World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
8006
World Ranking
11052
National Ranking
5767

Dean Sabatinelli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean Sabatinelli sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dean Sabatinelli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean Sabatinelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing.

    Margaret M. Bradley;Maurizio Codispoti;Dean Sabatinelli;Peter J. Lang

  • Emotional perception: Meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing

    Dean Sabatinelli;Erica E. Fortune;Qingyang Li;Aisha Siddiqui

  • Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention.

    Margaret M. Bradley;Dean Sabatinelli;Peter J. Lang;Jeffrey R. Fitzsimmons

  • Parallel amygdala and inferotemporal activation reflect emotional intensity and fear relevance

    Dean Sabatinelli;Margaret M. Bradley;Jeffrey R. Fitzsimmons;Peter J. Lang

  • Emotional Perception: Correlation of Functional MRI and Event-Related Potentials

    Dean Sabatinelli;Peter J. Lang;Andreas Keil;Margaret M. Bradley

  • Emotion regulation: Quantitative meta-analysis of functional activation and deactivation

    D.W. Frank;M. Dewitt;M. Hudgens-Haney;D.J. Schaeffer

  • Pleasure Rather Than Salience Activates Human Nucleus Accumbens and Medial Prefrontal Cortex

    Dean Sabatinelli;Margaret M. Bradley;Peter J. Lang;Vincent D. Costa

  • Affective picture perception : gender differences in visual cortex?

    Dean Sabatinelli;Tobias Flaisch;Margaret M. Bradley;Jeffrey R. Fitzsimmons

  • Emotional perception: Correspondence of early and late event-related potentials with cortical and subcortical functional MRI

    Dean Sabatinelli;Andreas Keil;David W. Frank;Peter J. Lang

  • Additive Effects of Emotional Content and Spatial Selective Attention on Electrocortical Facilitation

    Andreas Keil;Stephan Moratti;Dean Sabatinelli;Margaret M. Bradley

  • Emotional Imagery: Assessing Pleasure and Arousal in the Brain's Reward Circuitry

    Vincent D. Costa;Peter J. Lang;Dean Sabatinelli;Dean Sabatinelli;Francesco Versace;Francesco Versace

  • The Timing of Emotional Discrimination in Human Amygdala and Ventral Visual Cortex

    Dean Sabatinelli;Peter J. Lang;Margaret M. Bradley;Vincent D. Costa

  • Re-entrant Projections Modulate Visual Cortex in Affective Perception: Evidence From Granger Causality Analysis

    Andreas Keil;Dean Sabatinelli;Mingzhou Ding;Peter J. Lang

  • Affective startle modulation in anticipation and perception

    Dean Sabatinelli;Margaret M. Bradley;Peter J. Lang

  • Fleeting images: rapid affect discrimination in the visual cortex.

    Markus Junghöfer;Dean Sabatinelli;Margaret M. Bradley;Harald Thomas Schupp

  • Axonal Fiber Terminations Concentrate on Gyri

    Jingxin Nie;Lei Guo;Kaiming Li;Kaiming Li;Yonghua Wang

  • Sex differences in emotional perception: Meta analysis of divergent activation.

    Megan M. Filkowski;Rachel M. Olsen;Bryant Duda;Timothy J. Wanger

  • Modulation of late positive potentials by sexual images in problem users and controls inconsistent with “porn addiction”

    Nicole Prause;Vaughn R. Steele;Cameron Staley;Dean Sabatinelli

  • Electrocortical and electrodermal responses covary as a function of emotional arousal: A single-trial analysis

    Andreas Keil;J. Carson Smith;Bethany C. Wangelin;Dean Sabatinelli

  • Emotional scenes elicit more pronounced self-reported emotional experience and greater EPN and LPP modulation when compared to emotional faces

    Nathaniel Thom;Nathaniel Thom;Justin Knight;Rod Dishman;Dean Sabatinelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Lang
Peter Lang University of Bern
Margaret M. Bradley
Margaret M. Bradley University of Florida
Andreas Keil
Andreas Keil University of Florida
Brett A. Clementz
Brett A. Clementz University of Georgia
Elliot S. Gershon
Elliot S. Gershon University of Chicago
Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
John A. Sweeney
John A. Sweeney University of Cincinnati
Jennifer E. McDowell
Jennifer E. McDowell University of Georgia
Markus Junghöfer
Markus Junghöfer University of Münster
Carol A. Tamminga
Carol A. Tamminga The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dean Sabatinelli

Recently Published Articles