World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5258
World Ranking
8377
National Ranking
712

Detlev Schild publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Detlev Schild sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Detlev Schild D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Detlev Schild sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Detlev Schild is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses diverse topics including Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research, and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies.

Detlev Schild has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed publications, some recent examples being:

  • Developmental GABA polarity switch and neuronal plasticity in Bioengineered Neuronal Organoids, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Principles of odor coding in vertebrates and artificial chemosensory systems, 2021, Physiological Reviews
  • Corrigendum: TAp73 is a central transcriptional regulator of airway multiciliogenesis, 2024, Genes & Development

Their collaborative work includes partnerships with several frequent co-authors, such as Maria-Patapia Zafeiriou, Guobin Bao, James E. Hudson, Rashi Halder, and Alica Blenkle.

Detlev Schild's publications have appeared in notable journals including Nature Communications, Physiological Reviews, and Genes & Development, reflecting a range of research dissemination venues within the neurosciences.

Best Publications

  • Transduction Mechanisms in Vertebrate Olfactory Receptor Cells

    Detlev Schild;Diego Restrepo

  • Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina

    Kristian Franze;Jens Grosche;Serguei N. Skatchkov;Stefan Schinkinger

  • Olfactory Coding with Patterns of Response Latencies

    Stephan Junek;Eugen Kludt;Fred Wolf;Detlev Schild

  • Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy in Small Cytosolic Compartments Depends Critically on the Diffusion Model Used

    Arne Gennerich;Detlev Schild

  • Second messenger signaling in olfactory transduction

    Diego Restrepo;John H. Teeter;Detlev Schild

  • Ratiometric high-resolution imaging of JC-1 fluorescence reveals the subcellular heterogeneity of astrocytic mitochondria

    Vera C. Keil;Frank Funke;Andre Zeug;Detlev Schild

  • Müller Glial Cell-Provided Cellular Light Guidance through the Vital Guinea-Pig Retina

    Silke Agte;Stephan Junek;Stephan Junek;Stephan Junek;Sabrina Matthias;Elke Ulbricht

  • Principles of odor coding and a neural network for odor discrimination

    Detlev Schild

  • Bioelectronic noses: A status report Part I

    W. Göpel;Ch. Ziegler;H. Breer;D. Schild

  • Developmental GABA polarity switch and neuronal plasticity in Bioengineered Neuronal Organoids

    Maria-Patapia Zafeiriou;Guobin Bao;James Hudson;James Hudson;Rashi Halder;Rashi Halder

  • Whole-cell currents in olfactory receptor cells of Xenopus laevis.

    D. Schild

  • Small conductance potassium channels cause an activity-dependent spike frequency adaptation and make the transfer function of neurons logarithmic.

    Jutta Engel;Howard A. Schultens;Detlev Schild

  • Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate-mediated calcium signalling in effector T cells regulates autoimmunity of the central nervous system.

    Chiara Cordiglieri;Francesca Odoardi;Bo Zhang;Merle Nebel

  • Localization of calcium entry through calcium channels in olfactory receptor neurones using a laser scanning microscope and the calcium indicator dyes Fluo-3 and Fura-Red

    D. Schild;A. Jung;H.A. Schultens

  • Principles of odor coding in vertebrates and artificial chemosensory systems.

    Ivan Manzini;Detlev Schild;Corrado Di Natale

  • Differential detection of potentially hazardous Fusarium species in wheat grains by an electronic nose.

    Jakob Eifler;Eugenio Martinelli;Marco Santonico;Rosamaria Capuano

  • Contactins in the central nervous system: role in health and disease

    Madhurima Chatterjee;Detlev Schild;Charlotte E Teunissen

  • Aggregation of F-Actin in Olfactory Glomeruli: a Common Feature of Glomeruli Across Phyla

    Wolfgang Rössler;Joško Kuduz;Friedrich W. Schürmann;Detlev Schild

  • Important Contribution of α-Neurexins to Ca2+-Triggered Exocytosis of Secretory Granules

    Irina Dudanova;Simon Sedej;Mohiuddin Ahmad;Henriette Masius

  • Multidrug resistance transporters in the olfactory receptor neurons of Xenopus laevis tadpoles

    Ivan Manzini;Detlev Schild

  • Sodium/calcium exchanger in olfactory receptor neurones of Xenopus laevis.

    Anita Jung;Fritz Walter Lischka;Jutta Engel;Detlev Schild

  • Glutamate and N-acetylaspartylglutamate block HVA calcium currents in frog olfactory bulb interneurons via an mGluR2/3-like receptor

    J. Bischofberger;D. Schild

  • Cannabinoid action in the olfactory epithelium

    Dirk Czesnik;Detlev Schild;Josko Kuduz;Ivan Manzini

  • Nucleotide-induced Ca2+ signaling in sustentacular supporting cells of the olfactory epithelium.

    Thomas Hassenklöver;Silvia Kurtanska;Ilonka Bartoszek;Stephan Junek

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Rössler
Wolfgang Rössler University of Würzburg
Josef Bischofberger
Josef Bischofberger University of Basel
Corrado Di Natale
Corrado Di Natale University of Rome Tor Vergata
Eugenio Martinelli
Eugenio Martinelli University of Rome Tor Vergata
Ingemar Lundström
Ingemar Lundström Linköping University
Roberto Paolesse
Roberto Paolesse University of Rome Tor Vergata
Dietmar Riedel
Dietmar Riedel Max Planck Society
Diego Restrepo
Diego Restrepo University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Andre Fischer
Andre Fischer University of Göttingen
Fred Wolf
Fred Wolf Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a variety of career paths in healthcare, research, and technology. While a neuroscience degree can be challenging, it's also one of the highest paying majors for graduates seeking lucrative professions.

Online education is becoming increasingly popular for those wanting flexibility or affordability. If cost is a major consideration, exploring the cheapest online college options that accept FAFSA can help reduce financial barriers.

For students aiming to quickly enter the workforce or boost existing credentials, there are many online certifications that align with neuroscience or healthcare and pay well. These can be efficient stepping stones toward specialized or higher-paying roles.

Finally, some students may seek easy degrees to get online that offer viable entry points into related fields or prepare them for advanced study later.

Best Scientists Citing Detlev Schild

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles