World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6547
World Ranking
8523
National Ranking
628

Donna M. Lloyd publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna M. Lloyd sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Donna M. Lloyd D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna M. Lloyd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donna M. Lloyd is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research spans fields related to Medicine and Neuroscience, with particular focus on subfields such as Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Genetics.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics, including:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Donna M. Lloyd has contributed to several publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Pain
  • Autism
  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Donna M. Lloyd include:

  • Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effective for the Treatment of Pain in Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Journal of Pain
  • Calm with horses? A systematic review of animal-assisted interventions for improving social functioning in children with autism, 2022, Autism
  • Improving artificial nutrition support for intensive care patients in a district general hospital - how well have we done?, 2020, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Frequent collaborators of Donna M. Lloyd include:

  • Priscilla Geraldine Wittkopf
  • Laura J. Arendsen
  • Anthony Jones
  • Jon H Sissons
  • Elise Blakemore

Best Publications

  • Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue?

    India Morrison;Donna Lloyd;Giuseppe Di Pellegrino;Neil Roberts

  • Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery

    K. MacIver;D. M. Lloyd;S. Kelly;N. Roberts

  • Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand.

    Donna M. Lloyd

  • Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception.

    Steve Guest;Caroline Catmur;Donna Lloyd;Charles Spence

  • Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex.

    Donna M. Lloyd;David I. Shore;Charles Spence;Gemma A. Calvert

  • In touch with the future: The sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality

    Donna Lloyd

  • Effect of background noise on food perception

    Andrew T. Woods;E Poliakoff;Donna Lloyd;J Kuenzel

  • Placebo conditioning and placebo analgesia modulate a common brain network during pain anticipation and perception

    Alison Watson;Wael El-Deredy;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Donna Lloyd

  • Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting.

    Steven P. Tipper;Donna Lloyd;Belinda Shorland;Christopher Dancer

  • Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.

    Charles Spence;Donna Lloyd;Francis McGlone;Mike E.R. Nicholls

  • Brief body-scan meditation practice improves somatosensory perceptual decision making

    Laura Mirams;Ellen Poliakoff;Richard J. Brown;Donna M. Lloyd

  • Role for Human Posterior Parietal Cortex in Visual Processing of Aversive Objects in Peripersonal Space

    Donna Lloyd;India Morrison;Neil Roberts

  • The space between us: a neurophilosophical framework for the investigation of human interpersonal space.

    Donna M. Lloyd

  • Differences in low back pain behavior are reflected in the cerebral response to tactile stimulation of the lower back

    Donna Lloyd;Gordon Findlay;Neil Roberts;Turo Nurmikko

  • Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly

    Steven P. Tipper;Nicola Phillips;Chris Dancer;Donna Lloyd

  • Counter-stimulatory effects on pain perception and processing are significantly altered by attention: an fMRI study.

    S. E. Longe;Richard Geoffrey Wise;S. Bantick;D. Lloyd

  • The physiology and psychology of selective attention to touch.

    Heidi Johansen-Berg;Donna M Lloyd

  • Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effective for the Treatment of Pain in Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Donna M Lloyd;Priscilla G Wittkopf;Laura J Arendsen;Anthony K P Jones

  • Embodied experience: A first-person investigation of the rubber hand illusion

    Elizabeth Lewis;Donna M. Lloyd

  • Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex.

    Andrew T. Woods;Donna M. Lloyd;Johanna Kuenzel;Ellen Poliakoff

  • Tactile spatial acuity varies with site and axis in the human upper limb.

    Frederick W.J. Cody;Rebecca A.D. Garside;Donna Lloyd;Ellen Poliakoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen Poliakoff
Ellen Poliakoff University of Manchester
Judith Holler
Judith Holler Max Planck Society
Francis McGlone
Francis McGlone Liverpool John Moores University
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Richard J. Brown
Richard J. Brown University of Manchester
Neil Roberts
Neil Roberts University of Edinburgh
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Wael El-Deredy
Wael El-Deredy Valparaiso University
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Donna M. Lloyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles