World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7925
World Ranking
8161
National Ranking
806

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
7925
World Ranking
8024
National Ranking
600

Helen E. Moss publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen E. Moss sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Helen E. Moss D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen E. Moss sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helen E. Moss is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile focuses on research activities associated with this institution.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues recorded for Helen E. Moss. Similarly, no book publications or main fields and subfields of study have been documented.

Details about main topics of work, awards, and distinctions are also not available for Helen E. Moss.

The absence of this information restricts the ability to provide a detailed overview of research interests, contributions, and career trajectory beyond the institutional affiliation with the University of Cambridge.

Best Publications

  • Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge

    Lorraine K. Tyler;Helen E. Moss

  • Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task.

    Joseph T. Devlin;Richard P. Russell;Matt H. Davis;Cathy J. Price

  • Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming

    Helen E. Moss;Ruth K. Ostrin;Lorraine K. Tyler;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits

    L.K. Tyler;H.E. Moss;M.R. Durrant-Peatfield;J.P. Levy

  • Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences.

    Ana Raposo;Helen E. Moss;Emmanuel A. Stamatakis;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI

    Joseph T Devlin;Richard P Russell;Matthew H Davis;Cathy J Price

  • Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity

    L. K. Tyler;E. A. Stamatakis;P. Bright;K. Acres

  • The neural representation of nouns and verbs: PET studies.

    Lorraine K. Tyler;Richard Russell;Jalal Fadili;Helen E. Moss

  • Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex

    Kirsten I. Taylor;Helen E. Moss;Emmanuel A. Stamatakis;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Selecting Among Competing Alternatives: Selection and Retrieval in the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus

    H.E. Moss;S. Abdallah;P. Fletcher;P. Bright

  • Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access.

    W. MarslenWilson;H.E. Moss;S. van Halen

  • Unitary vs Multiple Semantics: PET Studies of Word and Picture Processing.

    P Bright;H Moss;L.K Tyler

  • Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia

    Uta Noppeney;Karalyn Patterson;Lorraine K. Tyler;Helen Moss

  • ‘Two Eyes of a See-through’: Impaired and Intact Semantic Knowledge in a Case of Selective Deficit for Living Things

    Helen E. Moss;Lorraine K. Tyler;Mark Durrant-peatfield;Elaine M. Bunn

  • Anteromedial Temporal Cortex Supports Fine-grained Differentiation among Objects

    H.E. Moss;J.M. Rodd;E.A. Stamatakis;P. Bright

  • Objects and their actions: evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system.

    Lorraine K. Tyler;Emmanuel A. Stamatakis;E. Dick;P. Bright

  • Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies.

    Billi Randall;Helen E. Moss;Jennifer M. Rodd;Mike Greer

  • A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non-living things.

    H.E Moss;L.K Tyler

  • The Time Course of Activation of Semantic Information during Spoken Word Recognition

    Helen E. Moss;Samantha F. McCormick;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • A Distributed Memory Model of the Associative Boost in Semantic Priming

    Helen E. Moss;M. L. Hare;P. Day;Lorraine K. Tyler

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorraine K. Tyler
Lorraine K. Tyler University of Cambridge
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis University of Sydney
Jennifer M. Rodd
Jennifer M. Rodd University College London
Kirsten I. Taylor
Kirsten I. Taylor Roche (Switzerland)
William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Joseph T. Devlin
Joseph T. Devlin University College London
Michael D. Kopelman
Michael D. Kopelman King's College London
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in neuroscience often means exploring various academic and career options. If you’re looking to maximize your earning potential, it’s helpful to know which degrees make the most money. Many STEM-related areas, including neuroscience and related fields, are among the highest-paying majors.

For those interested in flexible learning, online degrees can offer a cost-effective route. There are many cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa in usa, making higher education more affordable and accessible to a larger group of students.

If you’re looking for shorter commitments or skill-specific knowledge, numerous certificates online are available. Many of these certifications are designed to develop specialized skills and can lead directly to well-paying roles in healthcare, research, or tech industries.

Not all degree paths are equally demanding. Prospective students may want to browse the easiest online degree options to find programs that suit their strengths and learning styles while still relating to neuroscience or the broader sciences.

With careful research, it’s possible to align your educational choices in neuroscience with practical outcomes like affordability, flexibility, and lucrative career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Helen E. Moss

Recently Published Articles