World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
43
Citations
10897
World Ranking
511
National Ranking
14

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
14511
World Ranking
5410
National Ranking
360

Anika Lehmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anika Lehmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 86 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anika Lehmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anika Lehmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Anika Lehmann is a researcher affiliated with Freie Universität Berlin in Germany. Their work predominantly spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with significant contributions to the understanding of plant-soil interactions and ecosystem dynamics.

Lehmann's main research subfields include Plant Science, Pollution, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science, and Insect Science. Within these areas, their work increasingly focuses on topics such as Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Microplastics and Plastic Pollution, biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties, and Fungal Biology and Applications.

Their recent publications highlight a focus on ecosystem thresholds, soil biodiversity, and the impact of microplastics on terrestrial environments. Notable papers include:

  • "Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity," 2020, Science
  • "Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems," 2020, Science
  • "Microplastic Shape, Polymer Type, and Concentration Affect Soil Properties and Plant Biomass," 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • "Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity," 2021, Science
  • "Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands," 2022, Science

Lehmann frequently collaborates with several researchers in their field. The most frequent coauthors include Matthias C. Rillig, Eva F. Leifheit, Nico Eisenhauer, Bo Tang, and Carlos A. Guerra.

Their work has appeared in multiple publication venues, with the highest number of contributions in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), followed by Global Change Biology, Science, New Phytologist, and Soil Ecology Letters.

Lehmann's research contributes to several critical environmental challenges, including soil pollution, ecosystem resilience, and the role of fungi in plant health. The scope of their investigations spans molecular to ecosystem levels, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to environmental and agricultural sciences.

Best Publications

  • Impacts of Microplastics on the Soil Biophysical Environment

    Anderson Abel de Souza Machado;Anderson Abel de Souza Machado;Chung Wai Lau;Chung Wai Lau;Chung Wai Lau;Jennifer Till;Werner Kloas;Werner Kloas

  • Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity

    Miguel Berdugo;Miguel Berdugo;Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo;Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo;Santiago Soliveres;Rocío Hernández-Clemente

  • Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems

    Matthias C. Rillig;Anika Lehmann

  • The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity.

    Matthias C. Rillig;Masahiro Ryo;Anika Lehmann;Carlos A. Aguilar-Trigueros

  • Microplastic effects on plants.

    Matthias C Rillig;Anika Lehmann;A Abel de Souza Machado;Gaowen Yang

  • Microplastic Shape, Polymer Type, and Concentration Affect Soil Properties and Plant Biomass.

    Yudi M. Lozano;Timon Lehnert;Lydia T. Linck;Anika Lehmann

  • Nutrient limitation of soil microbial processes in tropical forests

    Tessa Camenzind;Stephan Hättenschwiler;Kathleen K. Treseder;Anika Lehmann

  • Plant root and mycorrhizal fungal traits for understanding soil aggregation.

    Matthias C. Rillig;Carlos A. Aguilar‐Trigueros;Joana Bergmann;Erik Verbruggen

  • Soil biota contributions to soil aggregation.

    Anika Lehmann;Weishuang Zheng;Matthias C. Rillig

  • Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation—a meta-analysis

    Eva F. Leifheit;Stavros D. Veresoglou;Anika Lehmann;E. Kathryn Morris;E. Kathryn Morris

  • Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands

    Unknown

  • Transport of microplastics by two collembolan species.

    Stefanie Maaß;Daniel Daphi;Anika Lehmann;Matthias C. Rillig

  • Soil aggregates as massively concurrent evolutionary incubators.

    Matthias C. Rillig;Ludo A. H. Muller;Anika Lehmann

  • Interchange of entire communities: microbial community coalescence.

    Matthias C. Rillig;Janis Antonovics;Tancredi Caruso;Anika Lehmann

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain yields: a meta-analysis.

    Shujuan Zhang;Anika Lehmann;Weishuang Zheng;Zhaoyang You

  • Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity.

    Carlos A. Guerra;Richard D. Bardgett;Lucrezia Caon;Thomas W. Crowther

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal contribution to copper, manganese and iron nutrient concentrations in crops – A meta-analysis

    Anika Lehmann;Matthias C. Rillig

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on zinc nutrition in crop plants – A meta-analysis

    Anika Lehmann;Stavros D. Veresoglou;Eva F. Leifheit;Matthias C. Rillig

  • Nitrogen increases soil organic carbon accrual and alters its functionality

    Unknown

  • Impacts of domestication on the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis of 27 crop species

    Nieves Martín-Robles;Anika Lehmann;Erica Seco;Ricardo Aroca

  • Evolutionary implications of microplastics for soil biota

    Matthias C Rillig;Anderson Abel de Souza Machado;Anika Lehmann;Uli Klümper

  • Abiotic and Biotic Factors Influencing the Effect of Microplastic on Soil Aggregation

    Anika Lehmann;Katharina Fitschen;Matthias C. Rillig

  • Towards an Integrated Mycorrhizal Technology: Harnessing Mycorrhiza for Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture.

    Matthias C. Rillig;Moisés A. Sosa-Hernández;Julien Roy;Carlos A. Aguilar-Trigueros

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig Freie Universität Berlin
Stavros D. Veresoglou
Stavros D. Veresoglou Freie Universität Berlin
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo Spanish National Research Council
Johannes Lehmann
Johannes Lehmann Cornell University
Jeff R. Powell
Jeff R. Powell Western Sydney University
Nico Eisenhauer
Nico Eisenhauer Leipzig University
Erik Verbruggen
Erik Verbruggen University of Antwerp
Janis Antonovics
Janis Antonovics University of Virginia
Santiago Soliveres
Santiago Soliveres University of Alicante
Pedro M. Antunes
Pedro M. Antunes Algoma University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences can open doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in the social aspects of environmental issues, a best online bachelor degree in sociology provides foundational knowledge of societal impacts and human behavior, essential for roles in community planning and environmental justice.

For professionals aiming to advance their credentials rapidly, some universities offer 1 year phd programs online no dissertation, which can streamline education without compromising depth. These accelerated options are ideal for those balancing work and study.

Educators or environmental trainers can benefit from exploring best eds to edd programs that help bridge the gap from education specialist degrees to doctorates. This pathway strengthens leadership skills and expertise in curriculum development focusing on sustainability and environmental education.

For social workers addressing environmental health and community wellbeing, dsw programs offer advanced practice doctorates that emphasize advocacy and policy development, crucial for environmental social work careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anika Lehmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles