World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
15950
World Ranking
3952
National Ranking
1795

Daniel S. Zahm publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Zahm sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel S. Zahm D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Zahm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel S. Zahm is affiliated with Saint Louis University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience and psychology, contributing to a range of topics that intersect these fields.

The main fields of study for Daniel S. Zahm include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these areas, their work spans several subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Neurology

Daniel S. Zahm's research covers multiple topics, reflecting a broad interest in neural mechanisms and behavioral regulation:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The scientist has published in several prominent venues, with a concentration of work appearing in:

  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Daniel S. Zahm include:

  • "The Lateral Preoptic Area: A Novel Regulator of Reward Seeking and Neuronal Activity in the Ventral Tegmental Area," 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "A novel giant non-cholinergic striatal interneuron restricted to the ventrolateral striatum coexpresses Kv3.3 potassium channel, parvalbumin, and the vesicular GABA transporter," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "The novel giant striatal neurons are not cholinergic," 2022, Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Daniel S. Zahm include:

  • Lydia Lebenheim
  • Sam A. Booker
  • Christian Derst
  • Torsten Weiß
  • Clemens Gruber

Best Publications

  • Specificity in the projection patterns of accumbal core and shell in the rat.

    L. Heimer;D.S. Zahm;L. Churchill;P.W. Kalivas

  • On the significance of subterritories in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum

    D.S. Zahm;J.S. Brog

  • The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the “Accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum: Immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro‐gold

    Judith S. Brog;Aimee Salyapongse;Ariel Y. Deutch;Ariel Y. Deutch;Daniel S. Zahm

  • An integrative neuroanatomical perspective on some subcortical substrates of adaptive responding with emphasis on the nucleus accumbens.

    Daniel S. Zahm

  • Glutamatergic Afferents of the Ventral Tegmental Area in the Rat

    Stefanie Geisler;Christian Derst;Rüdiger W. Veh;Daniel S. Zahm

  • The mesopontine rostromedial tegmental nucleus: A structure targeted by the lateral habenula that projects to the ventral tegmental area of Tsai and substantia nigra compacta

    Thomas C. Jhou;Stefanie Geisler;Michela "Micky" Marinelli;Beth A. Degarmo

  • The accumbens: beyond the core-shell dichotomy.

    Heimer L;Alheid Gf;de Olmos Js;Groenewegen Hj

  • Two transpallidal pathways originating in the rat nucleus accumbens.

    D. S. Zahm;Lennart Heimer

  • Afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat‐anatomical substratum for integrative functions

    Stefanie Geisler;Daniel S. Zahm

  • Functional-anatomical implications of the nucleus accumbens core and shell subterritories.

    Daniel S. Zahm

  • Specificity in the efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat: comparison of the rostral pole projection patterns with those of the core and shell.

    D. S. Zahm;Lennart Heimer

  • Insulin gene expression and insulin synthesis in mammalian neuronal cells

    S.U. Devaskar;S.J. Giddings;P.A. Rajakumar;L.R. Carnaghi

  • Specificity in the Projections of Prefrontal and Insular Cortex to Ventral Striatopallidum and the Extended Amygdala

    Sheila M. Reynolds;Daniel S. Zahm

  • Morphological differences between projection neurons of the core and shell in the nucleus accumbens of the rat.

    G.E. Meredith;R. Agolia;M.P.M. Arts;H.J. Groenewegen

  • Ventral striatopallidal parts of the basal ganglia in the rat i. neurochemical compartmentation as reflected by the distributions of neurotensin and substance p immunoreactivity

    D. S. Zahm;L. Heimer

  • Neurotoxicity of MAO metabolites of catecholamine neurotransmitters: role in neurodegenerative diseases.

    William J Burke;Shu Wen Li;Hyung D Chung;David A Ruggiero

  • Altered dendritic spine plasticity in cocaine-withdrawn rats.

    Hao-wei Shen;Shigenobu Toda;Khaled Moussawi;Ashley Bouknight

  • The ventral striatopallidal parts of the basal ganglia in the rat--II. Compartmentation of ventral pallidal efferents.

    D.S. Zahm

  • Separate Prefrontal-Subcortical Circuits Mediate Different Components of Risk-Based Decision Making

    Jennifer R St Onge;Colin M Stopper;Daniel S Zahm;Stan B Floresco

  • 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde is the toxic dopamine metabolite in vivo: implications for Parkinson's disease pathogenesis.

    William J. Burke;Shu Wen Li;Evelyn A. Williams;Randal Nonneman

  • Evidence for the coexistence of glutamate decarboxylase and Met-enkephalin immunoreactivities in axon terminals of rat ventral pallidum.

    D.S. Zahm;L. Zaborszky;V.E. Alones;L. Heimer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lennart Heimer
Lennart Heimer University of Virginia
Peter W. Kalivas
Peter W. Kalivas Medical University of South Carolina
Gloria E. Meredith
Gloria E. Meredith Binghamton University
Gary W. Van Hoesen
Gary W. Van Hoesen University of Iowa
Michela \Micky\" Marinelli"
Michela \Micky\" Marinelli" The University of Texas at Austin
Anne Bérod
Anne Bérod Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Laszlo Zaborszky
Laszlo Zaborszky Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ariel Y. Deutch
Ariel Y. Deutch Vanderbilt University
James E. Krause
James E. Krause NeuroGenetic Pharmaceuticals (United States)
Rüdiger W. Veh
Rüdiger W. Veh Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Zahm

Trending Scientists