World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 46 5138 4946 41 39 155 8554

Henrik Leion publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henrik Leion between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henrik Leion published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 13 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
2003 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henrik Leion: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 2
2008 6
2009 8
2010 2
2011 11
2012 12
2013 16
2014 19
2015 6
2016 11
2017 5
2018 5
2019 6
2020 9
2021 11
2022 7
2023 19
2024 7
2025 6
Total 170
Download as CSV

Henrik Leion publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik Leion sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457 155
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Henrik Leion D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik Leion sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301 46
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Henrik Leion is affiliated with Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on chemical looping and thermochemical processes, with a strong emphasis on engineering applications within related subfields.

The main areas of research for Henrik Leion encompass the following topics:

  • Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
  • Coal and Its By-products
  • Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Iron and Steelmaking Processes
  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues

Their work spans across several related subfields of engineering:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Henrik Leion has contributed to academic knowledge through numerous publications across different scientific journals. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Energy & Fuels
  • Fuel Processing Technology
  • Fuel
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • ACS Omega

Their recent notable papers illustrate a continuing interest in oxygen carrier materials and biomass combustion processes, including:

  • Steel converter slag as an oxygen carrier for chemical-looping gasification, 2020, Fuel Processing Technology
  • Potassium Ash Interactions with Oxygen Carriers Steel Converter Slag and Iron Mill Scale in Chemical-Looping Combustion of Biomass-Experimental Evaluation Using Model Compounds, 2020, Energy & Fuels
  • Understanding the Interaction of Potassium Salts with an Ilmenite Oxygen Carrier Under Dry and Wet Conditions, 2020, ACS Omega
  • Release of P from Pyrolysis, Combustion, and Gasification of Biomass-A Model Compound Study, 2021, Energy & Fuels
  • Interaction of Iron Oxygen Carriers and Alkaline Salts Present in Biomass-Derived Ash, 2020, Energy & Fuels

Henrik Leion regularly collaborates with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Tobias Mattisson
  • Fredrik Hildor
  • Duygu Yılmaz
  • Victor Purnomo
  • Amir H. Soleimanisalim

The researcher has published over 100 papers in engineering disciplines, reflecting extensive involvement in topics related to chemical looping and thermochemical processes. This body of work indicates a focused research trajectory on advancing understanding and application of oxygen carriers, biomass conversion, and emission control technologies within engineering contexts.

Best Publications

  • Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels

    Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt;Henrik Leion

  • The use of ilmenite as an oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion

    Henrik Leion;Anders Lyngfelt;Marcus Johansson;Erik Jerndal

  • Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion

    Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • The use of petroleum coke as fuel in chemical-looping combustion

    Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Combined oxides as oxygen-carrier material for chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling

    Magnus Rydén;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling using CuO/ZrO2 with petroleum coke

    Tobias Mattisson;Henrik Leion;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Use of Ores and Industrial Products As Oxygen Carriers in Chemical-Looping Combustion

    Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Chemical-looping technologies using circulating fluidized bed systems: Status of development

    Tobias Mattisson;Martin Keller;Carl Johan Linderholm;Patrick Moldenhauer

  • Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion using oxide scale and unprocessed iron ore as oxygen carriers

    Henrik Leion;Erik Jerndal;Britt-Marie Steenari;Simon Hermansson

  • Use of CaMn0.875Ti0.125O3 as Oxygen Carrier in Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling

    Henrik Leion;Yngve Larring;Egil Bakken;Rune Bredesen

  • Using chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) for combustion of six different solid fuels

    Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Investigation of different manganese ores as oxygen carriers in chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for solid fuels

    Mehdi Arjmand;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Investigation of Different Mn–Fe Oxides as Oxygen Carrier for Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU)

    Golnar Azimi;Henrik Leion;Magnus Rydén;Tobias Mattisson

  • Prospects of Al2O3 and MgAl2O4-Supported CuO Oxygen Carriers in Chemical-Looping Combustion (CLC) and Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU)

    Mehdi Arjmand;Abdul-Majeed Azad;Abdul-Majeed Azad;Henrik Leion;Anders Lyngfelt

  • On the evaluation of synthetic and natural ilmenite using syngas as fuel in chemical-looping combustion (CLC)

    Muhammad Mufti Azis;Erik Jerndal;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson

  • Comparison of natural ilmenites as oxygen carriers in chemical-looping combustion and influence of water gas shift reaction on gas composition

    Georg L. Schwebel;Henrik Leion;Wolfgang Krumm

  • Gasification inhibition in chemical-looping combustion with solid fuels

    Martin Keller;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling using combined Mn-Fe oxides, testing in batch fluidized bed

    Golnar Azimi;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson;Anders Lyngfelt

  • Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion using a NiO-based oxygen carrier

    Henrik Leion;Anders Lyngfelt;Tobias Mattisson

  • Evaluation of CuAl2O4 as an Oxygen Carrier in Chemical-Looping Combustion

    Mehdi Arjmand;Abdul-Majeed Azad;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson

  • (MnzFe1—z)yOx combined oxides as oxygen carrier for chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling

    Golnar Azimi;Magnus Rydén;Henrik Leion;Tobias Mattisson

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Mattisson
Tobias Mattisson Chalmers University of Technology
Anders Lyngfelt
Anders Lyngfelt Chalmers University of Technology
Magnus Rydén
Magnus Rydén Chalmers University of Technology
Ningsheng Cai
Ningsheng Cai Tsinghua University
Marc Linder
Marc Linder University of Iowa
Leena Hupa
Leena Hupa Åbo Akademi University
Henrik Thunman
Henrik Thunman Chalmers University of Technology
Lunbo Duan
Lunbo Duan Southeast University
Hong Yong Sohn
Hong Yong Sohn University of Utah
Edward J. Anthony
Edward J. Anthony Cranfield University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology opens the door to a wide array of career pathways, many of which intersect with additional fields of study. Online education provides flexible options for expanding your qualifications, whether you're seeking advanced roles or pivoting within related industries.

For those interested in the business side of engineering projects, obtaining the cheapest online mba no gmat can strengthen your leadership and management skills efficiently and affordably. If leading complex projects is your goal, a cheap project management degree online can give you the credentials to oversee engineering teams and deliver major assignments on time.

Engineering principles are highly valued in fields like real estate and user experience design as well. If you are drawn to property development, urban planning, or facility management, pursuing an online degree real estate offers new career options. Meanwhile, as more technology is built around users, an online ux design degree can empower engineers and technologists to create more impactful digital products.

Best Scientists Citing Henrik Leion

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles