World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gary W. Van Hoesen

Gary W. Van Hoesen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
19590
World Ranking
2973
National Ranking
1380

Gary W. Van Hoesen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Van Hoesen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gary W. Van Hoesen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Van Hoesen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary W. Van Hoesen was affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States during their academic career.

Although detailed records of their published research papers are not available, this scientist was active in the academic community associated with the University of Iowa. No specific information on frequent co-authors, publication venues, or main fields and subfields of study has been documented.

There are no records of recent papers, book publications, or specific research topics tied to their name from the data provided.

There is no information available regarding awards, honors, or recognitions received by Gary W. Van Hoesen during their career.

The scientist is deceased, and past tense is used to describe their academic profile.

Best Publications

  • Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms

    Antonio R. Damasio;Hanna Damasio;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. II. Frontal lobe afferents.

    Gary W. Van Hoesen;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Deepak N. Pandya;Deepak N. Pandya;Nelson Butters;Nelson Butters

  • Cortico-striate projections in the rhesus monkey: the organization of certain cortico-caudate connections.

    Edward H. Yeterian;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Prefrontal cortex in humans and apes: a comparative study of area 10.

    Katerina Semendeferi;Este Armstrong;Axel Schleicher;Karl Zilles

  • Limbic and sensory connections of the inferior parietal lobule (area PG) in the rhesus monkey: a study with a new method for horseradish peroxidase histochemistry.

    Marek Marsel Mesulam;Marek Marsel Mesulam;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Deepak N. Pandya;Deepak N. Pandya;Norman Geschwind;Norman Geschwind

  • Entorhinal cortex pathology in Alzheimer's disease

    Gary W. van Hoesen;Bradley T. Hyman;Antonio R. Damasio

  • Acetylcholinesterase-rich projections from the basal forebrain of the rhesus monkey to neocortex.

    Marek Marsel Mesulam;Marek Marsel Mesulam;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Cortical Afferents to the Entorhinal Cortex of the Rhesus Monkey

    Gary W. Van Hoesen;Deepak N. Pandya;Nelson Butters

  • The Hippocampal Formation of the Primate Brain

    Douglas L. Rosene;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections

    Gary W. Van Hoesen;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Deepak N. Pandya;Deepak N. Pandya

  • Phosphorylation of Tau by Fyn: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease

    Gloria Lee;Ramasamy Thangavel;Vandana M. Sharma;Joel M. Litersky

  • The limbic lobe and its output channels: implications for emotional functions and adaptive behavior.

    Lennart Heimer;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Neural connections of the posteromedial cortex in the macaque.

    Josef Parvizi;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Joseph Buckwalter;Antonio Damasio

  • Temporal neocortical afferent connections to the amygdala in the rhesus monkey

    Andrew G. Herzog;Andrew G. Herzog;Gary W. Van Hoesen;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Cingulate input to the primary and supplementary motor cortices in the rhesus monkey: Evidence for somatotopy in areas 24c and 23c

    R J Morecraft;G W Van Hoesen

  • Connections of the Monkey Cingulate Cortex

    Gary W. Van Hoesen;Robert J. Morecraft;Brent A. Vogt

  • Widespread corticostriate projections from temporal cortex of the rhesus monkey.

    Gary W. Van Hoesen;Edward H. Yeterian;Risa Lavizzo-Mourey

  • The evolution of the frontal lobes: a volumetric analysis based on three-dimensional reconstructions of magnetic resonance scans of human and ape brains

    Katerina Semendeferi;Hanna Damasio;Randall Frank;Gary W. Van Hoesen

  • Alzheimer's disease: Glutamate depletion in the hippocampal perforant pathway zone

    B T Hyman;G W Van Hoesen;A R Damasio

  • Convergence of Limbic input to the cingulate motor cortex in the rhesus monkey

    Robert J Morecraft;Gary W Van Hoesen

  • Diencephalic amnesia.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio R. Damasio
Antonio R. Damasio University of Southern California
Deepak N. Pandya
Deepak N. Pandya Boston University
Douglas L. Rosene
Douglas L. Rosene Boston University
M.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam Northwestern University
Songlin Ding
Songlin Ding RMIT University
Lennart Heimer
Lennart Heimer University of Virginia
Robert J. Morecraft
Robert J. Morecraft University of South Dakota
Ana Solodkin
Ana Solodkin University of California, Irvine
Josef Parvizi
Josef Parvizi Stanford University
Daniel S. Zahm
Daniel S. Zahm Saint Louis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to diverse career paths. For those considering flexible learning options, there are several certifications that pay well, which can boost your credentials and earning potential without the need for a traditional campus experience.

If you’re looking for degrees with a manageable workload and attainable entry requirements, check out some of the easy online degrees that still lay a strong foundation for neuroscience-related roles. These programs are ideal for career shifters and those wanting a faster track into allied fields.

Neuroscience overlaps with many domains, including social work and behavioral analysis. If you’re interested in a mental health or support profession, consider affordable online MSW programs or look into bcba masters programs to support individuals with behavioral needs. Each pathway offers accessible, online training to launch your career while maintaining affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Gary W. Van Hoesen