World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
14115
World Ranking
13056
National Ranking
326

Raoul J. Bino publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raoul J. Bino sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Raoul J. Bino D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raoul J. Bino sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Enzyme

His primary scientific interests are in Metabolomics, Metabolite, Botany, Mass spectrometry and Metabolome. His Metabolomics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Genetics, Proteomics and Computational biology. In his study, Biotechnology, Scale and Reversed-phase chromatography is strongly linked to Systems biology, which falls under the umbrella field of Proteomics.

His studies deal with areas such as Ferric and Solanum as well as Metabolite. His Mass spectrometry study is focused on Chromatography in general. Solanaceae, Lycopersicon, Lycopene and Function is closely connected to Mutant in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Metabolome.

His most cited work include:

  • Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool (617 citations)
  • Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (616 citations)
  • A Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolome Database for Tomato (433 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Botany, Metabolomics, Germination, Horticulture and Chromatography are his primary areas of study. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Pepper and Embryo. His Metabolomics research integrates issues from Metabolite, Genetics, Biotechnology and Computational biology.

His Metabolite study incorporates themes from Quantitative trait locus, Solanum and Orbitrap. His Germination research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cell cycle and Seedling. In general Chromatography study, his work on Mass spectrometry, Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and High-performance liquid chromatography often relates to the realm of High resolution and Ellagic acid, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (37.61%)
  • Metabolomics (25.64%)
  • Germination (24.79%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2014)?

  • Metabolomics (25.64%)
  • Chromatography (15.38%)
  • Mass spectrometry (13.68%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Raoul J. Bino spends much of his time researching Metabolomics, Chromatography, Mass spectrometry, Metabolite and Botany. The various areas that Raoul J. Bino examines in his Metabolomics study include Genetics, Arabidopsis and Biochemistry. The Chromatography study combines topics in areas such as Proton NMR and Urine.

The concepts of his Mass spectrometry study are interwoven with issues in In silico and Computational biology. His Metabolite research incorporates elements of Annotation, Orbitrap, Molecule and Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. His work in the fields of Botany, such as Provitamin a, overlaps with other areas such as Biochemical composition.

Between 2010 and 2014, his most popular works were:

  • Metabolite biodiversity in pepper (Capsicum) fruits of thirty-two diverse accessions: variation in health-related compounds and implications for breeding. (136 citations)
  • Carotenoid and fatty acid metabolism in nitrogen-starved Dunaliella salina, a unicellular green microalga (120 citations)
  • Structural elucidation and quantification of phenolic conjugates present in human urine after tea intake. (89 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Enzyme

His primary areas of investigation include Carotenoid, Biochemistry, Pepper, Pungency and Botany. His studies in Carotenoid integrate themes in fields like Metabolism and Fatty acid metabolism. His Biochemistry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as High-performance liquid chromatography, Chromatography and Metabolomics.

In general Pepper study, his work on Capsaicinoid, Capsicum chinense and Capsicum baccatum often relates to the realm of Ascorbic acid, thereby connecting several areas of interest. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Provitamin a and Vitamin C.

Best Publications

  • Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry

    Ric C H De Vos;Sofia Moco;Arjen Lommen;Joost J B Keurentjes

  • Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool

    Raoul J. Bino;Robert D. Hall;Oliver Fiehn;Joachim Kopka

  • A Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolome Database for Tomato

    Sofia Moco;Raoul J. Bino;Oscar Vorst;Harrie A. Verhoeven

  • A Novel Approach for Nontargeted Data Analysis for Metabolomics. Large-Scale Profiling of Tomato Fruit Volatiles

    Yury Tikunov;Arjen Lommen;C.H. Ric de Vos;Harrie A. Verhoeven

  • The genetics of plant metabolism

    J. J. B. Keurentjes;J. Y. Fu;C. H. R. de Vos;A. Lommen

  • Nontargeted metabolome analysis by use of Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Mass Spectrometry

    Asaph Aharoni;C. H. Ric de Vos;Harrie A. Verhoeven;Chris A. Maliepaard

  • Metabolomics technologies and metabolite identification

    Sofia Moco;Jacques Vervoort;Raoul J. Bino;Ric C.H. De Vos

  • Application of in vitro pollination, ovary culture, ovule culture and embryo rescue for overcoming incongruity barriers in interspecific Lilium crosses

    J.M. Van Tuyl;M.P. Van Diën;M.G.M. Van Creij;T.C.M. Van Kleinwee

  • Plant Metabolomics: The Missing Link in Functional Genomics Strategies

    Robert D. Hall;Michael H. Beale;Oliver Fiehn;Nigel Hardy

  • Metabolite biodiversity in pepper (Capsicum) fruits of thirty-two diverse accessions: variation in health-related compounds and implications for breeding.

    Yuni Wahyuni;Ana-Rosa Ballester;Enny Sudarmonowati;Raoul J. Bino

  • A proposed framework for the description of plant metabolomics experiments and their results

    Helen Ann Jenkins;Nigel William Hardy;Manfred Beckmann;John Draper

  • Carotenoid and fatty acid metabolism in light-stressed Dunaliella salina

    Packo P. Lamers;Carlien C.W. van de Laak;Petrouchka S. Kaasenbrood;Jeroen Lorier

  • Gene Expression Programs during Brassica oleracea Seed Maturation, Osmopriming, and Germination Are Indicators of Progression of the Germination Process and the Stress Tolerance Level

    Yasutaka Soeda;Maurice C.J.M. Konings;Oscar Vorst;Adele M.M.L. van Houwelingen

  • Characterization of ferric reducing activity in roots of Fe-deficient Phaseolus vulgaris

    H. F. Bienfait;R. J. Bino;A. M. Bliek;J. F. Duivenvoorden

  • The light-hyperresponsive high pigment-2dg mutation of tomato: alterations in the fruit metabolome

    Raoul J. Bino;C. H. Ric De Vos;Michal Lieberman;Robert D. Hall

  • Secondary metabolites of Capsicum species and their importance in the human diet.

    Yuni Wahyuni;Ana-Rosa Ballester;Enny Sudarmonowati;Raoul J. Bino

  • Tissue specialization at the metabolite level is perceived during the development of tomato fruit

    Sofia Moco;Esra Capanoglu;Yury Tikunov;Raoul J. Bino

  • Carotenoid and fatty acid metabolism in nitrogen-starved Dunaliella salina, a unicellular green microalga

    Packo P. Lamers;Marcel Janssen;Ric C.H. De Vos;Raoul J. Bino

  • Exploring and exploiting carotenoid accumulation in Dunaliella salina for cell-factory applications.

    Packo P. Lamers;Marcel Janssen;Ric C.H. De Vos;Raoul J. Bino

  • Cell Division and Subsequent Radicle Protrusion in Tomato Seeds Are Inhibited by Osmotic Stress But DNA Synthesis and Formation of Microtubular Cytoskeleton Are Not

    R. D. de Castro;A. A. M. van Lammeren;S. P. C. Groot;R. J. Bino

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven P. C. Groot
Steven P. C. Groot Wageningen University & Research
Robert Hall
Robert Hall Royal Holloway University of London
Ric C. H. de Vos
Ric C. H. de Vos Wageningen University & Research
Jacques Vervoort
Jacques Vervoort Wageningen University & Research
Henk W. M. Hilhorst
Henk W. M. Hilhorst University of Cape Town
Justin J. J. van der Hooft
Justin J. J. van der Hooft Wageningen University & Research
Arnaud G. Bovy
Arnaud G. Bovy Wageningen University & Research
Harro J. Bouwmeester
Harro J. Bouwmeester University of Amsterdam
Sergio Lanteri
Sergio Lanteri University of Turin
Ana-Rosa Ballester
Ana-Rosa Ballester Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Raoul J. Bino

Recently Published Articles