World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
51
Citations
15519
World Ranking
3834
National Ranking
1653

Thomas M Glaser publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M Glaser sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 90 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Thomas M Glaser D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M Glaser sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M Glaser is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Engineering, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Computer Science. Within these broad areas, their work focuses on specialized subfields such as Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's research interests cover diverse topics including Metallurgy and Material Forming, Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis, Retinal Development and Disorders, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, Time Series Analysis and Forecasting, Metal Alloys Wear and Properties, as well as Musicology and Musical Analysis.

Thomas M Glaser has contributed to several publication venues. These include:

  • Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • Production Engineering
  • Procedia Manufacturing
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among their recent publications are:

  • Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome: more than meets the eye, 2022, Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Improving quality prediction in radial-axial ring rolling using a semi-supervised approach and generative adversarial networks for synthetic data generation, 2021, Production Engineering
  • Arap1 loss causes retinal pigment epithelium phagocytic dysfunction and subsequent photoreceptor death, 2022, Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • Investigation of compaction by ring rolling on thermal sprayed coatings, 2020, Procedia Manufacturing
  • Arap1 Loss Causes RPE Phagocytic Dysfunction and Subsequent Photoreceptor Death, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors. The most frequent include:

  • Simon Fahle
  • Bernd Kuhlenkötter
  • Andy Shao
  • Antonio Jacobo Lopez
  • JiaJia Chen

In addition to journal publications, Thomas M Glaser has authored a book titled Der Interpret als Double, published in 2020 by Franz Steiner Verlag.

Best Publications

  • Isolation and characterization of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromosome 11 Wilms' tumor locus.

    Katherine M. Call;Thomas M Glaser;Caryn Y. Ito;Alan J. Buckler

  • Cloning of human mineralocorticoid receptor complementary DNA: structural and functional kinship with the glucocorticoid receptor

    Jeffrey L. Arriza;Jeffrey L. Arriza;Cary Weinberger;Gail Cerelli;Thomas M Glaser

  • PAX6 gene dosage effect in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects

    Thomas M Glaser;L. Jepeal;J. G. Edwards;S. R. Young

  • An internal deletion within an 11p13 zinc finger gene contributes to the development of Wilms' tumor.

    Daniel A. Haber;Daniel A. Haber;Alan J. Buckler;Thomas M Glaser;Katherine M. Call

  • Genomic structure, evolutionary conservation and aniridia mutations in the human PAX6 gene.

    Tom Glaser;David S. Walton;Richard L. Maas

  • WT1 mutations contribute to abnormal genital system development and hereditary Wilms' tumour

    Jerry Pelletier;Jerry Pelletier;Wendy Bruening;Frederick P. Li;Daniel A. Haber;Daniel A. Haber

  • Math5 is required for retinal ganglion cell and optic nerve formation.

    Nadean L. Brown;Sima Patel;Joseph Brzezinski;Tom Glaser

  • Two independent and interactive DNA-binding subdomains of the Pax6 paired domain are regulated by alternative splicing.

    Jonathan A. Epstein;Thomas M Glaser;Jiexing Cai;Lisa Jepeal

  • Identification of a Pax paired domain recognition sequence and evidence for DNA-dependent conformational changes.

    Jonathan Epstein;Jiexing Cai;Thomas M Glaser;Lisa Jepeal

  • Math5 encodes a murine basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor expressed during early stages of retinal neurogenesis

    Nadean L Brown;Shami Kanekar;Monica L. Vetter;Priscilla K. Tucker

  • Targeting of GFP to newborn rods by Nrl promoter and temporal expression profiling of flow-sorted photoreceptors.

    Masayuki Akimoto;Hong Cheng;Dongxiao Zhu;Joseph A. Brzezinski

  • Isolation, characterization, and expression of the murine Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) during kidney development.

    Alan J. Buckler;Jerry Pelletier;Daniel A. Haber;Thomas M Glaser

  • Complete physical map of the WAGR region of 11p13 localizes a candidate Wilms' tumor gene

    Elise A. Rose;Thomas M Glaser;Carol Jones;Cassandra L. Smith

  • Ribosomal protein L24 defect in Belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse Minute

    Edward R. Oliver;Thomas L. Saunders;Susan A. Tarlé;Thomas M Glaser

  • Deletion of a remote enhancer near ATOH7 disrupts retinal neurogenesis, causing NCRNA disease

    Noor M. Ghiasvand;Noor M. Ghiasvand;Dellaney D. Rudolph;Mohammad Mashayekhi;Joseph A. Brzezinski;Joseph A. Brzezinski

  • Tumor-specific loss of 11p15.5 alleles in del11p13 Wilms tumor and in familial adrenocortical carcinoma

    I. Henry;S. Grandjouan;P. Couillin;F. Barichard

  • 3′ deletions cause aniridia by preventing PAX6 gene expression

    James D. Lauderdale;Jonathan S. Wilensky;Edward R. Oliver;David S. Walton

  • Math5 defines the ganglion cell competence state in a subpopulation of retinal progenitor cells exiting the cell cycle

    Joseph A. Brzezinski;Lev Prasov;Thomas M Glaser

  • Erratum: PAX6 gene dosage effect in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects (Nature Genetics 7 (463-471))

    Thomas M Glaser;L. Jepeal;J. G. Edwards;S. R. Young

  • A mouse model of the aniridia-Wilms tumor deletion syndrome

    Thomas M Glaser;Joan Lane;David Housman

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel A. Haber
Daniel A. Haber Harvard University
Jerry Pelletier
Jerry Pelletier McGill University
Richard L. Maas
Richard L. Maas Brigham and Women's Hospital
Elise Héon
Elise Héon University of Toronto
Anand Swaroop
Anand Swaroop National Institutes of Health
Monica L. Vetter
Monica L. Vetter University of Utah
Jonathan A. Epstein
Jonathan A. Epstein University of Pennsylvania
David Valle
David Valle Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Yusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths, especially within the fast-growing healthcare and life sciences sectors. Many students complement their genetics background by pursuing online healthcare degrees, which offer flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in advanced nursing roles that integrate genetics knowledge, cheapest fnp programs online provide a pathway to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. These programs often cover genetic counseling and personalized medicine as part of the curriculum.

Entry-level professionals may consider exploring online nursing degree programs that can interface with genetics, especially as genomics becomes increasingly important in patient care.

Advanced practitioners seeking to lead initiatives in genetic healthcare might pursue the cheapest bsn to dnp programs to earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice. Additionally, registered nurses can bridge the gap with programs such as rn to bsn, enhancing their credentials and expanding genetic literacy.

Exploring these related online degrees can deepen your expertise and broaden your career options in genetics-driven healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M Glaser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles