World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen

Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
6804
World Ranking
6434
National Ranking
249

Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 70 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the domains of medicine and health professions, with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health. Wolfhagen's scholarly work explores innovations in medical education, interprofessional education and collaboration, and healthcare quality and management.

Wolfhagen's recent publications encompass studies on educational quality, team learning, and continuous quality improvement in medical education. Notable papers include:

  • Mind the gap: Teachers' conceptions of student-staff partnership and its potential to enhance educational quality, 2020, Medical Teacher
  • Shaping a Culture for Continuous Quality Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education, 2020, Academic Medicine
  • Advancing quality culture in health professions education: experiences and perspectives of educational leaders, 2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • Enhancing Team Learning through Leader Inclusiveness: A One-Year Ethnographic Case Study of an Interdisciplinary Teacher Team, 2021, Teaching and Learning in Medicine
  • When I say... team learning, 2020, Medical Education

Frequent collaborators in Wolfhagen's research include Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink, Diana Dolmans, Stephanie N. E. Meeuwissen, Wim Gijselaers, and Guy Bendermacher. The research outputs have been published in venues such as Medical Teacher, Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, and Medical Education.

Their research interests extend to several subfields including general health professions, education, health information management, and information systems and management. Wolfhagen's work covers key topics such as:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Biomedical and Engineering Education

Best Publications

  • Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research.

    Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Willem D. E. Grave;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Cees P. M. Van Der Vleuten

  • The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education

    Dineke E.H. Tigelaar;Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Ineke H.A.P. Wolfhagen;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten

  • Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research.

    Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Wim H. Gijselaers;Jos H.C. Moust;Willem S. de Grave

  • Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: hold on to the philosophy

    Diana H J M Dolmans;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen;Cees P M van der Vleuten;Wynand H F W Wijnen

  • Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review

    G. W. G. Bendermacher;M. G. A. Oude Egbrink;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans

  • Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students?

    Renée E. Stalmeijer;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier

  • The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers.

    Renée E. Stalmeijer;Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Arno M. M. Muijtjens

  • Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study.

    Astrid J S F Visschers‐Pleijers;Diana H J M Dolmans;Bas A de Leng;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen

  • Motivational and cognitive processes influencing tutorial groups.

    Dolmans Dh;Wolfhagen Ih;van der Vleuten Cp

  • Clinical teaching based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship: views of experienced clinical teachers.

    Renée E. Stalmeijer;Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Hetty A.M. Snellen-Balendong;Marijke van Santen-Hoeufft

  • The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: involving stakeholders to determine content validity.

    Renée E Stalmeijer;Diana H J M Dolmans;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen;Arno M M Muijtjens

  • The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations.

    Diana H J M Dolmans;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen;Gerard G M Essed;Albert J J A Scherpbier

  • Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning

    Astrid J.S.F. Visschers-Pleijers;Diana H.J.M. Dolmans;Ineke H.A.P. Wolfhagen;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten

  • A rating scale for tutor evaluation in a problem-based curriculum: validity and reliability.

    D. H. J. M. Dolmans;I. H. A. P. Wolfhagen;H. G. Schmidt;C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten

  • Validation of a short questionnaire to assess the degree of complexity and structuredness of PBL problems.

    Alexandra E J P Jacobs;Diana H J M Dolmans;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen;Albert J J A Scherpbier

  • Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers

    Renée E. Stalmeijer;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Wim G. Peters

  • Factors Adversely Affecting Student Learning in the Clinical Learning Environment: A Student Perspective

    Diana Hjm Dolmans;Ineke Hap Wolfhagen;Erik Heineman;Albert Jja Scherpbier

  • Quality issues in judging portfolios: implications for organizing teaching portfolio assessment procedures

    Dineke E. H. Tigelaar;Diana H. J. M. Dolmans;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen;Cees P. M. van der Vleuten

  • The impact of student-generated learning issues on individual study time and academic achievement.

    Marianne M Van Den Hurk;Ineke H A P Wolfhagen;Diana H J M Dolmans;Cees P M Van Der Vleuten

  • Does blended problem-based learning make Asian medical students active learners?: a prospective comparative study.

    Ikuo Shimizu;Hideyuki Nakazawa;Yoshihiko Sato;Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen

  • Ready or not? Expectations of faculty and medical students for clinical skills preparation for clerkships.

    Marjorie D. Wenrich;Molly B. Jackson;Albert J. Scherpbier;Ineke H. Wolfhagen

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans
Diana H. J. M. Dolmans Maastricht University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Wim H. Gijselaers
Wim H. Gijselaers Maastricht University
Arno M. M. Muijtjens
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Maastricht University
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Jacobs
Jan Jacobs KU Leuven
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Paul Ginns
Paul Ginns University of Sydney
Tim Mainhard
Tim Mainhard Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a range of flexible, online degree options. Today’s students can fast-track their education with accelerated psyd programs, which are designed for future psychologists seeking to quickly begin their clinical careers. Similarly, accelerated online mft programs help those aiming for a career in marriage and family therapy enter the workforce sooner.

For students focused on affordability, a variety of psychology masters programs offer cost-effective paths to specialized skills and further study. Educators and administrators can opt for accelerated edd programs, allowing them to swiftly advance in leadership roles.

When considering these pathways, it is important to review each program for accreditation, curriculum quality, and whether the format fits your personal and professional needs. Online programs provide flexibility and a pathway to meaningful careers in social sciences, humanities, education, and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles