World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
6531
World Ranking
6267
National Ranking
2801

Peter J. Marsico publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Marsico sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 220 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter J. Marsico D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Marsico sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Computer network
  • Telecommunications
  • Database

Peter J. Marsico mainly investigates Computer network, Node, Computer program, Distributed computing and Routing. He incorporates Computer network and Subject matter in his research. His Distributed computing research incorporates elements of Connection control, Service selection, Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol and Routing protocol.

His studies deal with areas such as Call setup, Message processing and Intelligent Network as well as Routing. His Message broker research incorporates themes from Short Message Service and Network address. His Identifier study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as International mobile subscriber identity, Database, Messaging pattern, Address resolution and Listing.

His most cited work include:

  • Methods, systems, and computer program products for content-based screening of messaging service messages (159 citations)
  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for condition-triggered policies (155 citations)
  • Methods and systems for routing messages associated with ported subscribers in a mobile communications network (154 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Peter J. Marsico focuses on Computer network, Node, Computer program, Subject matter and Routing. Many of his studies on Computer network involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Distributed computing. His Node study incorporates themes from Network management, Mobility management and Message routing.

Throughout his Computer program studies, he incorporates elements of other sciences such as Computer security, Database, Service, Multimedia and E.164. His studies in Routing integrate themes in fields like Call setup and Message processing. His work carried out in the field of Message broker brings together such families of science as Message service and Short Message Service.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer network (71.78%)
  • Node (29.21%)
  • Computer program (25.74%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2009-2017)?

  • Computer network (71.78%)
  • Subject matter (19.80%)
  • Node (29.21%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Computer network, Subject matter, Node, Routing and Router. His Computer network research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Real-time computing and Distributed computing. He has researched Distributed computing in several fields, including Network element, Static routing, Processing element and Dynamic Source Routing.

His Node course of study focuses on Telecommunications network and Policy enforcement. Peter J. Marsico combines subjects such as Mobile database, Media content, Mobile device and Cache with his study of Routing. The study incorporates disciplines such as Session, Bearer-Independent Call Control and Microarchitecture in addition to Router.

Between 2009 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for condition-triggered policies (155 citations)
  • Methods, systems and computer readable media for providing priority routing at a diameter node (109 citations)
  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing dynamic origination-based routing key registration in a diameter network (86 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Computer network
  • Telecommunications
  • Database

Peter J. Marsico mostly deals with Computer network, Subject matter, Node, Routing and Router. His Computer network study frequently links to other fields, such as Distributed computing. Peter J. Marsico interconnects Equal-cost multi-path routing, Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol, Routing table, Geographic routing and Link-state routing protocol in the investigation of issues within Distributed computing.

His Node study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Telecommunications network and Message processing. His Routing research integrates issues from Identifier, Real-time computing and Network service. His Router study incorporates themes from Session and Microarchitecture.

Best Publications

  • Methods, systems, and computer program products for content-based screening of messaging service messages

    Patricia A. Baldwin;Peter J. Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for condition-triggered policies

    Yusun Kim Riley;Bradley W. Gosnell;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods and systems for routing messages associated with ported subscribers in a mobile communications network

    Thomas Matthew McCann;Raghavendra Gopala Rao;Robert Fulton West;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods and systems for generating, distributing, and screening commercial content

    Robert J. Delaney;Peter Joseph Marsico;Todd Eichler;Gregory P. Kowis

  • Methods and systems for universal, automatic service selection in a telecommunications signaling network

    Rick L. Allison;Raghavendra G. Rao;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods, systems and computer readable media for providing priority routing at a diameter node

    Mark Edward Kanode;Mahesh Tomar;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing diameter signaling router with firewall functionality

    Thomas Matthew McCann;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods and systems for providing short message gateway functionality in a telecommunications network

    Thomas M. McCann;Raghavendra G. Rao;Richard E. Schaedler;Apirux Bantukul

  • Methods, systems, and computer program products for delivering messaging service messages

    Patricia A. Baldwin;Peter J. Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing dynamic origination-based routing key registration in a diameter network

    Mark Edward Kanode;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods and systems for observing, analyzing and correlating multi-protocol signaling message traffic in a mobile telecommunications network

    Michael John Drum;Patrick Joseph Galizia;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer program products for clustering and communicating between Internet protocol multimedia subsystem (IMS) entities

    Richard E. Schaedler;Robert L. Wallace;Aziz A. Tejani;Thomas L. Bonds

  • Systems, methods, and computer readable media for providing dynamic steering of roaming in a telecommunications network

    Robert James Sparks;Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer program products for providing wireless-fidelity (Wi-Fi) gateway visitor location register (VLR) functionality

    Peter J. Marsico;Venkataramaiah Ravishankar

  • Method and systems for off-loading a-interface short message service (sms) message traffic in a wireless communications network

    Apirux Bantukul;Venkataramaiah Ravishankar;Peter J. Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for diameter routing agent (DRA) based credit status triggered policy control

    Venkataramaiah Ravishankar;Peter J. Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer readable media for selective policy enhancement (pe) for high-usage roamers

    Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods, systems, and computer program products for providing third party control of access to media content available via broadcast and multicast service (BCMCS)

    Peter Joseph Marsico

  • Methods and systems for providing message translation, accounting and routing service in a multi-protocol communications network environment

    Robert John Tinsley;Peter Joseph Marsico;David Michael Sprague

  • Presence registration and routing node

    John R. Mason;Peter Joseph Marsico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is a smart choice for students interested in Computer Science. Many universities now offer flexible online programs that can fit your schedule and budget. Whether you're seeking a quick credential or a more advanced degree, there's a path to meet every goal.

For those looking to upskill fast, the quickest cheapest masters degree programs can help you gain valuable knowledge in the shortest time possible. These accelerated options are ideal for advancing your career without long periods away from work.

Thinking about future job prospects? Consider the most valuable masters degrees for higher earning potential and career opportunities in tech.

If you’re just starting out or want an affordable first step, there are 2 year online degrees that provide foundational knowledge and can lead directly to entry-level positions.

Saving on tuition is also key. Check out the cheapest online colleges for cost-effective routes to a recognized degree. With so many options available, it’s easier than ever to find a program that matches your career goals and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Marsico

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles