What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Pedagogy
- Social science
- Developmental psychology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Developmental psychology, Mathematics education, Pedagogy, Reading and School teachers.
His study in Developmental psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Vocal pitch, Intonation, Reading aloud and First language.
In the subject of general Mathematics education, his work in Primary education and Educational research is often linked to Initial training, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
His Pedagogy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Australian studies, Aggression and Praise.
His Reading research includes themes of Test, Fluency and Literacy.
Within one scientific family, Kevin Wheldall focuses on topics pertaining to Social psychology under School teachers, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Applied psychology, Reliability and Multiple baseline design.
His most cited work include:
- Differential teacher attention to boys and girls in the classroom (130 citations)
- Teachers' Use of Approval and Disapproval in the Classroom (129 citations)
- An evaluation of Reading Recovery (129 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Mathematics education, Reading, Developmental psychology, Pedagogy and Medical education.
His work on School teachers as part of general Mathematics education study is frequently connected to Curriculum-based measurement, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His Reading research includes elements of Test, Fluency and Literacy.
His research in Pedagogy is mostly concerned with Educational research.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mathematics education (26.19%)
- Reading (25.89%)
- Developmental psychology (16.07%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?
- Reading (25.89%)
- Mathematics education (26.19%)
- Literacy (10.12%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Reading, Mathematics education, Literacy, Medical education and Phonics.
His Reading study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Developmental psychology and Literature.
He works mostly in the field of Developmental psychology, limiting it down to topics relating to Vocabulary and, in certain cases, Intelligence quotient.
Many of his research projects under Mathematics education are closely connected to Evidence-based practice with Evidence-based practice, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
His Literacy study is concerned with the field of Pedagogy as a whole.
The various areas that Kevin Wheldall examines in his Phonics study include Raw score and Fluency.
Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The early years. (57 citations)
- Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The school years (49 citations)
- What Recent Reviews Tell Us About the Efficacy of Reading Interventions for Struggling Readers in the Early Years of Schooling (32 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social science
- Linguistics
- Pedagogy
His main research concerns Reading, Literacy, Developmental psychology, Mathematics education and Phonics.
Kevin Wheldall interconnects Cognitive psychology and Media studies in the investigation of issues within Reading.
His Literacy research is included under the broader classification of Pedagogy.
His Developmental psychology research incorporates themes from Test, Cognition, Phonological awareness, Reading skills and Spelling.
His biological study deals with issues like Special education, which deal with fields such as Reading disability.
His Mathematics education study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Training.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
