World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Justin J. J. van der Hooft

Justin J. J. van der Hooft

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 59 9968 9017 198 174 225 41887

Justin J. J. van der Hooft publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Justin J. J. van der Hooft between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Justin J. J. van der Hooft published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2020. 54 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2020. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 24 publications
2008 2025

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Justin J. J. van der Hooft: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 1
2010 0
2011 3
2012 7
2013 6
2014 6
2015 2
2016 7
2017 4
2018 13
2019 26
2020 37
2021 35
2022 34
2023 23
2024 30
2025 24
Total 259
Download as CSV

Justin J. J. van der Hooft publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin J. J. van der Hooft sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 225 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 225
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Justin J. J. van der Hooft D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin J. J. van der Hooft sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930 59
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2

    Evan Bolyen;Jai Ram Rideout;Matthew R. Dillon;Nicholas A. Bokulich

  • Author Correction: Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.

    Evan Bolyen;Jai Ram Rideout;Matthew R. Dillon;Nicholas A. Bokulich

  • Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment.

    Louis-Félix Nothias;Louis-Félix Nothias;Daniel Petras;Daniel Petras;Robin Schmid;Kai Dührkop

  • QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science

    Evan Bolyen;Jai Ram Rideout;Matthew R Dillon;Nicholas A Bokulich

  • Reproducible molecular networking of untargeted mass spectrometry data using GNPS

    Allegra T. Aron;Emily C. Gentry;Kerry L. McPhail;Louis Félix Nothias

  • MIBiG 2.0: a repository for biosynthetic gene clusters of known function.

    Satria A Kautsar;Kai Blin;Simon Shaw;Jorge C Navarro-Muñoz

  • The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure

    Augustin Scalbert;Lorraine Brennan;Claudine Manach;Cristina Andres-Lacueva

  • MIBiG 3.0: a community-driven effort to annotate experimentally validated biosynthetic gene clusters

    Unknown

  • The Natural Products Atlas: An Open Access Knowledge Base for Microbial Natural Products Discovery.

    Jeffrey A. van Santen;Gregoire Jacob;Amrit Leen Singh;Victor Aniebok

  • Topic modeling for untargeted substructure exploration in metabolomics

    Justin Johan Jozias van der Hooft;Joe Wandy;Michael P. Barrett;Karl E. V. Burgess

  • MolNetEnhancer: Enhanced Molecular Networks by Integrating Metabolome Mining and Annotation Tools

    Madeleine Ernst;Madeleine Ernst;Kyo Bin Kang;Kyo Bin Kang;Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez;Louis Felix Nothias

  • Propagating annotations of molecular networks using in silico fragmentation.

    Ricardo R. da Silva;Ricardo R. da Silva;Mingxun Wang;Louis Félix Nothias;Justin J.J. van der Hooft;Justin J.J. van der Hooft

  • QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science

    Unknown

  • antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation

    Unknown

  • Accelerating Metabolite Identification in Natural Product Research: Toward an Ideal Combination of Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry and NMR Profiling, in Silico Databases, and Chemometrics.

    Jean Luc Wolfender;Jean Marc Nuzillard;Justin J.J. Van Der Hooft;Jean Hugues Renault

  • Mass spectrometry searches using MASST

    Mingxun Wang;Alan K. Jarmusch;Fernando Vargas;Fernando Vargas;Alexander A. Aksenov

  • Human studies on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of tea polyphenols

    Michael N Clifford;Justin J J van der Hooft;Alan Crozier

  • Spec2Vec: Improved mass spectral similarity scoring through learning of structural relationships

    Unknown

  • Linking genomics and metabolomics to chart specialized metabolic diversity

    Justin J J van der Hooft;Hosein Mohimani;Anelize Bauermeister;Pieter C Dorrestein

  • BiG-SLiCE: A highly scalable tool maps the diversity of 1.2 million biosynthetic gene clusters.

    Satria A Kautsar;Justin J J van der Hooft;Dick de Ridder;Marnix H Medema

Frequent Co-Authors

Pieter C. Dorrestein
Pieter C. Dorrestein University of California, San Diego
Daniel Petras
Daniel Petras University of California, Riverside
Marnix H. Medema
Marnix H. Medema Wageningen University & Research
Ric C. H. de Vos
Ric C. H. de Vos Wageningen University & Research
Jacques Vervoort
Jacques Vervoort Wageningen University & Research
Nuno Bandeira
Nuno Bandeira University of California, San Diego
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Raoul J. Bino
Raoul J. Bino Wageningen University & Research
Curtis Huttenhower
Curtis Huttenhower Harvard University
Michael P. Barrett
Michael P. Barrett University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a chemistry degree opens doors to diverse online degrees and career paths. For those interested in the medical field, understanding is it hard to become a pharmacist offers valuable insight into this demanding yet rewarding profession. Pharmacists require a strong foundation in chemistry along with extensive training, making it a great option for chemistry graduates looking to advance their careers.

Chemistry graduates can also explore forensic science, a field that combines chemical knowledge with criminal investigation. Many reputable institutions offer programs highlighted in best online colleges for forensic science. These programs provide flexible learning paths while preparing students for careers in forensic analysis.

If you are drawn to specialized roles, becoming an autopsy technician is another pathway where chemistry skills are crucial. Understanding the autopsy tech salary and job outlook can help you evaluate this career's potential rewards and challenges.

For those interested in the psychological aspects of forensic science, pursuing an online master's in forensic psychology could be a perfect fit. This degree combines chemistry, criminology, and psychology, offering a unique interdisciplinary approach for students seeking advanced study and diverse career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Justin J. J. van der Hooft

Recently Published Articles