World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
42480
World Ranking
16879
National Ranking
8463

Raymond J. Kim publications per year

1990: 1 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
1990 2025

353 publications in total across all disciplines

Raymond J. Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 330 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Raymond J. Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond J. Kim is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and specializes in Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their primary research areas include cardiac imaging and diagnostics, cardiovascular function and risk factors, and advanced MRI techniques and applications.

The scientist's work spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering. This multidisciplinary expertise underpins a broad approach to cardiovascular research and related diagnostic technologies.

Raymond J. Kim has contributed to multiple recent papers published in notable academic journals. Selected publications include:

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update (2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance)
  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update (2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance)
  • Patients With Acute Myocarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination (2021, JAMA Cardiology)
  • Relationship of LVEF and Myocardial Scar to Long-Term Mortality Risk and Mode of Death in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy (2021, Circulation)
  • Effects of Elamipretide on Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The PROGRESS-HF Phase 2 Trial (2020, Journal of Cardiac Failure)

Frequent coauthors with Raymond J. Kim include:

  • Michele Parker
  • Robert M. Judd
  • Han W. Kim
  • Dipan J. Shah
  • Yodying Kaolawanich

The scientist's publications appear mostly in leading cardiovascular and imaging journals, highlighting their research focus. These venues include:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation

Raymond J. Kim's main topics of work encompass:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Best Publications

  • The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.

    Raymond J. Kim;Edwin Wu;Allen Rafael;Enn Ling Chen

  • Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

    Raymond J. Kim;David S. Fieno;Todd B. Parrish;Kathleen Harris

  • ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging*

    Robert C. Hendel;Manesh R. Patel;Christopher M. Kramer;Michael Poon

  • Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D Flamm

  • An Improved MR Imaging Technique for the Visualization of Myocardial Infarction

    O. P. Simonetti;R. J. Kim;D. S. Fieno;H. B. Hillenbrand

  • Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study

    Anja Wagner;Anja Wagner;Heiko Mahrholdt;Heiko Mahrholdt;Thomas A Holly;Michael D Elliott

  • Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial

    Margaret M. Redfield;Horng H. Chen;Barry A. Borlaug;Marc J. Semigran

  • Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies

    Heiko Mahrholdt;Anja Wagner;Robert M. Judd;Udo Sechtem

  • Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.

    Edwin Wu;Robert M Judd;John D Vargas;Francis J Klocke

  • Myocardial Gd-DTPA Kinetics Determine MRI Contrast Enhancement and Reflect the Extent and Severity of Myocardial Injury After Acute Reperfused Infarction

    Raymond J. Kim;Enn-Ling Chen;Joa˜o A.C. Lima;Robert M. Judd

  • Transmural Extent of Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Long-Term Improvement in Contractile Function

    Kelly M. Choi;Raymond J. Kim;George Gubernikoff;John D. Vargas

  • SIRT6 regulates TNF-α secretion through hydrolysis of long-chain fatty acyl lysine

    Hong Jiang;Saba Khan;Yi Wang;Guillaume Charron

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update

    Christopher M. Kramer;Jörg Barkhausen;Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci;Scott D. Flamm

  • Myocardial scarring in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Lubna Choudhury;Heiko Mahrholdt;Anja Wagner;Kelly M. Choi

  • Detection of Myocardial Damage in Patients With Sarcoidosis

    Manesh R. Patel;Peter J. Cawley;John F. Heitner;Igor Klem

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update

    Christopher M Kramer;Jörg Barkhausen;Scott D Flamm;Raymond J Kim

  • Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk ☆: Distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing

    David S. Fieno;Raymond J. Kim;Enn Ling Chen;Jon W. Lomasney

  • Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols

    Christopher M Kramer;Jorg Barkhausen;Scott D Flamm;Raymond J Kim

  • Visualization of Discrete Microinfarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Associated With Mild Creatine Kinase-MB Elevation

    Mark J. Ricciardi;Edwin Wu;Charles J. Davidson;Kelly M. Choi

  • Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update

    Jeanette Schulz-Menger;David A. Bluemke;Jens Bremerich;Scott D. Flamm

Frequent Co-Authors

Manesh R. Patel
Manesh R. Patel Duke University
Robert O. Bonow
Robert O. Bonow Northwestern University
Christopher M. Kramer
Christopher M. Kramer University of Virginia Health System
Mihai Gheorghiade
Mihai Gheorghiade Northwestern University
Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University
Udo Sechtem
Udo Sechtem Robert Bosch (Germany)
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Javed Butler
Javed Butler University of Mississippi
Matthias G. Friedrich
Matthias G. Friedrich McGill University
Dudley J. Pennell
Dudley J. Pennell National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA can lead to many exciting opportunities beyond becoming a physician. For those interested in leadership roles within healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration online degree provides essential business, management, and policy skills needed in hospitals or clinics.

Registered nurses looking to advance their careers can benefit from accelerated nursing pathways like rn to np bridge programs, which help transition from an associate to a master's—and ultimately, a nurse practitioner role.

Nutrition and dietetics is another fast-growing field. With an online dietitian degree, students learn how to promote health and wellness through proper nutrition, opening doors to roles in hospitals, schools, or private practice.

For those focused on executive management, completing one of the online mha programs can lead to advanced administrative positions and give graduates a deeper understanding of healthcare systems.

Each of these online degree pathways offers flexibility and specialized knowledge, guiding students toward rewarding healthcare careers suited to their interests.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond J. Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles