World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
48240
World Ranking
4555
National Ranking
246

Michael Vieth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Vieth sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 830 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Vieth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Vieth sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Vieth is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work extensively covers subfields such as Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Microscopic Colitis
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Michael Vieth has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed publications, frequently collaborating with several co-authors throughout their career. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Corinna Lang-Schwarz (31 joint publications)
  • William Sterlacci (21 joint publications)
  • Raf Bisschops (19 joint publications)
  • Markus Gerhard (19 joint publications)
  • Carlos A. Rubio (19 joint publications)

The scientist's work appears in a variety of publication venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Gastroenterology (20 publications)
  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie (11 publications)
  • Endoscopy (9 publications)
  • Gut (9 publications)
  • Journal of Crohn's and Colitis (9 publications)

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Michael Vieth include:

  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022, 2022, Endoscopy
  • Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, 2022, Endoscopy
  • Budesonide Orodispersible Tablets Maintain Remission in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis, 2020, Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review, 2023, Endoscopy
  • Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, 2021, Endoscopy

Best Publications

  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

    Pedro Pimentel-Nunes;Mário Dinis-Ribeiro;Thierry Ponchon;Alessandro Repici

  • The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria.

    Prateek Sharma;John Dent;David Armstrong;Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman

  • Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo

    Ralf Kiesslich;Juergen Burg;Michael Vieth;Janina Gnaendiger

  • Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study.

    Jukka Ronkainen;Pertti Aro;Tom Storskrubb;Sven–Erik Johansson

  • Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus

    Oliver Pech;Angelika Behrens;Andrea Dinah May;Lars Nachbar

  • Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

    Christian Ell;Andrea May;Liebwin Gossner;Oliver Pech

  • Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.

    Alessandro Lugli;Richard Kirsch;Yoichi Ajioka;Fred Bosman

  • European consensus on the histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease.

    F. Magro;C. Langner;A. Driessen;A. Ensari

  • Chromoscopy-Guided Endomicroscopy Increases the Diagnostic Yield of Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Ulcerative Colitis

    Ralf Kiesslich;Martin Goetz;Katharina Lammersdorf;Constantin Schneider

  • Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett's cancer).

    Christian Ell;Andrea May;Oliver Pech;Liebwin Gossner

  • Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

    Shin ei Kudo;René Lambert;John I. Allen;Hiroaki Fujii

  • In vivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy.

    Ralf Kiesslich;Liebwin Gossner;Martin Goetz;Alexandra Dahlmann

  • High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and esophagitis with or without symptoms in the general adult Swedish population: a Kalixanda study report.

    Jukka Ronkainen;Pertti Aro;Tom Storskrubb;Sven-Erik Johansson

  • OLGA staging for gastritis: a tutorial

    M Rugge;P Correa;F Di Mario;Emad Munir El-Omar

  • European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis : Overview and introduction to the full Supplement publication.

    L. Von Karsa;J. Patnick;J. Patnick;N. Segnan;W. Atkin

  • Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

    Oliver Pech;Andrea May;Hendrik Manner;Angelika Behrens

  • TH9 cells that express the transcription factor PU.1 drive T cell-mediated colitis via IL-9 receptor signaling in intestinal epithelial cells

    Katharina Gerlach;YouYi Hwang;Alexej Nikolaev;Raja Atreya

  • Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach.

    Andrea May;Liebwin Gossner;Oliver Pech;Andreas Fritz

  • Consensus Statements for Management of Barrett's Dysplasia and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Based on a Delphi Process

    Cathy Bennett;Nimish Vakil;Jacques Bergman;Rebecca Harrison

  • Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer)

    O. Pech;L. Gossner;A. May;J. Huijsmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus F. Neurath
Markus F. Neurath University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Manfred Stolte
Manfred Stolte Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter Malfertheiner
Peter Malfertheiner Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Christian Ell
Christian Ell Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Nicholas J. Talley
Nicholas J. Talley University of Newcastle Australia
Jan Tack
Jan Tack KU Leuven
Peter R. Galle
Peter R. Galle Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Markus Gerhard
Markus Gerhard Technical University of Munich
Arndt Hartmann
Arndt Hartmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Johannes Schumacher
Johannes Schumacher Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to many related healthcare fields and online degrees. If you’re seeking faster entry to healthcare roles, consider practical pathways like what is the easiest nursing program to get into. These programs can help you start your nursing journey with less competitive admission requirements.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, check out options for a health care administration degree. These degrees are available online and can lead to essential leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

If you want to work in healthcare without direct patient contact, consider enrolling in online medical coding classes with financial aid. This field is rapidly growing and offers flexibility, especially for those looking for remote opportunities.

Finally, some aspiring nurses might prefer programs that skip certain standardized admission tests. You can now find a nursing school without teas test, making the pathway to a nursing degree even more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Vieth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles