World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 34 6900 6407 1097 1019 219 5811

Mark Exworthy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Exworthy between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Exworthy published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2014. 18 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2014. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 47 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
1993 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Exworthy: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 6
1999 2
2000 3
2001 9
2002 5
2003 7
2004 3
2005 4
2006 4
2007 1
2008 6
2009 4
2010 4
2011 14
2012 6
2013 7
2014 47
2015 40
2016 7
2017 7
2018 4
2019 3
2020 5
2021 8
2022 6
2023 19
2024 11
2025 7
Total 256
Download as CSV

Mark Exworthy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Exworthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 219 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 219
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Exworthy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Exworthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181 34
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Exworthy is a researcher affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on the field of Health Professions, with a particular emphasis on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Health Information Management, Education, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research covers various topics within healthcare, including Healthcare Policy and Management, Healthcare Quality and Management, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Healthcare Innovation and Challenges, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, as well as Healthcare Systems and Challenges.

Selected recent papers authored by or involving Mark Exworthy include:

  • Wearing the Future-Wearables to Empower Users to Take Greater Responsibility for Their Health and Care: Scoping Review (2022), published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • On the character of the new entrepreneurial National Health Service in England: Reforming health care from within? (2021), published in Public Administration
  • The contribution of political skill to the implementation of health services change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis (2021), published in BMC Health Services Research
  • The power of autonomy and resilience in healthcare delivery (2023), published in BMJ
  • Understanding the Political Skills and Behaviours for Leading the Implementation of Health Services Change: A Qualitative Interview Study (2022), published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Mark Exworthy include:

  • Russell Mannion
  • Martin Powell
  • Justin Waring
  • Jenelle Clarke
  • Simon Bishop

Mark Exworthy has contributed to literature published in a range of venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Das Gesundheitswesen
  • Public Money & Management
  • BMJ Leader
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • BMJ

Their book publications include a title released by Bristol University Press eBooks:

  • The NHS at 75 (2023)

Best Publications

  • Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector

    Mark Exworthy;Susan Halford

  • Medical Tourism: treatments, markets and health system implications: a scoping review

    N Lunt;R Smith;Mark Exworthy;ST Green

  • Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process

    Mark Exworthy

  • Big Windows and Little Windows: Implementation in the ‘Congested State’

    Mark Exworthy;Martin Powell

  • Markets, bureaucracy and public management: the NHS: quasi-market, quasi-hierarchy and quasi-network?

    J. Mohan;M. Exworthy;Martin Powell

  • 'How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally' : the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities

    Mark Exworthy;Lee Berney;Martin Powell

  • Access, Choice and Travel: Implications for Health Policy

    Mark Exworthy;Stephen Peckham

  • Tackling health inequalities in the United Kingdom: the progress and pitfalls of policy.

    Mark Exworthy;David Blane;Michael Marmot

  • Policy entrepreneurship in the development of public sector strategy: the case of London health reform.

    Eivor Oborn;Michael Barrett;Mark Exworthy

  • The role of performance indicators in changing the autonomy of the general practice profession in the UK

    M Exworthy;E.K Wilkinson;A McColl;M Moore

  • A Framework for Exploring the Policy Implications of UK Medical Tourism and International Patient Flows

    Neil T. Lunt;Russell Mannion;Mark Exworthy

  • Professionals as managers across the public sector

    G. Causer;Mark Exworthy

  • Implications for the NHS of inward and outward medical tourism: a policy and economic analysis using literature review and mixed-methods approaches

    Neil Lunt;Richard D Smith;Russell Mannion;Stephen T Green

  • Health and the Economy

    M. Exworthy;R. Robinson;D. Evans

  • Evidence into Policy and Practice? Measuring the Progress of U.S. and U.K. Policies to Tackle Disparities and Inequalities in U.S. and U.K. Health and Health Care

    Mark Exworthy;Andrew Bindman;Huw Davies;A. Eugene Washington

  • The Challenge of Joined-Up Government in Tackling Health Inequalities

    Mark Exworthy;David J. Hunter

  • Networks in health care : a comparative study of their management, impact & performance

    E. Ferlie;L. Fitzgerald;S. Dopson;G. McGivern

  • Room for manoeuvre? Explaining local autonomy in the English National Health Service.

    Mark Exworthy;Francesca Frosini

  • Tackling health inequalities since the Acheson Inquiry

    M. Exworthy;M. Stuart;D. Blane;M. Marmot

  • (Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.

    Russell Mannion;Mark Exworthy

  • DECENTRALIZING HEALTH SERVICES IN THE UK: A NEW CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

    Stephen Peckham;Mark Exworthy;Martin Powell;Ian Greener

  • Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study

    Emma K Wilkinson;Alastair McColl;Mark Exworthy;Paul Roderick

  • Clinical governance in primary care groups: the feasibility of deriving evidence-based performance indicators

    Alastair McColl;Paul Roderick;Helen Smith;Emma Wilkinson

  • Geographies of Care: Space, Place and the Voluntary Sector

    Mark Exworthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Mannion
Russell Mannion University of Birmingham
Richard D. Smith
Richard D. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Martin Powell
Martin Powell University of Birmingham
John Øvretveit
John Øvretveit Karolinska Institute
Ian Greener
Ian Greener University of Strathclyde
Jonathan Gabe
Jonathan Gabe Royal Holloway University of London
David Blane
David Blane University College London
Pauline Allen
Pauline Allen University of London
Richard Smith
Richard Smith University of Exeter
Michael Marmot
Michael Marmot University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Social Sciences and Humanities education in the USA now includes a variety of flexible online degrees catering to diverse career goals. Many students are seeking programs that balance academic rigor with real-world skills, leading to rewarding employment in fields like social work, psychology, counseling, and family therapy.

For those interested in working with communities, one year msw programs provide a fast-track route to a Master of Social Work, preparing graduates for leadership roles in social services in just 12 months. Psychology enthusiasts can consider a fast track psychology degree online to quickly gain foundational knowledge applicable in mental health, research, or education sectors.

Those aiming to become licensed counselors should explore cacrep online masters in counseling, which ensure graduates meet industry accreditation standards. Students interested in helping couples and families can pursue marriage and family therapy certification online, opening doors to specialized therapy practices.

These flexible online programs help students advance their careers while meeting personal and professional commitments, making higher education in the Social Sciences and Humanities more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Exworthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles