World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5828
World Ranking
8558
National Ranking
3640

Thomas N. Parks publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas N. Parks sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 71 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas N. Parks D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas N. Parks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas N. Parks is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their academic profile reflects engagement with the institution but does not list specific research outputs or detailed publication records available for further elaboration.

The data provides no information on recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues, which limits detailed insight into their collaborations or preferred journals and conferences. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards associated with Thomas N. Parks.

No specialized fields or subfields of study are mentioned, nor are there identified main topics of work. This absence of specific thematic focus or documented research areas suggests either a highly interdisciplinary approach or limited publicly available bibliometric data.

With no citations, awards, or known research collaborations documented, the professional profile of Thomas N. Parks remains focused primarily on institutional affiliation rather than a detailed publication or research portfolio.

Best Publications

  • Induced acetylcholinesterase-rich layer in rat dentate gyrus following entorhinal lesions.

    Gary Lynch;Dee Ann Matthews;Sarah Mosko;Thomas Parks

  • Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris.

    Edwin W. Rubel;Thomas N. Parks

  • Afferent influences on the development of the brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Otocyst ablation

    Thomas N. Parks;Thomas N. Parks;Thomas N. Parks

  • Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: organization of projections from n. magnocellularis to n. laminaris.

    Thomas N. Parks;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Organization and development of the brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: primary afferent projections.

    Thomas N. Parks;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Conantokin-T. A gamma-carboxyglutamate containing peptide with N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist activity.

    Julie A. Haack;Jean Rivier;Thomas N. Parks;E. Edward Mena

  • Functional synapse elimination in the developing avian cochlear nucleus with simultaneous reduction in cochlear nerve axon branching

    H Jackson;TN Parks

  • Functional consequences of posttranslational isomerization of Ser46 in a calcium channel toxin

    Steven D. Heck;Chester J. Siok;Karen J. Krapcho;Paul R. Kelbaugh

  • Rapid dendritic atrophy following deafferentation: An EM morphometric analysis

    Francine M. Benes;Thomas N. Parks;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Primary innervation of the avian and mammalian cochlear nucleus.

    David K Ryugo;Thomas N Parks

  • SPIDER TOXINS: Recent Applications in Neurobiology

    Hunter Jackson;Thomas N. Parks

  • Relocation and hyperdevelopment of the dentate gyrus commissural system after entorhinal lesions in immature rats.

    G.S. Lynch;S. Mosko;T. Parks;C.W. Cotman

  • The AMPA receptors of auditory neurons.

    Thomas N Parks

  • Origin of ascending auditory projections to the nucleus mesencephalicus lateralis pars dorsalis in the chicken

    John W. Conlee;John W. Conlee;Thomas N. Parks

  • Morphology of axosomatic endings in an avian cochlear nucleus: Nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken

    Thomas N. Parks

  • Changes in the length and organization of nucleus laminaris dendrites after unilateral otocyst ablation in chick embryos.

    Thomas N. Parks

  • Type iia ('anti-hu') antineuronal antibodies produce destruction of rat cerebellar granule neurons in vitro

    John E. Greenlee;Thomas N. Parks;Kurt A. Jaeckle

  • Modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated increases in cytosolic calcium in cultured rat cerebellar granule cells.

    T.N. Parks;L.D. Artman;N. Alasti;E.F. Nemeth

  • Evidence for selective post-lesion axonal growth in the dentate gyrus of the rat

    Gary Lynch;Brent Stanfield;Thomas Parks;Carl W. Cotman

  • Characterization of the AMPA‐Activated Receptors Present on Motoneurons

    Ann Greig;Sean D. Donevan;Tahmina J. Mujtaba;Thomas N. Parks

  • Developmental Changes in the Subcellular Localization of Calretinin

    Nicola J. Hack;Mark C. Wride;Kathleen M. Charters;Stanley B. Kater

Frequent Co-Authors

Edwin W. Rubel
Edwin W. Rubel University of Washington
Mahendra S. Rao
Mahendra S. Rao National Institutes of Health
Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine
Baldomero M. Olivera
Baldomero M. Olivera University of Utah
Jean Rivier
Jean Rivier Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Lourdes J. Cruz
Lourdes J. Cruz University of Utah
Stanley B. Kater
Stanley B. Kater Colorado State University
Francine M. Benes
Francine M. Benes Harvard University
David K. Ryugo
David K. Ryugo Garvan Institute of Medical Research
David M. Jacobowitz
David M. Jacobowitz National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas N. Parks