World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maryline Talmant

Maryline Talmant

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
31
Citations
3674
World Ranking
9710
National Ranking
238

Maryline Talmant publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maryline Talmant sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 170 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Maryline Talmant D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maryline Talmant sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maryline Talmant is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Engineering. Their work spans several subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Mechanical Engineering.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to ultrasound and imaging techniques, including:

  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

Their recent publications illustrate a focus on ultrasonic methods for studying bone properties and wave propagation. Notable works include:

  • Measuring anisotropy of elastic wave velocity with ultrasound imaging and an autofocus method: application to cortical bone (2020, Physics in Medicine and Biology)
  • Using ultrasonic attenuation in cortical bone to infer distributions on pore size (2022, Applied Mathematical Modelling)

These papers demonstrate applications of ultrasonic imaging techniques to better understand the mechanical characteristics of cortical bone, with implications for medical diagnostics and material studies.

Maryline Talmant collaborates regularly with several researchers, among them:

  • Guillaume Renaud
  • Pierre Clouzet
  • Didier Cassereau
  • Rebekah White
  • Alen Alexanderian

The venues where Maryline Talmant publishes reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research, including:

  • Physics in Medicine and Biology
  • Applied Mathematical Modelling

Best Publications

  • Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models.

    Emmanuel Bossy;Maryline Talmant;Pascal Laugier

  • Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study

    Emmanuel Bossy;Maryline Talmant;Pascal Laugier

  • Nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (NRUS) applied to damage assessment in bone.

    Marie Muller;Alexander Sutin;Robert Guyer;Maryline Talmant

  • Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials

    E. Bossy;M. Talmant;M. Defontaine;F. Patat

  • An In Vitro Study of the Ultrasonic Axial Transmission Technique at the Radius: 1-MHz Velocity Measurements Are Sensitive to Both Mineralization and Intracortical Porosity†

    Emmanuel Bossy;Maryline Talmant;Françoise Peyrin;Leïla Akrout

  • Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements.

    Kay Raum;Kay Raum;Ingrid Leguerney;Florent Chandelier;Emmanuel Bossy

  • Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment.

    M. Muller;P. Moilanen;E. Bossy;P. Nicholson

  • Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status

    Estelle Camus;Maryline Talmant;Geneviève Berger;Pascal Laugier

  • High-accuracy acoustic detection of nonclassical component of material nonlinearity

    Sylvain Haupert;Guillaume Renaud;Jacques Rivière;Maryline Talmant

  • Combined estimation of thickness and velocities using ultrasound guided waves: a pioneering study on in vitro cortical bone samples

    Josquin Foiret;Jean-Gabriel Minonzio;Christine Chappard;Maryline Talmant

  • Site-matched assessment of structural and tissue properties of cortical bone using scanning acoustic microscopy and synchrotron radiation μCT

    K Raum;I Leguerney;F Chandelier;M Talmant

  • Influence of a gradient of material properties on ultrasonic wave propagation in cortical bone: application to axial transmission.

    Guillaume Haïat;Salah Naili;Quentin Grimal;Maryline Talmant

  • Apparent Young's modulus of human radius using inverse finite-element method.

    M R Bosisio;Maryline Talmant;W Skalli;Pascal Laugier

  • Ultrasonically determined thickness of long cortical bones : Three-dimensional simulations of in vitro experiments

    Petro Moilanen;Maryline Talmant;Patrick H. F. Nicholson;Sulin Cheng

  • Prediction of bone mechanical properties using QUS and pQCT: study of the human distal radius.

    M. Muller;D. Mitton;P. Moilanen;V. Bousson

  • Nonlinear elastodynamics in micro-inhomogeneous solids observed by head-wave based dynamic acoustoelastic testing

    G. Renaud;M. Talmant;S. Callé;M. Defontaine

  • Impact of attenuation on guided mode wavenumber measurement in axial transmission on bone mimicking plates

    Jean-Gabriel Minonzio;Josquin Foiret;Maryline Talmant;Pascal Laugier

  • Modeling the impact of soft tissue on axial transmission measurements of ultrasonic guided waves in human radius.

    Petro Moilanen;Maryline Talmant;Vantte Kilappa;Patrick Nicholson

  • Nonlinear ultrasound can detect accumulated damage in human bone

    M. Muller;D. Mitton;M. Talmant;P. Johnson

  • Lamb waves and fluid‐borne waves on water‐loaded, air‐filled thin spherical shells

    Maryline Talmant;H. Überall;Russel D. Miller;Michael F. Werby

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Laugier
Pascal Laugier Sorbonne University
Guillaume Haiat
Guillaume Haiat Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Christian Soize
Christian Soize Université Gustave Eiffel
Paul A. Johnson
Paul A. Johnson Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jussi Timonen
Jussi Timonen University of Jyväskylä
David Mitton
David Mitton Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Peter B. Nagy
Peter B. Nagy University of Cincinnati
Peter Cloetens
Peter Cloetens European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
Robert A. Guyer
Robert A. Guyer Los Alamos National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology studies in the USA opens many flexible options for busy students and professionals. Many learners are seeking efficient and affordable paths toward career advancement, especially through online education.

Some programs cater to those looking for speed and convenience. For instance, 6 months masters degree online options allow students to upskill rapidly and re-enter the workforce with enhanced credentials. Those who prefer shorter commitments might explore 6 week college courses online, which offer focused knowledge without a long-term obligation.

Career changers or those seeking a quick boost can benefit from short certificate programs that pay well, helping them gain job-ready skills and enter well-paid technical fields. Additionally, working parents and caregivers can pursue best online degrees for moms, designed to provide flexibility and work-life balance.

Whichever pathway is chosen, online programs can help learners launch or advance rewarding careers in engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Maryline Talmant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles