World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 34 7645 7394 48 46 170 4285

Jan Šobotník publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Šobotník between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Šobotník published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 19 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications
2003 2025

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Šobotník: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 3
2008 11
2009 8
2010 9
2011 3
2012 11
2013 3
2014 6
2015 10
2016 6
2017 4
2018 8
2019 9
2020 9
2021 17
2022 14
2023 16
2024 9
2025 10
Total 176
Download as CSV

Jan Šobotník publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Šobotník sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–171 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 170 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174 170
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Šobotník D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Šobotník sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252 34
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Šobotník is affiliated with the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague in the Czech Republic. Their research spans various areas within agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular focus on insect ecology, behavior, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work has appeared frequently in a range of academic venues. Notably, these include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Systematic Entomology
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Arthropod Structure & Development

Šobotník's research primarily covers the following fields of study:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader domains, the main topics and subfields of their work include:

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Insect Science
  • Ecology
  • Plant Science

  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology

Their recent publications illustrate a focus on termite biology and related ecological systems. Selected papers include:

  • "The functional evolution of termite gut microbiota" (2022) published in Microbiome
  • "Termite evolution: mutualistic associations, key innovations, and the rise of Termitidae" (2021) published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
  • "Phylogenomic analysis of 589 metagenome-assembled genomes encompassing all major prokaryotic lineages from the gut of higher termites" (2020) published in PeerJ
  • "Caffeine - Perspective natural biocide for wood protection against decaying fungi and termites" (2021) published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Genomic data provide insights into the classification of extant termites" (2024) published in Nature Communications

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of Šobotník's career. Frequent coauthors include:

  • David Sillam-Dussès
  • Thomas Bourguignon
  • Simon Hellemans
  • Aleš Buček
  • Petr Stiblík

Best Publications

  • The Evolutionary History of Termites as Inferred from 66 Mitochondrial Genomes

    Thomas Bourguignon;Nathan Lo;Stephen L. Cameron;Jan Šobotník

  • Chemical warfare in termites

    Jan Šobotník;Anna Jirošová;Robert Hanus

  • Evolution of Termite Symbiosis Informed by Transcriptome-Based Phylogenies

    Ales Bucek;Ales Bucek;Jan Šobotník;Shulin He;Shulin He;Mang Shi

  • Mitochondrial phylogenomics resolves the global spread of higher termites, ecosystem engineers of the tropics

    Thomas Bourguignon;Thomas Bourguignon;Thomas Bourguignon;Nathan Lo;Jan Šobotník;Simon Y. W. Ho

  • Rampant Host Switching Shaped the Termite Gut Microbiome

    Thomas Bourguignon;Thomas Bourguignon;Thomas Bourguignon;Nathan Lo;Carsten Dietrich;Carsten Dietrich;Jan Šobotník

  • The functional evolution of termite gut microbiota

    Unknown

  • Explosive backpacks in old termite workers.

    Jan Šobotník;Thomas Bourguignon;Thomas Bourguignon;Robert Hanus;Robert Hanus;Zuzana Demianová

  • ( E,E )-α-Farnesene, an Alarm Pheromone of the Termite Prorhinotermes canalifrons

    Jan Šobotník;Jan Šobotník;Robert Hanus;Blanka Kalinová;Rafal Piskorski

  • Feeding ecology and phylogenetic structure of a complex neotropical termite assemblage, revealed by nitrogen stable isotope ratios

    Thomas Bourguignon;Jan Sobotnik;Gilles Lepoint;Jean Michel Martin

  • Termite evolution: mutualistic associations, key innovations, and the rise of Termitidae.

    Thomas Chouvenc;Jan Šobotník;Michael S. Engel;Thomas Bourguignon;Thomas Bourguignon

  • Analysis of Insect Cuticular Hydrocarbons Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry

    Josef Cvačka;Pavel Jiroš;Jan Šobotník;Robert Hanus

  • Oceanic dispersal, vicariance and human introduction shaped the modern distribution of the termites Reticulitermes, Heterotermes and Coptotermes.

    Thomas Bourguignon;Nathan Lo;Jan Šobotník;David Sillam-Dussès

  • Revisiting Coptotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): a global taxonomic road map for species validity and distribution of an economically important subterranean termite genus

    Thomas Chouvenc;Hou-Feng Li;James Austin;Christian Bordereau

  • Tonsuritermes , a new soldierless termite genus and two new species from South America (Blattaria: Isoptera: Termitidae: Apicotermitinae)

    Joice P. Constantini;Tiago Fernandes Carrijo;Valeria Palma-Onetto;Rudolf Scheffrahn

  • Armoured spiderman: morphological and behavioural adaptations of a specialised araneophagous predator (Araneae: Palpimanidae).

    Stanislav Pekár;Jan Šobotník;Yael Lubin

  • Digestive α-amylases of the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella– adaptation to alkaline environment and plant inhibitors

    Jana Pytelková;Jan Hubert;Martin Lepšík;Jan Šobotník

  • Niche differentiation among neotropical soldierless soil-feeding termites revealed by stable isotope ratios

    Thomas Bourguignon;Jan Šobotník;Gilles Lepoint;Jean Michel Martin

  • Phylogenomic analysis of 589 metagenome-assembled genomes encompassing all major prokaryotic lineages from the gut of higher termites.

    Vincent Hervé;Pengfei Liu;Carsten Dietrich;David Sillam-Dussès

  • Beyond cuticular hydrocarbons: evidence of proteinaceous secretion specific to termite kings and queens

    Robert Hanus;Vladimír Vrkoslav;Ivan Hrdý;Josef Cvačka

  • Genomic data provide insights into the classification of extant termites

    Unknown

  • An introduction to the diversity, ecology and conservation of saproxylic insects.

    Michael D. Ulyshen;Jan Šobotník

  • The Functional Evolution of Termite Gut Microbiota

    Jigyasa Arora;Yukihiro Kinjo;Jan Šobotník;Aleš Buček

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Roisin
Yves Roisin Université Libre de Bruxelles
Nathan Lo
Nathan Lo University of Sydney
Theodore A. Evans
Theodore A. Evans University of Western Australia
Gilles Lepoint
Gilles Lepoint University of Liège
Toru Miura
Toru Miura University of Tokyo
Andreas Brune
Andreas Brune Max Planck Society
Petr Baldrian
Petr Baldrian Czech Academy of Sciences
Stephen L. Cameron
Stephen L. Cameron Purdue University West Lafayette
Aleš Svatoš
Aleš Svatoš Max Planck Society
Nan-Yao Su
Nan-Yao Su University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens up a wide array of career options, many of which can be accessed or advanced through flexible online learning. For those seeking a strong foundation in science careers, earning related credentials—such as from non profit online colleges—can ensure quality education while supporting ethical academic values.

Students with varied backgrounds, including those from nursing or social sciences, often find pathways into environmental or conservation roles. Programs like online bsn programs and social work online master's programs offer the chance to specialize in community health or outreach, which are valuable in public ecology initiatives.

If you're an active service member or veteran looking to transition into environmental careers, there are also resources available. The best military friendly colleges provide support and flexible scheduling to help you reach your academic and career goals in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Šobotník

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles