World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
13334
World Ranking
4521
National Ranking
2119

Mohamed G. Gouda publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed G. Gouda sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 270 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mohamed G. Gouda D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed G. Gouda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mohamed G. Gouda is a researcher affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their primary research areas span across several branches of engineering and earth sciences.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Engineering
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Subfields of research focus on:

  • Geophysics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Core topics covered in Mohamed G. Gouda's work are:

  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Foreign Body Medical Cases
  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Their publication record includes papers in diverse venues, highlighting an interdisciplinary approach across engineering, geosciences, and medical case reports. Frequent publication venues where their work appears are:

  • International Petroleum Technology Conference
  • SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition
  • Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • The Proceedings of the Symposium on Environmental Engineering

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum Initiative on Parallel and Distributed Computing Core Topics for Undergraduates" (2024), published in HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • "Reducing the Uncertainties Associated with Unseen Borehole Inclination Changes between Directional Survey Stations on TVD Calculations and Post-Geological Interpretation" (2022), published in International Petroleum Technology Conference
  • "Water Based Mud High-Resolution Resistivity Images, Innovated Operational Practices to Enhance Log Quality in Lateral Boreholes Drilled with Multiple Fluid Systems." (2023), published in SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition
  • "Unnoticed ingestion of magnetic balls mimics acute appendicitis" (2022), published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
  • "OBM Resistivity Imaging in Formations with Wide Resistivity Range, Multi-Frequencies Acquisition to Identify Features of Different Characteristics" (2024), published in International Petroleum Technology Conference

The list of frequent coauthors working collaboratively with Mohamed G. Gouda includes:

  • M. Woldeamanuel
  • Mahmoud Hameed
  • Ahmed Abouzaid
  • M.M. Selim
  • Albaraa Alrushud

Best Publications

  • Secure group communications using key graphs

    Chung Kei Wong;Mohamed Gouda;Simon S. Lam

  • A line in the sand: a wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking

    A. Arora;P. Dutta;S. Bapat;V. Kulathumani

  • Secure group communications using key graphs

    Chung Kei Wong;Mohamed Gouda;Simon S. Lam

  • Reliable bursty convergecast in wireless sensor networks

    Hongwei Zhang;Anish Arora;Young-ri Choi;Mohamed G. Gouda

  • ExScal: elements of an extreme scale wireless sensor network

    A. Arora;R. Ramnath;E. Ertin;P. Sinha

  • Closure and convergence: a foundation of fault-tolerant computing

    A. Arora;M. Gouda

  • Batch rekeying for secure group communications

    Xiaozhou Steve Li;Yang Richard Yang;Mohamed G. Gouda;Simon S. Lam

  • Distributed reset

    A. Arora;M. Gouda

  • Diverse Firewall Design

    Alex X. Liu;Mohamed G. Gouda

  • Stabilizing communication protocols

    M.G. Gouda;N.J. Multari

  • Firewall design: consistency, completeness, and compactness

    M.G. Gouda;X.-Y.A. Liu

  • Memory requirements for silent stabilization

    Shlomi Dolev;Mohamed G. Gouda;Marco Schneider

  • Maintaining Digital Clocks In Step

    Anish Arora;Shlomi Dolev;Mohamed G. Gouda

  • Structured firewall design

    Mohamed G. Gouda;Alex X. Liu

  • Elements of network protocol design

    Mohamed G. Gouda

  • Token systems that self-stabilize

    G.M. Brown;M.G. Gouda;C.-L. Wu

  • Complete redundancy detection in firewalls

    Alex X. Liu;Mohamed G. Gouda

  • A model of stateful firewalls and its properties

    M.G. Gouda;A.X. Liu

  • Stabilizing unison

    M. G. Gouda;T. Herman

  • A secure address resolution protocol

    Mohamed G. Gouda;Chin-Tser Huang

  • NSF/IEEE-TCPP curriculum initiative on parallel and distributed computing: core topics for undergraduates

    Sushil K. Prasad;Almadena Chtchelkanova;Sajal Das;Frank Dehne

Frequent Co-Authors

Anish Arora
Anish Arora The Ohio State University
Alex X. Liu
Alex X. Liu Michigan State University
Simon S. Lam
Simon S. Lam The University of Texas at Austin
Sandeep S. Kulkarni
Sandeep S. Kulkarni Michigan State University
Shlomi Dolev
Shlomi Dolev Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Elmootazbellah Nabil Elnozahy
Elmootazbellah Nabil Elnozahy The University of Texas at Austin
Murat Demirbas
Murat Demirbas University at Buffalo, State University of New York
George Varghese
George Varghese University of California, Los Angeles
Prabal Dutta
Prabal Dutta University of California, Berkeley
Prasun Sinha
Prasun Sinha Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore options for studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s helpful to consider which programs align best with your career goals. Many students aim for most useful graduate degrees to boost their job prospects and open doors to advanced roles in the tech industry. A master’s in Computer Science can be particularly valuable for those seeking leadership or specialized positions.

For those starting their educational journey, pursuing an online associate degree in Computer Science offers flexibility and a cost-effective way to gain foundational knowledge. These programs are ideal for working adults or anyone requiring a more accessible entry point.

Cost is a common concern. Luckily, there are affordable online degree programs that allow you to earn a quality education without incurring heavy debt. Additionally, if you’re worried about past grades, some best online colleges that accept low gpa offer pathways to continue your education and enhance your qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Mohamed G. Gouda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles