World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roderick R. McInnes

Roderick R. McInnes

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 59 3234 3060 122 115 134 13218

Roderick R. McInnes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roderick R. McInnes between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roderick R. McInnes published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2007. 4 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2007. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1972 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roderick R. McInnes: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 3
1981 3
1982 1
1983 0
1984 3
1985 0
1986 3
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 4
1993 6
1994 9
1995 4
1996 6
1997 7
1998 11
1999 2
2000 6
2001 5
2002 3
2003 1
2004 7
2005 4
2006 4
2007 25
2008 21
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 2
2013 4
2014 3
2015 2
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 4
Total 177
Download as CSV

Roderick R. McInnes publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick R. McInnes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 125–134 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 134 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217 134
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Roderick R. McInnes D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderick R. McInnes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162 59
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Roderick R. McInnes is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and focuses primarily on research within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a specific emphasis on Molecular Biology.

Their research encompasses several specialized topics, including:

  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA regulation and disease

Roderick R. McInnes has contributed to the scientific literature with papers published in known venues such as Genome Biology, Genes & Development, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Notable publications include:

  • "The Deep Genome Project", 2020, Genome biology
  • "Uncovering a mammalian neural-specific poly(A) binding protein with unique properties", 2023, Genes & Development
  • "The microtubule-binding protein EML3 is required for mammalian embryonic growth and cerebral cortical development; Eml3 null mice are a model of cobblestone brain malformation", 2025, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their frequent coauthors include Isabelle Carrier, with whom they have collaborated on multiple occasions, as well as K. C. Kent Lloyd, David J. Adams, Gareth Baynam, and Arthur L. Beaudet.

Best Publications

  • Retinal Stem Cells in the Adult Mammalian Eye

    Vincent Tropepe;Brenda L. K. Coles;Bernard J. Chiasson;D. Jonathan Horsford

  • Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor

    Carol L. Freund;Cheryl Y. Gregory-Evans;Takahisa Furukawa;Myrto Papaioannou

  • Ocular retardation mouse caused by Chx10 homeobox null allele: impaired retinal progenitor proliferation and bipolar cell differentiation.

    Margit Burmeister;Jakub Novak;Mei Ying Liang;Sharmila Basu

  • Loss of Inhibitory Interneurons in the Dorsal Spinal Cord and Elevated Itch in Bhlhb5 Mutant Mice

    Sarah E. Ross;Alan R. Mardinly;Alejandra E. McCord;Jonathan Zurawski

  • Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells

    Brenda L. K. Coles;Brigitte Angénieux;Tomoyuki Inoue;Katia Del Rio-Tsonis

  • Common acute lymphocytic leukemia antigen is identical to neutral endopeptidase.

    M. Letarte;S. Vera;R. Tran;J. B. L. Addis

  • E.coli host strains significantly affect the quality of small scale plasmid DNA preparations used for sequencing

    R G Taylor;D C Walker;R R McInnes

  • Photoreceptor peripherin is the normal product of the gene responsible for retinal degeneration in the rds mouse

    Greg Connell;Roger Bascom;Laurie Molday;Delyth Reid

  • A one-hit model of cell death in inherited neuronal degenerations

    Geoff Clarke;Richard A. Collins;Blair R. Leavitt;David F. Andrews

  • De novo mutations in the CRX homeobox gene associated with Leber congenital amaurosis.

    C. L. Freund;Q.-L. Wang;Shiming Chen;B. L. Muskat

  • A Range of Clinical Phenotypes Associated with Mutations in CRX, a Photoreceptor Transcription-Factor Gene

    Melanie M. Sohocki;Lori S. Sullivan;Helen A. Mintz-Hittner;David Birch

  • VSX1: A gene for posterior polymorphous dystrophy and keratoconus

    Elise Héon;Alex Greenberg;Kelly K. Kopp;David Rootman

  • Human microphthalmia associated with mutations in the retinal homeobox gene CHX10.

    E Ferda Percin;L A Ploder;J J Yu;K Arici

  • Pax-6, Prox 1, and Chx10 homeobox gene expression correlates with phenotypic fate of retinal precursor cells.

    T Belecky-Adams;S Tomarev;H S Li;L Ploder

  • Chx10 repression of Mitf is required for the maintenance of mammalian neuroretinal identity

    D. Jonathan Horsford;Minh-Thanh T. Nguyen;Grant C. Sellar;Rashmi Kothary

  • PROGRESS TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF INHERITED PHOTORECEPTOR DEGENERATIONS

    Laura R. Pacione;Michael J. Szego;Sakae Ikeda;Patsy M. Nishina

  • Neto1 is a novel CUB-domain NMDA receptor-interacting protein required for synaptic plasticity and learning.

    David Ng;Graham M Pitcher;Graham M Pitcher;Rachel K Szilard;Andréa Sertié

  • Rom-1 is required for rod photoreceptor viability and the regulation of disk morphogenesis.

    Geoff Clarke;Andrew F.X. Goldberg;Danka Vidgen;Leslie Collins

  • The Genomic, Biochemical, and Cellular Responses of the Retina in Inherited Photoreceptor Degenerations and Prospects for the Treatment of These Disorders

    Alexa N. Bramall;Alan F. Wright;Samuel G. Jacobson;Roderick R. McInnes

  • Renal handling of phosphate in vivo and in vitro by the X-linked hypophosphatemic male mouse: evidence for a defect in the brush border membrane.

    Harriet S. Tenenhouse;Charles R. Scriver;Roderick McInnes;Francis H. Glorieux

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Nussbaum
Robert L. Nussbaum University of California, San Francisco
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania
John Christodoulou
John Christodoulou University of Melbourne
David G. Birch
David G. Birch The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
Val C. Sheffield
Val C. Sheffield University of Iowa
Charles R. Scriver
Charles R. Scriver McGill University
Derek van der Kooy
Derek van der Kooy University of Toronto
Artur V. Cideciyan
Artur V. Cideciyan University of Pennsylvania
John R. Heckenlively
John R. Heckenlively University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Genetics opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers in healthcare and research. Many professionals interested in genetics also consider allied fields, some of which offer flexible online learning and rapid advancement opportunities.

Healthcare roles like nursing and medical assisting remain highly relevant. For registered nurses seeking to broaden their skills, the best online rn to bsn programs can be completed without the requirement for traditional clinicals. These programs allow nurses to earn higher qualifications while maintaining work-life balance.

If you’re aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles, consider the fastest bsn to dnp program for direct entry into doctoral nursing. For those starting out or returning to healthcare, becoming a medical assistant can be a swift pathway, as highlighted by the medical assistant program options, which can sometimes be completed in as little as six weeks.

Exploring advanced nursing further, dnp programs online provide accessible routes to a Doctor of Nursing Practice for those interested in clinical leadership, policy, or genetics-focused patient care. These flexible degree options can help pave the way for diverse career growth in the rapidly evolving field of genetics and allied healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Roderick R. McInnes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles