World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3451 3185 1939 1749 126 63947

Robert Eisenberger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Eisenberger between 1966 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Eisenberger published across 58 years, from 1966 to 2023, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2011. 7 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2011. 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication
1966 2023

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Eisenberger: publications per year, 1966 to 2023
Year Publications
1966 2
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 3
1971 0
1972 1
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 5
1980 1
1981 1
1982 3
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 3
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 0
1992 3
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 5
1999 5
2000 0
2001 5
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 15
2012 2
2013 3
2014 3
2015 1
2016 5
2017 7
2018 2
2019 5
2020 3
2021 1
2022 6
2023 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Robert Eisenberger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Eisenberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 126
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Eisenberger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Eisenberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Robert Eisenberger is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences, with a focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The main topics of Eisenberger's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Ethics in Business and Education, Workplace Violence and Bullying, Cultural Differences and Values, Emotional Labor in Professions, Employment and Welfare Studies, and the Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering.

Eisenberger has published extensively across various notable venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Group & Organization Management
  • Journal of International Business Studies
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Management

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Eisenberger demonstrate a focus on perceived organizational support and its effects within organizations. These papers include:

  • Does Felt Obligation or Gratitude Better Explain the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Outcomes? (2023), Group & Organization Management
  • Organizational-level perceived support enhances organizational profitability (2022), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • How Leaders Drive Followers' Unethical Behavior (2022), Journal of Management
  • Social Distancing Initiatives and Perceived Organizational Support: It's the Intended Beneficiary That Counts (2022), Group & Organization Management
  • Perceived organizational support (POS) across 54 nations: A cross-cultural meta-analysis of POS effects (2020), Journal of International Business Studies

Throughout their career, Eisenberger has frequently collaborated with several researchers including Salar Mesdaghinia, Xueqi Wen, Blaine Austin Lewis, Kyoung Yong Kim, and Zihan Liu.

Their work intersects critical areas such as organizational support, ethical business conduct, and the psychological underpinnings of workplace behavior.

In 1999, Eisenberger was honored as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.

    Linda Rhoades;Robert Eisenberger

  • Perceived organizational support.

    Robert Eisenberger;Robin Huntington;Steven Hutchison;Debora Sowa

  • Reciprocation of perceived organizational support.

    Robert Eisenberger;Stephen Armeli;Barbara Rexwinkel;Patrick D. Lynch

  • Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.

    Robert Eisenberger;Florence Stinglhamber;Christian Vandenberghe;Ivan L. Sucharski

  • Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation

    Robert Eisenberger;Peter Fasolo;Valerie Davis-LaMastro

  • Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support.

    Linda Rhoades;Robert Eisenberger;Stephen Armeli

  • Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment, and Job Satisfaction

    Robert Eisenberger;Jim Cummings;Stephen Armeli;Patrick Lynch

  • Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory:

    James N. Kurtessis;Robert Eisenberger;Michael T. Ford;Louis C. Buffardi

  • Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?

    Robert Eisenberger;Judy Cameron

  • Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration

    Justin Aselage;Robert Eisenberger

  • When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance.

    Linda Rhoades Shanock;Robert Eisenberger

  • Perceived organizational support and police performance: the moderating influence of socioemotional needs.

    Stephen Armeli;Robert Eisenberger;Peter Fasolo;Patrick Lynch

  • Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees.

    Robert Eisenberger;Florence Stinglhamber

  • Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment

    Robert Eisenberger;Gokhan Karagonlar;Florence Stinglhamber;Pedro Neves

  • Perceived organizational support : Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees

    Patrick D. Lynch;Robert Eisenberger;Stephen Armeli

  • Does Pay for Performance Increase or Decrease Perceived Self-Determination and Intrinsic Motivation?

    Robert Eisenberger;Linda Rhoades;Judy Cameron

  • Perceived Organizational Support

    Florence Stinglhamber;Gaëtane Caesens;Laura Clark;Robert Eisenberger

  • Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation--negative, neutral and positive: comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999)

    R Eisenberger;W D Pierce;J Cameron

  • Incremental effects of reward on creativity.

    Robert Eisenberger;Linda Rhoades

  • Who Takes the most Revenge? Individual Differences in Negative Reciprocity Norm Endorsement

    Robert Eisenberger;Patrick Lynch;Justin Aselage;Stephanie Rohdieck

Frequent Co-Authors

Florence Stinglhamber
Florence Stinglhamber Université Catholique de Louvain
Stephen Armeli
Stephen Armeli Fairleigh Dickinson University
Lynn M. Shore
Lynn M. Shore Colorado State University
Thomas Becker
Thomas Becker University of South Florida
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas
Robert M. Kaplan
Robert M. Kaplan Stanford University
Lois E. Tetrick
Lois E. Tetrick George Mason University
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Luo Lu
Luo Lu National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career pathways. Many students choose to become licensed counselors and therapists, with Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) being a popular specialization. Online psychology degrees make it easier than ever to access high-quality education and prepare for these career paths from anywhere in the world.

Each US state has its own specific requirements for clinical practice. For example, prospective therapists can learn how to become an mft in Glendale or explore the steps involved in how to become an mft in Greensboro. Those interested in other regions might benefit from guides on how to become an mft in Henderson or how to become an mft in Honolulu.

Whether you aim to work as a clinical psychologist, counselor, or MFT, online degrees can help you balance your studies with other commitments. Explore your options, understand local licensing requirements, and begin building your career in psychology today.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Eisenberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles