World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
8135
World Ranking
4576
National Ranking
351

John H. Marsham publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Marsham sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 254 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John H. Marsham D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Marsham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John H. Marsham is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture

John H. Marsham has published research extensively in various academic venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Journal of Climate
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Weather

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Marsham include:

  • "Extreme rainfall in East Africa, October 2019-January 2020 and context under future climate change," 2020, Weather
  • "Evapotranspiration in the Amazon: spatial patterns, seasonality, and recent trends in observations, reanalysis, and climate models," 2021, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • "What Drives the Intensification of Mesoscale Convective Systems over the West African Sahel under Climate Change?" 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Assessing the impact of climate change on soil erosion in East Africa using a convection-permitting climate model," 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Effects of Explicit Convection on Future Projections of Mesoscale Circulations, Rainfall, and Rainfall Extremes over Eastern Africa," 2020, Journal of Climate

Frequent collaborators of John H. Marsham include Douglas J. Parker, D Finney, Cathryn E. Birch, Christopher M. Taylor, and Lawrence Jackson, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Optical properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution from the coarse mode as measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign

    Claire L. Ryder;Ellie J. Highwood;Philip D. Rosenberg;Jamie Trembath

  • Enhanced future changes in wet and dry extremes over Africa at convection-permitting scale.

    Elizabeth J. Kendon;Rachel A. Stratton;Simon Tucker;John H. Marsham

  • Overview of the Dust and Biomass-burning Experiment and African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Special Observing Period-0

    Jim M. Haywood;Jacques Pelon;Paola Formenti;N. A. Bharmal

  • The role of moist convection in the West African monsoon system: Insights from continental‐scale convection‐permitting simulations

    John H. Marsham;Nick S. Dixon;Luis Garcia-Carreras;Grenville M. S. Lister

  • The role of deep convection and nocturnal low‐level jets for dust emission in summertime West Africa: Estimates from convection‐permitting simulations

    B. Heinold;B. Heinold;P. Knippertz;J. H. Marsham;S. Fiedler

  • Extreme rainfall in East Africa October 2019 – January 2020 and context under future climate change

    Caroline M. Wainwright;Declan L. Finney;Mary Kilavi;Emily Black

  • The Effects of Tropical Vegetation on Rainfall

    D.V. Spracklen;J.C.A. Baker;L. Garcia-Carreras;J.H. Marsham

  • Dynamical mechanisms controlling the vertical redistribution of dust and the thermodynamic structure of the West Saharan atmospheric boundary layer during summer

    Juan Cuesta;Juan Cuesta;John H. Marsham;Douglas J. Parker;Cyrille Flamant

  • The importance of the representation of deep convection for modeled dust‐generating winds over West Africa during summer

    John H. Marsham;Peter Knippertz;Nick S. Dixon;Douglas J. Parker

  • Meteorology and dust in the central Sahara: Observations from Fennec supersite‐1 during the June 2011 Intensive Observation Period

    J. H. Marsham;M. Hobby;C. J. T. Allen;J. R. Banks

  • Uplift of Saharan dust south of the intertropical discontinuity

    J. H. Marsham;D. J. Parker;C. M. Grams;C. M. Taylor

  • The Convective Storm Initiation Project

    Keith A. Browning;Alan M. Blyth;Peter A. Clark;Ulrich Corsmeier

  • The DACCIWA project: Dynamics-aerosol-chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa

    Peter Knippertz;Hugh Coe;J. Christine Chiu;Mat J. Evans

  • ‘Eastern African Paradox’ rainfall decline due to shorter not less intense Long Rains

    Caroline M. Wainwright;John H. Marsham;Richard J. Keane;Richard J. Keane;David P. Rowell

  • Impact of atmospheric transport on the evolution of microphysical and optical properties of Saharan dust

    C. L. Ryder;E. J. Highwood;T. M. Lai;H. Sodemann

  • A seamless assessment of the role of convection in the water cycle of the West African Monsoon

    C. E. Birch;D. J. Parker;J. H. Marsham;D. Copsey

  • The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in West Africa

    Peter Knippertz;Mat J. Evans;Paul R. Field;Paul R. Field;Andreas H. Fink

  • Observations of mesoscale and boundary-layer scale circulations affecting dust transport and uplift over the Sahara

    J. H. Marsham;D. J. Parker;C. M. Grams;B. T. Johnson

  • Are vegetation-related roughness changes the cause of the recent decrease in dust emission from the Sahel?

    Sophie M. Cowie;Peter Knippertz;John H. Marsham

  • A meteorological and chemical overview of the DACCIWA field campaign in West Africa in June–July 2016

    Peter Knippertz;Andreas H. Fink;Adrien Deroubaix;Eleanor Morris

  • The Dynamics–Aerosol–Chemistry–Cloud Interactions in West Africa Field Campaign: Overview and Research Highlights

    Cyrille Flamant;Peter Knippertz;Andreas H. Fink;Aristide Akpo

  • Impact of atmospheric transport on the evolution of microphysical and optical properties of Saharan dust

    Claire Ryder;Eleanor Highwood;Michele Lai;Harald Sodemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas J. Parker
Douglas J. Parker University of Leeds
Peter Knippertz
Peter Knippertz Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Cathryn E. Birch
Cathryn E. Birch University of Leeds
Richard Washington
Richard Washington University of Oxford
James B. McQuaid
James B. McQuaid University of Leeds
Martin C. Todd
Martin C. Todd University of Sussex
Paul R. Field
Paul R. Field Met Office
Alan M. Blyth
Alan M. Blyth University of Leeds
Cyrille Flamant
Cyrille Flamant Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens multiple educational and career paths tailored to your interests and goals. For those seeking advanced knowledge with minimal financial strain, exploring fully funded dsw programs online can provide valuable insights into sustainable social work practices linked to environmental issues.

If you prefer a broad interdisciplinary approach, an affordable online general studies degree offers flexibility while still covering essential environmental topics. This option is ideal for students balancing other commitments or considering a career pivot.

For those starting out, choosing one of the easiest bachelors degree programs online may help ease the transition into higher education, especially if you want a less intensive entry into environmental fields. This can build foundational skills before specializing further.

Specifically focused on Earth sciences, a geology online degree complements Environmental Science studies by offering expertise in geology, soil science, and resource management—key areas influencing environmental policies and conservation efforts.

Best Scientists Citing John H. Marsham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles