World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Christian Ell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Ell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Christian Ell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Ell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christian Ell is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany and specializes in medical research with a strong focus on esophageal and gastrointestinal diseases. Their work encompasses surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, molecular biology, and gastroenterology.

The scientist's research predominantly centers on esophageal cancer and related pathologies. Key areas of study include:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Microscopic Colitis
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Research

Recent publications illustrate a focus on clinical and genetic research within gastroenterology. Selected papers include:

  • "Hybrid APC in Combination With Resection for the Endoscopic Treatment of Neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus: A Prospective, Multicenter Study" (2021) published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • "Germline variation in the insulin-like growth factor pathway and risk of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma" (2020) published in Carcinogenesis
  • "eQTL Set-Based Association Analysis Identifies Novel Susceptibility Loci for Barrett Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma" (2022) published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • "Safety of endoscopist-guided sedation in a low-risk collective" (2023) published in Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • "Is a higher frequency of esophageal dilations more effective in treating benign esophageal strictures? Retrospective, multicenter study" (2023) published in Endoscopy International Open

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Jutta Keller
  • Ulrich Rosien
  • Viola Andresen
  • Martin Rössle
  • Wolfgang Fischbach

Christian Ell has published multiple articles in the following venues, indicating consistent contributions in those journals:

  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Endoscopy International Open
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Carcinogenesis
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

The scientist's body of work comprises 38 publications primarily classified under Medicine, with notable contributions in Surgery (18 publications), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (5 publications), Epidemiology (5 publications), Molecular Biology (3 publications), and Gastroenterology (2 publications).

Best Publications

  • The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.

    C Ell;S Remke;A May;L Helou

  • Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus

    Oliver Pech;Angelika Behrens;Andrea Dinah May;Lars Nachbar

  • Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

    Christian Ell;Andrea May;Liebwin Gossner;Oliver Pech

  • Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett's cancer).

    Christian Ell;Andrea May;Oliver Pech;Liebwin Gossner

  • Endoscopic Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Study of 1000 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up

    T. Rösch;S. Daniel;M. Scholz;K. Huibregtse

  • Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease

    Andrea May;Lars Nachbar;Christian Ell

  • Photodynamic ablation of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus by means of 5-aminolevulinic acid

    Liebwin Gossner;Manfred Stolte;Ronald Sroka;Kai Rick

  • Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

    Oliver Pech;Andrea May;Hendrik Manner;Angelika Behrens

  • Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial.

    Jean-Paul Galmiche;Jan Hatlebakk;Stephen Attwood;Christian Ell

  • Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach.

    Andrea May;Liebwin Gossner;Oliver Pech;Andreas Fritz

  • Consensus Statements for Management of Barrett's Dysplasia and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Based on a Delphi Process

    Cathy Bennett;Nimish Vakil;Jacques Bergman;Rebecca Harrison

  • The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impact

    Simona Di Caro;Andrea May;Dimitri G.N. Heine;Lucia Fini

  • Double-balloon enteroscopy: preliminary experience in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic abdominal pain.

    A. May;L. Nachbar;A. Wardak;H. Yamamoto

  • ESOPEC: prospective randomized controlled multicenter phase III trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT protocol) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS protocol) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (NCT02509286)

    Jens Hoeppner;Florian Lordick;Thomas Brunner;Torben Glatz

  • Accuracy of staging in early oesophageal cancer using high resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial

    A May;E Günter;F Roth;L Gossner

  • Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double balloon enteroscopy: feasibility and limitations.

    Andrea May;Lars Nachbar;Jürgen Pohl;Christian Ell

  • Randomized Trial of Low-Volume PEG Solution Versus Standard PEG + Electrolytes for Bowel Cleansing Before Colonoscopy

    Christian Ell;Wolfgang Fischbach;Hans-Joachim Bronisch;Stefan Dertinger

  • Comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus at two high-volume centers.

    Oliver Pech;Elfriede Bollschweiler;Hendrik Manner;Jessica Leers

  • Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study.

    C. Ell;A. May;L. Nachbar;C. Cellier

  • Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer)

    O. Pech;L. Gossner;A. May;J. Huijsmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Stolte
Manfred Stolte Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Vieth
Michael Vieth University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Eckhart G. Hahn
Eckhart G. Hahn University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Jakob R. Izbicki
Jakob R. Izbicki Universität Hamburg
Markus M. Nöthen
Markus M. Nöthen University Hospital Bonn
Michael Knapp
Michael Knapp University of Bonn
Thomas L. Vaughan
Thomas L. Vaughan University of Washington
Jacques J. Bergman
Jacques J. Bergman University of Amsterdam
Johannes Schumacher
Johannes Schumacher Philipp University of Marburg
Jesper Lagergren
Jesper Lagergren King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA doesn’t always mean choosing the traditional MD route. Many students are opting for flexible online nursing degrees to enter or advance in healthcare. For registered nurses, rn to bsn programs without clinicals provide a convenient option to earn a bachelor’s degree without extensive on-site training, making this pathway ideal for working professionals.

If you’re aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles, pursuing a doctoral degree is a common next step. The fastest dnp online program can help you complete your Doctor of Nursing Practice in a shorter time frame, while those looking for manageable coursework might consider enrolling in the easiest dnp program online. Both options offer flexibility for those balancing education with work or family commitments.

For students who want to quickly enter the healthcare workforce, becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse is a popular choice. Learn about what is the fastest way to become an lpn through accredited online programs that expedite the path toward clinical practice. No matter your goal, online healthcare degrees are creating new, accessible pathways for medical careers in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Christian Ell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles