World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
88
Citations
26023
World Ranking
655
National Ranking
290

Chemistry

D-Index
82
Citations
22433
World Ranking
3121
National Ranking
1035

Arturo A. Keller publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arturo A. Keller sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 282 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Arturo A. Keller D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arturo A. Keller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arturo A. Keller is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions across 73 publications in this domain.

The scientist's work spans several subfields, including:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Research topics covered extensively by Keller include:

  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

Arturo A. Keller has published frequently in several scholarly venues. The most common outlets for their work are:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • ACS ES&T Water
  • ACS Agricultural Science & Technology
  • Nature Food

Their recent papers include:

  • "Nanobiotechnology-based strategies for enhanced crop stress resilience," 2022, Nature Food
  • "Occurrence and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in a water reclamation and ecological reuse project," 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Simultaneous removal of pharmaceuticals and heavy metals from aqueous phase via adsorptive strategy: A critical review," 2023, Water Research
  • "Quantifying the Dynamics of Polystyrene Microplastics UV-Aging Process," 2021, Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • "Developing trends in nanomaterials and their environmental implications," 2023, Nature Nanotechnology

Frequent collaborators include the researchers Yuxiong Huang, Pabel Cervantes-Avilés, Vera I. Slaveykova, Lijuan Zhao, and Sanghamitra Majumdar.

Keller has also contributed to book publications, notably with Springer Nature, including the title Computational Intelligence for Water and Environmental Sciences published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Stability and Aggregation of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Natural Aqueous Matrices

    Arturo A Keller;Hongtao Wang;Dongxu Zhou;Hunter S Lenihan

  • Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials

    Arturo A. Keller;Suzanne McFerran;Anastasiya Lazareva;Sangwon Suh

  • Predicted Releases of Engineered Nanomaterials: From Global to Regional to Local

    Arturo A. Keller;Anastasiya Lazareva

  • Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: Costs, benefits, and applicability

    Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Jon R. Conway;Kendra Garner;Yuxiong Huang

  • Improved mechanical oil spill recovery using an optimized geometry for the skimmer surface.

    Victoria Broje;Arturo A Keller

  • Impacts of metal oxide nanoparticles on marine phytoplankton

    Robert J. Miller;Hunter S. Lenihan;Erik B. Muller;Nancy Tseng

  • TiO2 nanoparticles are phototoxic to marine phytoplankton.

    Robert J. Miller;Samuel Bennett;Arturo A. Keller;Scott Pease;Scott Pease

  • Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials

    Arturo A. Keller;Arturo A. Keller;Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Jon R. Conway;Jon R. Conway;Kendra L. Garner;Kendra L. Garner

  • Emerging patterns for engineered nanomaterials in the environment: a review of fate and toxicity studies

    Kendra L. Garner;Arturo A. Keller

  • Magnetic sulfide-modified nanoscale zerovalent iron (S-nZVI) for dissolved metal ion removal

    Yiming Su;Yiming Su;Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Arturo A. Keller;Yuxiong Huang

  • Influence of natural organic matter on the aggregation and deposition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

    Beng Joo Reginald Thio;Dongxu Zhou;Arturo A. Keller

  • Role of morphology in the aggregation kinetics of ZnO nanoparticles

    Dongxu Zhou;Arturo A. Keller

  • Toxic effects of copper-based nanoparticles or compounds to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa).

    Jie Hong;Cyren M. Rico;Lijuan Zhao;Adeyemi S. Adeleye

  • Aggregation, Dissolution, and Transformation of Copper Nanoparticles in Natural Waters

    Jon R. Conway;Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Jorge Gardea-Torresdey;Jorge Gardea-Torresdey;Arturo A. Keller;Arturo A. Keller

  • Transport of colloids in saturated porous media: A pore-scale observation of the size exclusion effect and colloid acceleration

    Sanya Sirivithayapakorn;Arturo Keller

  • Effect of surface coating and organic matter on the uptake of CeO2 NPs by corn plants grown in soil: Insight into the uptake mechanism.

    Lijuan Zhao;Jose R. Peralta-Videa;Armando Varela-Ramirez;Hiram Castillo-Michel

  • Clay Particles Destabilize Engineered Nanoparticles in Aqueous Environments

    Dongxu Zhou;Amr I. Abdel-Fattah;Arturo A. Keller

  • Comparative analysis of energy intensity and carbon emissions in wastewater treatment in USA, Germany, China and South Africa

    Hongtao Wang;Yi Yang;Arturo A. Keller;Xiang Li

  • Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model

    Kendra L. Garner;Sangwon Suh;Arturo A. Keller

  • Water-energy nexus for urban water systems: A comparative review on energy intensity and environmental impacts in relation to global water risks

    Mengshan Lee;Arturo A. Keller;Pen-Chi Chiang;Walter Den

  • Micromodel Observation of the Role of Oil Layers in Three-Phase Flow

    Arturo A. Keller;Martin J. Blunt;Arturo Paul V. Roberts

  • Influence of extracellular polymeric substances on the long-term fate, dissolution, and speciation of copper-based nanoparticles

    Adeyemi S. Adeleye;Jon R. Conway;Thomas Perez;Thomas Perez;Paige Rutten;Paige Rutten

Frequent Co-Authors

Hunter S. Lenihan
Hunter S. Lenihan University of California, Santa Barbara
Jorge L. Gardea-Torresdey
Jorge L. Gardea-Torresdey The University of Texas at El Paso
Robert J. Miller
Robert J. Miller University of California, Santa Barbara
Fengting Li
Fengting Li Tongji University
Jose R. Peralta-Videa
Jose R. Peralta-Videa The University of Texas at El Paso
Sangwon Suh
Sangwon Suh University of California, Santa Barbara
Yalei Zhang
Yalei Zhang Tongji University
Roger M. Nisbet
Roger M. Nisbet University of California, Santa Barbara
Jason C. White
Jason C. White Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
Lutz Mädler
Lutz Mädler University of Bremen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse pathways for further education and career advancement. Many students complement their scientific background with interdisciplinary skills by pursuing an online MPA degrees. These programs enhance leadership and policy-making expertise, crucial for roles in environmental management and sustainable development.

For those interested in understanding societal impacts of environmental issues, an online sociology degree bachelors offers valuable insights into social behavior and community dynamics, which are key to crafting effective environmental policies.

Advanced scholarship is also within reach through programs like doctorate degree online no dissertation, providing flexible doctoral education options without the traditional dissertation barrier. This is ideal for professionals seeking to deepen expertise while balancing career commitments.

Additionally, online eds to edd programs facilitate a smooth transition for educators and researchers aiming to elevate their qualifications and impact in academic or policy environments related to environmental science.

Best Scientists Citing Arturo A. Keller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles