World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
38890
World Ranking
15034
National Ranking
3829

Daniel Petras publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Petras sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 182 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Daniel Petras D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Petras sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2

    Evan Bolyen;Jai Ram Rideout;Matthew R. Dillon;Nicholas A. Bokulich

  • Author Correction: Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.

    Evan Bolyen;Jai Ram Rideout;Matthew R. Dillon;Nicholas A. Bokulich

  • Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment.

    Louis-Félix Nothias;Louis-Félix Nothias;Daniel Petras;Daniel Petras;Robin Schmid;Kai Dührkop

  • QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science

    Evan Bolyen;Jai Ram Rideout;Matthew R Dillon;Nicholas A Bokulich

  • Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster.

    Marnix H. Medema;Marnix H. Medema;Renzo Kottmann;Pelin Yilmaz;Matthew Cummings

  • Systematic classification of unknown metabolites using high-resolution fragmentation mass spectra

    Kai Dührkop;Louis Felix Nothias;Markus Fleischauer;Raphael Reher

  • Reproducible molecular networking of untargeted mass spectrometry data using GNPS

    Allegra T. Aron;Emily C. Gentry;Kerry L. McPhail;Louis Félix Nothias

  • QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science

    Unknown

  • Ion identity molecular networking for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in the GNPS environment.

    Robin Schmid;Robin Schmid;Daniel Petras;Daniel Petras;Daniel Petras;Louis-Félix Nothias;Mingxun Wang

  • Mass spectrometry searches using MASST

    Mingxun Wang;Alan K. Jarmusch;Fernando Vargas;Fernando Vargas;Alexander A. Aksenov

  • Database-independent molecular formula annotation using Gibbs sampling through ZODIAC

    Marcus Ludwig;Louis-Félix Nothias;Kai Dührkop;Irina Koester;Irina Koester

  • Significance estimation for large scale metabolomics annotations by spectral matching

    Kerstin Scheubert;Franziska Hufsky;Daniel Petras;Mingxun Wang

  • The extracellular matrix protects Bacillus subtilis colonies from Pseudomonas invasion and modulates plant co-colonization.

    Carlos Molina-Santiago;John R. Pearson;Yurena Navarro;María Victoria Berlanga-Clavero

  • The gyrase inhibitor albicidin consists of p-aminobenzoic acids and cyanoalanine

    Stéphane Cociancich;Alexander Pesic;Daniel Petras;Stefanie Uhlmann

  • Auto-deconvolution and molecular networking of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry data

    Alexander A. Aksenov;Ivan Laponogov;Zheng Zhang;Sophie L. F. Doran

  • High-Resolution Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Enables Large Scale Molecular Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter

    Daniel Petras;Irina Koester;Ricardo Da Silva;Brandon M. Stephens

  • QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science

    Unknown

  • Biochemical Dissection of the Natural Diversification of Microcystin Provides Lessons for Synthetic Biology of NRPS

    Sabine Meyer;Jan-Christoph Kehr;Andi Mainz;Daniel Dehm

  • ReDU: a framework to find and reanalyze public mass spectrometry data

    Alan K. Jarmusch;Alan K. Jarmusch;Mingxun Wang;Mingxun Wang;Christine M. Aceves;Christine M. Aceves;Rohit S. Advani;Rohit S. Advani

  • Feature-based Molecular Networking in the GNPS Analysis Environment

    Louis Felix Nothias;Daniel Petras;Robin Schmid;Kai Dührkop

Frequent Co-Authors

Pieter C. Dorrestein
Pieter C. Dorrestein University of California, San Diego
Roderich D. Süssmuth
Roderich D. Süssmuth Technical University of Berlin
Justin J. J. van der Hooft
Justin J. J. van der Hooft Wageningen University & Research
Nuno Bandeira
Nuno Bandeira University of California, San Diego
Sebastian Böcker
Sebastian Böcker Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Juan J. Calvete
Juan J. Calvete Spanish National Research Council
Curtis Huttenhower
Curtis Huttenhower Harvard University
Kimberly A. Prather
Kimberly A. Prather University of California, San Diego
Manuela Raffatellu
Manuela Raffatellu University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in exploring Chemistry-related studies, branching into fields like forensic science and criminal justice can offer exciting career prospects. A forensic science bachelor degree online is an accessible option for many, combining chemistry principles with practical investigative skills. Such programs provide foundational knowledge valuable for roles in labs, law enforcement, or legal settings.

For those wishing to advance their expertise, pursuing an online masters degree in forensic psychology opens avenues to specialized roles that merge psychological assessment with crime analysis. This degree complements a chemistry background with insights into human behavior, enriching career versatility.

Understanding the financial investment is crucial. Tuition costs can vary widely; examining a criminal justice degree tuition breakdown helps prospective students plan effectively for their education without unexpected expenses.

Finally, exploring forensic career paths and salary information provides essential insight into job opportunities and earnings potential after graduation. This ensures informed decisions when selecting specific degree programs aligned with personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Petras

Recently Published Articles