World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Korea
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4326 3995 9 9 173 10556

Kyooseob Ha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kyooseob Ha between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kyooseob Ha published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2012. 10 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2012. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kyooseob Ha: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 6
2003 2
2004 4
2005 6
2006 3
2007 5
2008 9
2009 14
2010 4
2011 10
2012 21
2013 12
2014 13
2015 18
2016 8
2017 7
2018 7
2019 3
2020 4
2021 11
2022 5
2023 7
2024 8
2025 2
Total 194
Download as CSV

Kyooseob Ha publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyooseob Ha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 173
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kyooseob Ha D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyooseob Ha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Korea Leader Award

Overview

Kyooseob Ha is affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea. Their research encompasses a range of topics within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant focus on psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Key subfields addressed in their work are:

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Genetics
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pharmacology

Kyooseob Ha has investigated several central topics, including:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Their recent papers reflect these themes, featuring research on bipolar disorder, genetic predictions, and psychiatric disorders, such as:

  • Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology (2021, Nature Genetics)
  • Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Genome-wide association study of over 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology (2020, bioRxiv - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Comparison of serum protein profiles between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder (2020, BMC Psychiatry)
  • An integrated model for the relationship between socio-cultural factors, Attitudes Toward Suicide, and intensity of suicidal ideation in Korean, Japanese, and American populations (2020, Journal of Affective Disorders)

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Nature Genetics
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Kyooseob Ha regularly collaborates with several coauthors, such as:

  • Yong Min Ahn
  • Sang Jin Rhee
  • Se Hyun Kim
  • Jun Soo Kwon
  • Ji Hyun Baek

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology

    Niamh Mullins;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Kevin S. O'Connell;Kevin S. O'Connell;Brandon Coombes

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2013.

    Lakshmi N. Yatham;Sidney H. Kennedy;Sagar V. Parikh;Ayal Schaffer

  • The International Society for bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders

    Isabella Pacchiarotti;David J. Bond;Ross J. Baldessarini;Willem A. Nolen

  • Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2009.

    Lakshmi N Yatham;Sidney H Kennedy;Ayal Schaffer;Sagar V Parikh

  • International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide: meta-analyses and meta-regression of correlates of suicide attempts and suicide deaths in bipolar disorder.

    Ayal Schaffer;Erkki T. Isometsä;Leonardo Tondo;Doris H Moreno

  • Grey matter differences in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies

    Sudhakar Selvaraj;Danilo Arnone;Dominic Job;Andrew Stanfield

  • Ubiquitous healthcare service using Zigbee and mobile phone for elderly patients

    Hak Jong Lee;Sun Hee Lee;Kyoo Seob Ha;Hak Chul Jang

  • Staging systems in bipolar disorder: an International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force Report.

    F. Kapczinski;P. V. S. Magalhães;V. Balanzá-Martinez;V. V. Dias

  • Bipolar mixed states: An international society for bipolar disorders task force report of symptom structure, course of illness, and diagnosis.

    Alan C. Swann;Beny Lafer;Giulio Perugi;Mark A. Frye

  • The association between problematic internet use and depression, suicidal ideation and bipolar disorder symptoms in Korean adolescents

    Unknown

  • Epidemiology, neurobiology and pharmacological interventions related to suicide deaths and suicide attempts in bipolar disorder: Part I of a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide in Bipolar Disorder.

    Ayal Schaffer;Erkki T Isometsä;Leonardo Tondo;Doris H Moreno

  • Predominant recurrence polarity among 928 adult international bipolar I disorder patients

    R. J. Baldessarini;J. Undurraga;J. Undurraga;G. H. Vázquez;L. Tondo

  • Differences between bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in clinical features, comorbidity, and family history

    Ji Hyun Baek;Dong Yeon Park;Jungmi Choi;Ji Sun Kim

  • A review of factors associated with greater likelihood of suicide attempts and suicide deaths in bipolar disorder: Part II of a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force on Suicide in Bipolar Disorder

    Ayal Schaffer;Erkki T. Isometsä;Jean Michel Azorin;Frederick Cassidy

  • Gray matter abnormalities in paranoid schizophrenia and their clinical correlations

    Tae Hyon Ha;Tak Youn;Kyoo Seob Ha;Kyoo Seob Ha;Kyu Sik Rho

  • Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of olanzapine in patients with bipolar I depression

    Mauricio Tohen;David P. McDonnell;Michael Case;Shigenobu Kanba

  • Statistical parametric mapping of LORETA using high density EEG and individual MRI: Application to mismatch negativities in Schizophrenia

    Hae Jeong Park;Jun Soo Kwon;Tak Youn;Ji Soo Pae

  • Regional brain gray matter abnormalities in patients with bipolar II disorder: A comparison study with bipolar I patients and healthy controls

    Tae Hyon Ha;Kyooseob Ha;Kyooseob Ha;Jae Hyoung Kim;Jung Eun Choi

  • Fractal dimension of cerebral cortical surface in schizophrenia and obsessive–compulsive disorder

    Tae Hyon Ha;Uicheul Yoon;Kyung Jin Lee;Yong Wook Shin

  • Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire

    Duk-In Jon;Narei Hong;Bo-Hyun Yoon;Han Yong Jung

  • Gender ratio comparisons of the suicide rates and methods in Korea, Japan, Australia, and the United States

    Myung Hee Ahn;Subin Park;Kyooseob Ha;Soon Ho Choi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jun Soo Kwon
Jun Soo Kwon Seoul National University
Lakshmi N. Yatham
Lakshmi N. Yatham University of British Columbia
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Michael Berk
Michael Berk Deakin University
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Martin Alda
Martin Alda Dalhousie University
Mauricio Tohen
Mauricio Tohen University of New Mexico
Allan H. Young
Allan H. Young King's College London
Stefan Herms
Stefan Herms University of Basel
Per Hoffmann
Per Hoffmann University of Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career avenues. Today, online degree options make it faster and more affordable to access quality programs and enter the workforce sooner.

Prospective social workers can choose from msw accelerated programs to gain professional credentials and start making a difference in communities at a quicker pace. For those drawn to mental health and human behavior, an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology can lead to careers in counseling, market research, or human resources.

Counseling careers are in high demand, and studying at cacrep accredited universities ensures programs meet strict educational and ethical standards. Another sought-after pathway is marriage and family therapy; enrolling in a reputable mft degree program can open doors to private practice, clinics, and community agencies.

With online learning, you can tailor your studies around work or family, making career advancement in these meaningful fields more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Kyooseob Ha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles