World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
17494
World Ranking
18573
National Ranking
9250

Ellis J. Neufeld publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellis J. Neufeld sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 306 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ellis J. Neufeld D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellis J. Neufeld sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in American adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

    Sarah D. de Ferranti;Kimberlee Gauvreau;David S. Ludwig;Ellis J. Neufeld

  • Complications of β-thalassemia major in North America

    Melody J. Cunningham;Eric A. Macklin;Ellis J. Neufeld;Alan R. Cohen

  • Outcomes 5 years after response to rituximab therapy in children and adults with immune thrombocytopenia.

    Vivek L. Patel;Matthieu Mahévas;Soo Y. Lee;Roberto Stasi

  • Effectiveness and safety of ICL670 in iron-loaded patients with thalassaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial

    Eric Nisbet-Brown;Nancy F Olivieri;Nancy F Olivieri;Patricia J Giardina;Patricia J Giardina;Robert W Grady;Robert W Grady

  • Oral chelators deferasirox and deferiprone for transfusional iron overload in thalassemia major: new data, new questions

    Ellis J. Neufeld

  • Relative response of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and other transfusion-dependent anaemias to deferasirox (ICL670): a 1-yr prospective study

    John Porter;Renzo Galanello;Giuseppe Saglio;Ellis E.J. Neufeld

  • The frequency and management of asparaginase-related thrombosis in paediatric and adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute consortium protocols.

    Rachael F. Grace;Suzanne E. Dahlberg;Donna Neuberg;Stephen E. Sallan

  • Prospective phase 1/2 study of rituximab in childhood and adolescent chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

    Carolyn M. Bennett;Zora R. Rogers;Daniel D. Kinnamon;James B. Bussel

  • Human CCAAT displacement protein is homologous to the Drosophila homeoprotein, cut.

    Ellis J. Neufeld;David G. Skalnik;Patricia M-J. Lievens;Stuart H. Orkin

  • The gene mutated in thiamine-responsive anaemia with diabetes and deafness (TRMA) encodes a functional thiamine transporter.

    Judith C. Fleming;Elena Tartaglini;Mara P. Steinkamp;Daniel F. Schorderet

  • Phosphoinositide interconversion in thrombin-stimulated human platelets.

    D B Wilson;E J Neufeld;P W Majerus

  • Urinary hepcidin in congenital chronic anemias.

    Susan L. Kearney;Elizabeta Nemeth;Ellis J. Neufeld;Dharma Thapa

  • Severe hemorrhage in children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenic purpura

    Cindy E. Neunert;Cindy E. Neunert;George R. Buchanan;George R. Buchanan;Paul Imbach;Paula H B Bolton-Maggs

  • Asparaginase-associated lipid abnormalities in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Susan K. Parsons;Stephen X. Skapek;Ellis J. Neufeld;Caroline Kuhlman

  • Mobility, clustering, and transport of nerve growth factor in embryonal sensory cells and in a sympathetic neuronal cell line.

    Andrea Levi;Yoram Shechter;Ellis J. Neufeld;Joseph Schlessinger

  • Systematic molecular genetic analysis of congenital sideroblastic anemia: evidence for genetic heterogeneity and identification of novel mutations.

    Anke K. Bergmann;Dean R. Campagna;Erin M. McLoughlin;Suneet Agarwal;Suneet Agarwal

  • CDP/cut is the DNA-binding subunit of histone gene transcription factor HiNF-D: a mechanism for gene regulation at the G1/S phase cell cycle transition point independent of transcription factor E2F.

    A J van Wijnen;M F van Gurp;M C de Ridder;C Tufarelli

  • Arachidonate release and phosphatidic acid turnover in stimulated human platelets.

    E J Neufeld;P W Majerus

  • Sequence-specific DNA binding of individual cut repeats of the human CCAAT displacement/cut homeodomain protein

    Barbara Aufiero;Ellis J. Neufeld;Stuart H. Orkin

  • Platelet function tests, independent of platelet count, are associated with bleeding severity in ITP

    Andrew L. Frelinger;Rachael F. Grace;Anja J. Gerrits;Michelle A. Berny-Lang

Frequent Co-Authors

Elliott Vichinsky
Elliott Vichinsky University of California, San Francisco
Nancy F. Olivieri
Nancy F. Olivieri University of Toronto
John B. Porter
John B. Porter University College London
James B. Bussel
James B. Bussel Cornell University
Philip W. Majerus
Philip W. Majerus Washington University in St. Louis
Mark D. Fleming
Mark D. Fleming Boston Children's Hospital
Jane W. Newburger
Jane W. Newburger Boston Children's Hospital
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Nader Rifai
Nader Rifai Boston Children's Hospital
David B. Wilson
David B. Wilson Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, it’s important to know there are many related online degrees and career paths available. For those looking to enter the healthcare field quickly, a healthcare administration associate degree online can provide a direct path to roles in healthcare management and administration.

Nursing professionals who wish to advance their qualifications can explore flexible adn to np programs online, designed to bridge their Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) to a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), enabling them to take on advanced practice roles.

Those interested in nutrition and public health may want to consider one of the best online nutrition programs to build expertise in dietetics, wellness, and health promotion.

Finally, administrative career seekers can pursue advanced leadership positions with online mha programs cahme accredited, ensuring their master’s degree meets high industry standards for healthcare management education.

Exploring these online pathways can open diverse opportunities within the healthcare sector, and may provide greater flexibility as you plan your future in medicine or health-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ellis J. Neufeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles