World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 38 4293 4018 88 79 128 7826

Steven P. C. Groot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven P. C. Groot between 1982 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven P. C. Groot published across 40 years, from 1982 to 2021, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2008. 11 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2008. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications
1982 2021

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven P. C. Groot: publications per year, 1982 to 2021
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 1
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 0
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 6
1998 7
1999 5
2000 6
2001 1
2002 5
2003 4
2004 6
2005 4
2006 4
2007 4
2008 8
2009 6
2010 3
2011 1
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
2015 4
2016 4
2017 3
2018 5
2019 3
2020 6
2021 5
Total 125
Download as CSV

Steven P. C. Groot publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven P. C. Groot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 126–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 128 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219 128
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Steven P. C. Groot D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven P. C. Groot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247 38
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Enzyme

Steven P. C. Groot mainly focuses on Germination, Botany, Radicle, Gibberellin and Biochemistry. His work in Germination addresses issues such as Arabidopsis, which are connected to fields such as Arabidopsis thaliana. His Botany study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Quantitative trait locus, Abscisic acid and Horticulture.

His studies in Radicle integrate themes in fields like Endosperm, Mitosis, Cell biology, Cell cycle and Priming. In his research, Paclobutrazol is intimately related to Gibberellic acid, which falls under the overarching field of Gibberellin. His Biochemistry research includes themes of Imbibition and Seedling.

His most cited work include:

  • Proteomic Analysis of Arabidopsis Seed Germination and Priming (496 citations)
  • Gibberellins regulate seed germination in tomato by endosperm weakening: a study with gibberellin-deficient mutants (307 citations)
  • Proteome-Wide Characterization of Seed Aging in Arabidopsis: A Comparison between Artificial and Natural Aging Protocols (280 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Germination, Botany, Horticulture, Agronomy and Seed treatment are his primary areas of study. His work deals with themes such as Gibberellin and Longevity, which intersect with Germination. His work is dedicated to discovering how Botany, Arabidopsis are connected with Arabidopsis thaliana and other disciplines.

His work in Horticulture addresses subjects such as Quantitative trait locus, which are connected to disciplines such as Ageing. As part of one scientific family, Steven P. C. Groot deals mainly with the area of Seed treatment, narrowing it down to issues related to the Biological pest control, and often Natural enemies. The Radicle study combines topics in areas such as Cell cycle, Biochemistry, Desiccation tolerance and Imbibition.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Germination (60.61%)
  • Botany (42.42%)
  • Horticulture (37.37%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Germination (60.61%)
  • Horticulture (37.37%)
  • Quantitative trait locus (8.08%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Steven P. C. Groot focuses on Germination, Horticulture, Quantitative trait locus, Moisture and Botany. His Germination study incorporates themes from Arabidopsis, Cell biology, Auxin, Cutting and Somatic embryogenesis. His studies in Arabidopsis integrate themes in fields like Embryo and Somatic cell.

Steven P. C. Groot combines subjects such as Crop and Longevity with his study of Horticulture. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Quantitative trait locus, Dormancy, Stratification and Seed dormancy is strongly linked to Ageing. The various areas that he examines in his Botany study include Epistasis and Doubled haploidy.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Prolonging the longevity of ex situ conserved seeds by storage under anoxia (42 citations)
  • Barley Seed Aging: Genetics behind the Dry Elevated Pressure of Oxygen Aging and Moist Controlled Deterioration. (19 citations)
  • Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Seed Germination and Seedling Vigor in Brassica rapa Reveals QTL Hotspots and Epistatic Interactions. (17 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Enzyme

Steven P. C. Groot mainly investigates Germination, Quantitative trait locus, Botany, Horticulture and Ageing. His Germination study incorporates themes from Seedling and Longevity. His Seedling research incorporates themes from Shoot, Epistasis, Doubled haploidy and Brassica rapa.

His work on Stratification and Seed dormancy as part of general Dormancy research is often related to Partial pressure and Common method, thus linking different fields of science. His Moisture research overlaps with other disciplines such as Allele and Caryopsis. His Ex situ conservation research incorporates elements of Dry storage, Anoxic waters, Initial rate, Oxygen uptake and Temporary storage.

Best Publications

  • Proteomic Analysis of Arabidopsis Seed Germination and Priming

    Karine Gallardo;Claudette Job;Steven P.C. Groot;Magda Puype

  • Gibberellins regulate seed germination in tomato by endosperm weakening: a study with gibberellin-deficient mutants

    S. P. C. Groot;C. M. Karssen

  • Proteome-Wide Characterization of Seed Aging in Arabidopsis: A Comparison between Artificial and Natural Aging Protocols

    Loïc Rajjou;Yoann Lovigny;Steven P.C. Groot;Maya Belghazi

  • Proteomics of Arabidopsis seed germination. A comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds

    Karine Gallardo;Claudette Job;Steven P.C. Groot;Magda Puype

  • Key Role for Endogenous Gibberellins in the Control of Seed Germination

    C. M. Karssen;S. Zagorski;J. Kepczynski;S. P. C. Groot

  • Analysis of natural allelic variation of Arabidopsis seed germination and seed longevity traits between the accessions Landsberg erecta and Shakdara, using a new recombinant inbred line population.

    Emile J.M. Clerkx;Mohamed E. El-Lithy;Elizabeth Vierling;Gerda J. Ruys

  • Dormancy and Germination of Abscisic Acid-Deficient Tomato Seeds Studies with the sitiens Mutant

    Steven P. C. Groot;Cees M. Karssen

  • Gene Expression Programs during Brassica oleracea Seed Maturation, Osmopriming, and Germination Are Indicators of Progression of the Germination Process and the Stress Tolerance Level

    Yasutaka Soeda;Maurice C.J.M. Konings;Oscar Vorst;Adele M.M.L. van Houwelingen

  • Gibberellin-induced hydrolysis of endosperm cell walls in gibberellin-deficient tomato seeds prior to radicle protrusion.

    Steven P. C. Groot;Barbera Kieliszewska-Rokicka;Evert Vermeer;Cees M. Karssen

  • Genetic Analysis of Seed-Soluble Oligosaccharides in Relation to Seed Storability of Arabidopsis

    Leónie Bentsink;Carlos Alonso-Blanco;Dick Vreugdenhil;Karine Tesnier

  • Cell Division and Subsequent Radicle Protrusion in Tomato Seeds Are Inhibited by Osmotic Stress But DNA Synthesis and Formation of Microtubular Cytoskeleton Are Not

    R. D. de Castro;A. A. M. van Lammeren;S. P. C. Groot;R. J. Bino

  • Importance of methionine biosynthesis for Arabidopsis seed germination and seedling growth.

    Karine Gallardo;Claudette Job;Steven P. C. Groot;Magda Puype

  • Genetic differences in seed longevity of various Arabidopsis mutants

    Emile J. M. Clerkx;Hetty Blankestijn-De Vries;Gerda J. Ruys;Steven P. C. Groot

  • The role of the cell cycle machinery in resumption of postembryonic development

    Rosa Maria Barrôco;Kris Van Poucke;Jan H.W. Bergervoet;Lieven De Veylder

  • The role of endogenous gibberellin in seed and fruit development of tomato: Studies with a gibberellin‐deficient mutant

    Steven P. C. Groot;Johan Bruinsma;Cees M. Karssen

  • Seed storage at elevated partial pressure of oxygen, a fast method for analysing seed ageing under dry conditions

    S. P. C. Groot;A. A. Surki;R. C. H. de Vos;J. Kodde

  • The influence of aerated hydration seed treatment on seed longevity as assessed by the viability equations.

    Alison A. Powell;Louise J. Yule;Hai‐Chun Jing;Steven P.C. Groot

  • Genotypic variation of rootstocks for growth and production in cucumber; possibilities for improving the root system by plant breeding

    S. Zijlstra;S.P.C. Groot;J. Jansen

  • Characterization of green seed, an Enhancer of abi3-1 in Arabidopsis That Affects Seed Longevity

    Emile J.M. Clerkx;Hetty Blankestijn-De Vries;Gerda J. Ruys;Steven P.C. Groot

  • Prolonging the longevity of ex situ conserved seeds by storage under anoxia

    S.P.C. Groot;L. de Groot;J. Kodde;R. van Treuren

  • Transient Occurrence of Seed Germination Processes during Coffee Post-harvest Treatment

    Gerhard Bytof;Sven-Erik Knopp;Daniela Kramer;Björn Breitenstein

  • A controlled deterioration test for Arabidopsis thaliana reveals genetic variation in seed quality

    K. Tesnier;H.M. Strookman-Donkers;J.G. van Pijlen;A.H.M. van der Geest

  • Disinfection of vegetable seed by treatment with essential oils, organic acids and plant extract

    J.M. van der Wolf;Y.E. Birnbaum;P.S. van der Zouwen;S.P.C. Groot

Frequent Co-Authors

Raoul J. Bino
Raoul J. Bino Wageningen University & Research
Henk W. M. Hilhorst
Henk W. M. Hilhorst University of Cape Town
Claudette Job
Claudette Job Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Dominique Job
Dominique Job Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Maarten Koornneef
Maarten Koornneef Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research
Gerco C. Angenent
Gerco C. Angenent Wageningen University & Research
Leónie Bentsink
Leónie Bentsink Wageningen University & Research
Joël Vandekerckhove
Joël Vandekerckhove Ghent University
Dick Vreugdenhil
Dick Vreugdenhil Wageningen University & Research
Gilbert Engler
Gilbert Engler INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Steven P. C. Groot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles