm

  • Vertical distribution of aerosol particles and NOx close to a motorway

    D. Imhof;E. Weingartner;U. Vogt;A. Dreiseidler

  • KITcube - a mobile observation platform for convection studies deployed during HyMeX

    Norbert Kalthoff;Bianca Adler;Andreas Wieser;Martin Kohler

  • The stable isotopic composition of water vapour above Corsica during the HyMeX SOP1 campaign: insight into vertical mixing processes from lower-tropospheric survey flights

    Harald Sodemann;Harald Sodemann;Harald Sodemann;Franziska Aemisegger;Stephan Pfahl;Mark Bitter

Frequent Co-Authors

Norbert Kalthoff
Norbert Kalthoff Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Christoph Kottmeier
Christoph Kottmeier Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Volker Wulfmeyer
Volker Wulfmeyer University of Hohenheim
Andreas Behrendt
Andreas Behrendt University of Hohenheim
Bernhard Vogel
Bernhard Vogel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Heini Wernli
Heini Wernli ETH Zurich
Alan M. Blyth
Alan M. Blyth University of Leeds
Peter Knippertz
Peter Knippertz Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Susanne Crewell
Susanne Crewell University of Cologne
George C. Craig
George C. Craig Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For professionals interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, there are various online degree options that cater to diverse career goals. Programs such as 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offer accelerated pathways for those seeking advanced education without lengthy dissertation requirements.

Educators and researchers can explore best online eds to edd programs to enhance leadership skills and contribute meaningfully to environmental education and policy development.

For those aiming to integrate social work and environmental advocacy, affordable options such as dsw programs provide specialized training to address societal and ecological challenges holistically.

Additionally, individuals seeking versatile skill sets might consider a broad foundation through low cost online general studies degree programs, which can complement environmental expertise with interdisciplinary knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Corsmeier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles