World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
57
Citations
8594
World Ranking
2336
National Ranking
133

Mark Jessell publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Jessell sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 261 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Mark Jessell D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Jessell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Jessell is affiliated with the University of Western Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, focusing primarily on areas such as Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Artificial Intelligence, Ocean Engineering, and Geology. Their body of work encompasses over 100 publications, denoting a wide-ranging engagement with these scientific domains.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics including Geological Modeling and Analysis, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Geological and Geochemical Analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, and Soil Geostatistics and Mapping.

Mark Jessell has frequently published in various scientific venues, notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Precambrian Research
  • Tectonophysics
  • Solid Earth

The scientist's collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Mark Lindsay, Jérémie Giraud, Vitaliy Ogarko, Guillaume Pirot, and Mahtab Rashidifard.

Recent notable publications authored or co-authored by Mark Jessell cover a range of topics and advancements in geological and geophysical research:

  • Three-dimensional geological modeling and spatial analysis from geotechnical borehole data using an implicit surface and marching tetrahedra algorithm, 2021, published in Engineering Geology
  • 3D geological structure inversion from Noddy-generated magnetic data using deep learning methods, 2021, published in Computers & Geosciences
  • LoopStructural 1.0: time-aware geological modelling, 2021, published in Geoscientific Model Development
  • Disjoint interval bound constraints using the alternating direction method of multipliers for geologically constrained inversion: Application to gravity data, 2020, published in Geophysics
  • Paleoproterozoic gold events in the southern West African Craton: review and synopsis, 2021, published in Mineralium Deposita

Best Publications

  • Juvenile Paleoproterozoic crust evolution during the Eburnean orogeny (~2.2-2.0Ga), western Burkina Faso

    Lenka Baratoux;Václav Metelka;Václav Metelka;Séta Naba;Mark W. Jessell

  • Three-dimensional geological modelling of potential-field data

    Mark Jessell

  • Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: Analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia

    Mark Lindsay;Mark Lindsay;Laurent Ailleres;Mark Jessell;Eric Anthony de Kemp

  • Revised Eburnean geodynamic evolution of the gold-rich southern Ashanti Belt, Ghana, with new field and geophysical evidence of pre-Tarkwaian deformations

    Stéphane Perrouty;Stéphane Perrouty;Laurent Aillères;Mark W. Jessell;Lenka Baratoux

  • Grain-boundary migration microstructures in a naturally deformed quartzite

    M.W Jessell

  • Modern-style plate subduction preserved in the Palaeoproterozoic West African craton

    Jérôme Ganne;V. De Andrade;V. De Andrade;R.F. Weinberg;O. Vidal

  • Next Generation Three-Dimensional Geologic Modeling and Inversion

    Mark Walter Jessell;Laurent Ailleres;Eric Anthony de Kemp;Mark Lindsay

  • A geophysically constrained litho-structural analysis of the Eburnean greenstone belts and associated granitoid domains, Burkina Faso, West Africa

    Václav Metelka;Václav Metelka;Lenka Baratoux;Séta Naba;Mark W. Jessell

  • Towards an integrated inversion of geoscientific data: What price of geology?

    Mark Jessell;Laurent Ailleres;Eric Anthony de Kemp

  • A simulation of the temperature dependence of quartz fabrics

    M. W. Jessell;G. S. Lister

  • Asymmetric deformation in the backarc region of the Kuril arc, northwest Pacific: New insights from analogue modeling

    Wouter Pieter Schellart;Mark Jessell;Gordon Lister

  • Elle: the numerical simulation of metamorphic and deformation microstructures

    Mark Jessell;Paul Bons;Lynn Evans;Terence Barr

  • The topology of geology 1: Topological analysis

    Samuel T. Thiele;Mark W. Jessell;Mark Lindsay;Vitaliy Ogarko

  • Petrological and geochronological constraints on lower crust exhumation during Paleoproterozoic (Eburnean) orogeny, NW Ghana, West African Craton

    S Block;J Ganne;L Baratoux;Armin Zeh

  • Converging flow and anisotropy cause large-scale folding in Greenland's ice sheet.

    Paul D. Bons;Daniela Jansen;Felicitas Mundel;Catherine C. Bauer

  • Analogue modeling of arc and backarc deformation in the New Hebrides arc and North Fiji Basin

    Wouter Schellart;G S Lister;Mark W Jessell

  • Experimental simulation of the formation of fibrous veins by localised dissolution-precipitation creep

    Paul D. Bons;Mark W. Jessell

  • Structural geophysics: Integrated structural and geophysical modelling

    Mark W. Jessell;Rick K. Valenta

  • Inferring geological structures using wavelet-based multiscale edge analysis and forward models

    Darren J. Holden;Nicholas J. Archibald;Fabio Boschetti;Mark W. Jessell

  • A geodynamic model for the Paleoproterozoic (ca. 2.27-1.96 Ga) Birimian Orogen of the southern West African Craton - Insights into an evolving accretionary-collisional orogenic system

    Mikael Grenholm;Mark Jessell;Nicolas Thébaud

  • Grain boundary migration and fabric development in experimentally deformed octachloropropane

    M.W. Jessell

  • Bedding parallel veins and their relationship to folding

    M.W. Jessell;C.E. Willman;D.R. Gray

  • Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty estimation on structural data in implicit 3-D geological modeling, a guide for disturbance distribution selection and parameterization

    Evren Pakyuz-Charrier;Mark Lindsay;Vitaliy Ogarko;Jeremie Giraud

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul D. Bons
Paul D. Bons University of Tübingen
Laurent Ailleres
Laurent Ailleres Monash University
Sandra Piazolo
Sandra Piazolo University of Leeds
David Baratoux
David Baratoux Paul Sabatier University
Stefano Salvi
Stefano Salvi Paul Sabatier University
Richard E. Ernst
Richard E. Ernst Carleton University
Peter G Betts
Peter G Betts Monash University
Ulf Söderlund
Ulf Söderlund Lund University
Gordon S. Lister
Gordon S. Lister University of Queensland
Ricardo A. Lebensohn
Ricardo A. Lebensohn Los Alamos National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens diverse career opportunities that often intersect with complementary fields. For instance, some professionals enhance their skills by pursuing an mfa degree online, integrating creativity with scientific knowledge in environmental communication or policy advocacy.

Those interested in organizational roles within environmental firms or agencies might consider an accredited online masters degree in human resource management. This pathway strengthens leadership and people management skills essential in today’s interdisciplinary teams.

Moreover, Earth Science offers inclusive opportunities that embrace learners at all stages. The best degrees for older adults highlight flexible online programs, allowing seasoned professionals or those seeking career changes to pursue their passions without traditional barriers.

For research and information management roles, especially in environmental libraries or archives, an ala accredited mls programs provide valuable expertise in handling scientific data and resources, supporting ongoing Earth Science advancements.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Jessell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles