World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
70
Citations
32946
World Ranking
1825
National Ranking
103

William D. Penny publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William D. Penny sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William D. Penny D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William D. Penny sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Statistics
  • Machine learning

William D. Penny mainly investigates Artificial intelligence, Bayes' theorem, Bayesian probability, Bayesian inference and Machine learning. His Artificial intelligence study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Causal model and Pattern recognition. His Causal model research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Cognition, Mathematical model and Dynamic causal modelling.

William D. Penny regularly ties together related areas like Linear model in his Bayes' theorem studies. His studies examine the connections between Bayesian inference and genetics, as well as such issues in Hyperparameter, with regards to Restricted maximum likelihood, Laplace's method, Mathematical optimization, Covariance and Gibbs sampling. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Information theory, Cognitive psychology, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Functional integration.

His most cited work include:

  • Dynamic causal modelling. (3336 citations)
  • Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images (2078 citations)
  • Bayesian model selection for group studies. (1053 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Artificial intelligence, Bayesian inference, Machine learning, Bayesian probability and Pattern recognition. His study in Algorithm extends to Artificial intelligence with its themes. His Machine learning research also works with subjects such as

  • Hidden Markov model that connect with fields like Bounded rationality,
  • Dynamic causal modelling which connect with Functional neuroimaging.

He interconnects Generalized linear model, Data mining and Linear model in the investigation of issues within Bayesian probability. His research in Pattern recognition focuses on subjects like Electroencephalography, which are connected to Neuroimaging and Elementary cognitive task. The concepts of his Bayes' theorem study are interwoven with issues in Overfitting and Causal model.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (56.19%)
  • Bayesian inference (29.38%)
  • Machine learning (26.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (56.19%)
  • Neuroscience (18.56%)
  • Bayesian inference (29.38%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

William D. Penny mainly focuses on Artificial intelligence, Neuroscience, Bayesian inference, Inference and Set. The Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Machine learning, Empirical research and Pattern recognition. His work in the fields of Artificial neural network and Transfer of learning overlaps with other areas such as Field.

His study on Neuroimaging, Electroencephalography, Motor cortex and Prefrontal cortex is often connected to Variable as part of broader study in Neuroscience. His work is dedicated to discovering how Bayesian inference, Bayes' theorem are connected with Algorithm, Dissociation and Impulsivity and other disciplines. William D. Penny has researched Inference in several fields, including Stimulus and Multivariate analysis.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Behavioral modeling of human choices reveals dissociable effects of physical effort and temporal delay on reward devaluation. (62 citations)
  • The Neural Representation of Prospective Choice during Spatial Planning and Decisions. (49 citations)
  • Causal evidence that intrinsic beta-frequency is relevant for enhanced signal propagation in the motor system as shown through rhythmic TMS. (49 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning

Neuroscience, Bayes' theorem, Motor cortex, Brain mapping and Markov chain Monte Carlo are his primary areas of study. William D. Penny combines subjects such as Pattern recognition and Bayesian inference with his study of Bayes' theorem. His studies in Pattern recognition integrate themes in fields like Bayes estimator and Machine learning.

His research integrates issues of Beta Rhythm, Motor system, Dynamic causal modelling and Pyramidal tracts in his study of Motor cortex. His Brain mapping research integrates issues from Frontal lobe, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Prefrontal cortex. Many of his research projects under Artificial intelligence are closely connected to Detector and Group-level effects with Detector and Group-level effects, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic causal modelling.

    Karl J. Friston;Lee M. Harrison;William D. Penny

  • Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images

    W Penny;K Friston;J Ashburner;S Kiebel

  • Bayesian model selection for group studies.

    Klaas Enno Stephan;Will D. Penny;Jean Daunizeau;Rosalyn J. Moran

  • Comparing dynamic causal models

    William D. Penny;Klaas E. Stephan;Andrea Mechelli;Karl J. Friston

  • Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation

    Karl J. Friston;Jérémie Mattout;Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto;John Ashburner

  • Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling.

    K.E. Stephan;K.E. Stephan;W.D. Penny;R.J. Moran;H.E.M. den Ouden

  • Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution.

    Darren R. Gitelman;William D. Penny;John Ashburner;Karl J. Friston

  • Comparing families of dynamic causal models.

    Will D. Penny;Klaas E. Stephan;Klaas E. Stephan;Jean Daunizeau;Maria J. Rosa

  • Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory.

    Karl J. Friston;William D. Penny;Christophe Phillips;Stefan J. Kiebel

  • EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.

    Vladimir Litvak;Jérémie Mattout;Stefan J. Kiebel;Christophe Phillips

  • Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series

    Lee M. Harrison;William D. Penny;Karl J. Friston

  • Modelling functional integration:a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models

    W D Penny;K E Stephan;A Mechelli;K J Friston

  • Bayesian approaches to Gaussian mixture modeling

    S.J. Roberts;D. Husmeier;I. Rezek;W. Penny

  • Comparing Dynamic Causal Models using AIC, BIC and Free Energy

    William D. Penny

  • Post hoc Bayesian model selection

    Karl J. Friston;Will D. Penny

  • EEG-based communication: a pattern recognition approach

    W.D. Penny;S.J. Roberts;E.A. Curran;M.J. Stokes

  • Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors.

    William D. Penny;Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto;Karl J. Friston

  • Information theory, novelty and hippocampal responses: unpredicted or unpredictable?

    Bryan A. Strange;Andrew Duggins;William Penny;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Testing for nested oscillation

    W.D. Penny;E. Duzel;K.J. Miller;J.G. Ojemann

  • Posterior probability maps and SPMs.

    Karl J. Friston;William D. Penny

  • Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: current state and future extensions

    Klaas E Stephan;Lee M Harrison;Lee M Harrison;Stefan J Kiebel;Stefan J Kiebel;Olivier David

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl J. Friston
Karl J. Friston University College London
Stephen J. Roberts
Stephen J. Roberts University of Oxford
Klaas E. Stephan
Klaas E. Stephan University of Zurich
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Guillaume Flandin
Guillaume Flandin University College London
Gareth R. Barnes
Gareth R. Barnes University College London
Alexander P. Leff
Alexander P. Leff University College London
John Ashburner
John Ashburner University College London
Jean Daunizeau
Jean Daunizeau Grenoble Alpes University
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to related fields and flexible learning options. Many students start with a 2-year computer science degree online. These accelerated programs help you gain core technical skills quickly and can serve as a stepping stone to further education or fast-tracked entry-level roles in tech.

Computer science skills are also highly valued in engineering fields. If you're interested in environmental impact, an online environmental engineering degree combines science, technology, and sustainability—paving the way for careers in green tech and conservation.

For those drawn to machine design and manufacturing, an online mechanical engineering degree prepares you for roles in robotics, automotive, and aerospace industries. This discipline overlaps with computer science in areas like automation and simulation.

Additionally, a physics degree online offers foundational understanding of problem-solving, analysis, and programming—key competencies in both computational and scientific careers. Whether you focus on CS or explore another path, online degrees can be cost-effective and career-focused.

Best Scientists Citing William D. Penny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles