World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
9605
World Ranking
10021
National Ranking
5278

Michael P. Kaschak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael P. Kaschak sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael P. Kaschak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael P. Kaschak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael P. Kaschak is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects within psychology, arts and humanities, and neuroscience. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, language and linguistics, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their scholarly output is concentrated on topics related to language, discourse, and communication strategies, as well as language, metaphor, and cognition. They also explore the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, speech and dialogue systems, action observation and synchronization, child and animal learning development, and second language acquisition and learning.

Michael P. Kaschak has published in a range of academic venues. Their frequent publication outlets include:

  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Collabra Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Language and Speech

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Gaming experience affects the interpretation of ambiguous words," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Examining the factors that affect structural repetition in question answering," 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • "It's Not You, It's Me: Some Speakers Elicit Structural Priming More Reliably Than Others," 2022, Collabra Psychology
  • "Structural priming in question-answer dialogues," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Collaborations have been a part of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Katherine Chia
  • Michael H. Long
  • Richard D. Morey
  • Antonio M. Díez-Álamo
  • Arthur M. Glenberg

Best Publications

  • Grounding language in action

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Michael P. Kaschak

  • Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension.

    Arthur M. Glenberg;Tiana Gutierrez;Joel R. Levin;Sandra Japuntich

  • Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: how mental simulations serve the animal-culture interface.

    Roy F. Baumeister;E. J. Masicampo

  • Perception of motion affects language processing

    Michael P. Kaschak;Carol J. Madden;David J. Therriault;Richard H. Yaxley

  • Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension.

    Morton Ann Gernsbacher;Michael P. Kaschak

  • Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension

    Michael P Kaschak;Arthur M Glenberg

  • Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories.

    Katinka Dijkstra;Michael P. Kaschak;Rolf A. Zwaan

  • Putting words in perspective.

    Anna M. Borghi;Arthur M. Glenberg;Michael P. Kaschak

  • This construction needs learned.

    Michael P. Kaschak;Arthur M. Glenberg

  • The Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing.

    Kristin L. Borreggine;Michael P. Kaschak

  • Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and individual differences

    Michael P. Kaschak;Timothy J. Kutta;John L. Jones

  • Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week.

    Michael P. Kaschak;Timothy J. Kutta;Christopher Schatschneider

  • Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production

    Michael P. Kaschak

  • The Body's Contribution to Language

    Arthur M Glenberg;Michael P Kaschak

  • Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming

    Michael P. Kaschak;Renrick A. Loney;Kristin L. Borreggine

  • Perception of Auditory Motion Affects Language Processing

    Michael P. Kaschak;Rolf A. Zwaan;Mark E. Aveyard;Richard H. Yaxley

  • Long and Short Term Cumulative Structural Priming Effects.

    Michael P. Kaschak;Timothy J. Kutta;Jacqueline M. Coyle

  • Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses.

    Andrea J. Sell;Michael P. Kaschak

  • Statistical Learning Is Related to Early Literacy-Related Skills.

    Mercedes Spencer;Michael P. Kaschak;John L. Jones;Christopher J. Lonigan

  • A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)

    Richard D. Morey;Michael P. Kaschak;Antonio M. Díez-Álamo;Antonio M. Díez-Álamo;Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg

  • On doing two things at once: Temporal constraints on actions in language comprehension

    Manuel De Vega;David A. Robertson;Arthur M. Glenberg;Michael P. Kaschak

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur M. Glenberg
Arthur M. Glenberg Arizona State University
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Carol McDonald Connor
Carol McDonald Connor University of California, Irvine
Beth M. Phillips
Beth M. Phillips Florida State University
Christopher J. Lonigan
Christopher J. Lonigan Florida State University
Stephanie Al Otaiba
Stephanie Al Otaiba Southern Methodist University
Young-Suk Grace Kim
Young-Suk Grace Kim University of California, Irvine
Jon K. Maner
Jon K. Maner Florida State University
Richard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey Cardiff University
Michael E. J. Masson
Michael E. J. Masson University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a variety of professional pathways, from counseling to research. Many students begin with online psychology degrees, gaining foundational knowledge needed to pursue advanced credentials or licensure. Understanding regional licensing requirements is essential for those who want to practice as therapists in the United States.

For example, those seeking to meet the licensed therapist requirements in Dallas must complete a graduate degree, supervised experience, and pass state-approved exams. Similarly, students interested in Colorado should be aware of the Denver licensed therapist requirements, which include educational standards and specific clinical hours.

In Detroit, aspiring counselors should review the Detroit licensed therapist education requirements, ensuring their programs align with Michigan’s guidelines. Likewise, North Carolina has its own set of standards, so be sure to check out the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Durham.

By staying informed about diverse pathways, students can better prepare for a rewarding career in mental health—wherever they choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Michael P. Kaschak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles