World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Mark Chapman publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Chapman sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Mark Chapman D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Chapman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Chapman is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Engineering, and Environmental Science, with a strong emphasis on Geophysics, Environmental Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Ocean Engineering, and Environmental Engineering.

Their scholarly output includes a range of studies on seismic phenomena and geophysical methods, with significant contributions to topics such as seismic waves and analysis, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, methane hydrates and related phenomena, geophysical and geoelectrical methods, CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions, composite material mechanics, and numerical methods in engineering.

Recent publications by Mark Chapman include:

  • Linking elastic and electrical properties of rocks using cross-property DEM, 2021, Geophysical Journal International
  • Multiscale characterisation of chimneys/pipes: Fluid escape structures within sedimentary basins, 2021, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  • The Power-Law Relation Between Inclusion Aspect Ratio and Porosity: Implications for Electrical and Elastic Modeling, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • CO2-Brine Substitution Effects on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation Through Sandstone With Oblique Fractures, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Core-scale geophysical and hydromechanical analysis of seabed sediments affected by CO2 venting, 2021, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Mark Chapman collaborates frequently with several researchers, notably P. Cilli, G. Papageorgiou, A. H. Robinson, Ben Callow, and Gaye Bayrakci, each having coauthored multiple papers alongside Chapman.

Their work is published in several recurrent venues, including:

  • Geophysical Journal International
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Geophysical Prospecting

Best Publications

  • Frequency-dependent anisotropy due to meso-scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity

    Mark Chapman

  • Glacial North Atlantic: Sea-surface conditions reconstructed by GLAMAP 2000

    U. Pflaumann;M. Sarnthein;M. Chapman;L. d'Abreu

  • Millennial-scale oceanic climate variability off the Western Iberian margin during the last two glacial periods

    Lúcia de Abreu;Nicholas J Shackleton;Joachim Schönfeld;Michael Hall

  • The influence of fluid-sensitive dispersion and attenuation on AVO analysis

    Mark Chapman;Enru Liu;Xiang-Yang Li

  • Surface and deep ocean interactions during the cold climate event 8200 years ago.

    Christopher R. W. Ellison;Mark R. Chapman;Ian Robert Hall

  • Derivation of a microstructural poroelastic model

    Mark Chapman;Mark Chapman;Sergei V. Zatsepin;Stuart Crampin;Stuart Crampin

  • Evidence of 550 year and 1000 year cyclicities in North Atlantic circulation patterns during the Holocene

    Mark R. Chapman;Nicholas J. Shackleton

  • Global ice-volume fluctuations, North Atlantic ice-rafting events, and deep-ocean circulation changes between 130 and 70 ka

    Mark R. Chapman;Nicholas J. Shackleton

  • Apparent long-term cooling of the sea surface in the northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean during the Holocene.

    Olivier Marchal;Isabel Cacho;Thomas F. Stocker;Joan O. Grimalt

  • The Classic Marine Isotope Substage 5e

    Nicholas J. Shackleton;Mark Chapman;Maria Fernanda Sánchez-Goñi;Delphine Pailler

  • Modelling frequency-dependent seismic anisotropy in fluid-saturated rock with aligned fractures: implication of fracture size estimation from anisotropic measurements

    Sonja Maultzsch;Mark Chapman;Enru Liu;Xiang Yang Li

  • Changes in sea surface hydrology associated with Heinrich event 4 in the North Atlantic Ocean between 40° and 60°N

    Elsa Cortijo;Laurent Labeyrie;Laurence Vidal;Maryline Vautravers

  • Millennial-scale fluctuations in North Atlantic heat flux during the last 150,000 years

    Mark R. Chapman;Nicholas J. Shackleton

  • Sea surface temperature variability during the last glacial-interglacial cycle: assessing the magnitude and pattern of climate change in the North Atlantic

    Mark R Chapman;Mark R Chapman;Nicholas J Shackleton;Jean-Claude Duplessy

  • Application of spectral decomposition to detection of dispersion anomalies associated with gas saturation

    Emeka Odebeatu;Jinghua Zhang;Mark Chapman;Enru Liu

  • Changes in Meridional Temperature and Salinity Gradients in the North Atlantic Ocean (30°–72°N) during the Last Interglacial Period

    Elsa Cortijo;Scott Lehman;Lloyd Keigwin;Mark Chapman

  • Southern ocean fronts : controlled by wind or topography?

    Robert M. Graham;Robert M. Graham;Agatha M. de Boer;Karen J. Heywood;Mark R. Chapman

  • Faunal and alkenone reconstructions of subtropical North Atlantic surface hydrography and paleotemperature over the last 28 kyr

    M. R. Chapman;N. J. Shackleton;M. Zhao;G. Eglinton

  • The effect of fluid saturation in an anisotropic multi-scale equant porosity model

    Mark Chapman;Sonja Maultzsch;Enru Liu;Xiang-Yang Li

  • Frequency-dependent AVO Inversion

    Adam Wilson;Mark Chapman;Xiang‐Yang Li

  • Modelling and analysis of attenuation anisotropy in multi-azimuth VSP data from the Clair field

    Sonja Maultzsch;Mark Chapman;Enru Liu;Xiang-Yang Li

  • Modeling the effect of multiple sets of mesoscale fractures in porous rock on frequency-dependent anisotropy

    Mark Chapman

  • Experimental verification of the fracture density and shear-wave splitting relationship using synthetic silica cemented sandstones with a controlled fracture geometry.

    Philip Tillotson;Jeremy Sothcott;Angus Ian Best;Mark Chapman;Mark Chapman

  • Unified theory of global flow and squirt flow in cracked porous media

    Morten Jakobsen;Mark Chapman

  • Water saturation effects on elastic wave attenuation in porous rocks with aligned fractures

    Kelvin Amalokwu;Angus I. Best;Jeremy Sothcott;Mark Chapman;Mark Chapman

  • The influence of abnormally high reservoir attenuation on the AVO signature

    Mark Chapman;Enru Liu;Xiang-Yang Li

  • Quantitative gas saturation estimation by frequency-dependent amplitude-versus-offset analysis

    Xiaoyang Wu;Mark Chapman;Mark Chapman;Xiang-Yang Li;Patrick Boston

  • Velocity and attenuation anisotropy Implication of seismic fracture characterizations

    Enru Liu;Mark Chapman;Isabel Varela;Xiangyang Li

  • Observations of fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in synthetic porous rocks with aligned penny‐shaped fractures‡

    Philip Tillotson;Mark Chapman;Angus Ian Best;Jeremy Sothcott

  • A Shale Rock Physics Model and its Application in the Prediction of Brittleness Index, Mineralogy, and Porosity of the Barnett Shale

    Zhiqi Guo;Xiangyang Li;Mark Chapman

  • Observation and analysis of frequency-dependent anisotropy from a multicomponent VSP at Bluebell-Altamont Field, Utah

    E. Liu;J.H. Queen;X.Y. Li;M. Chapman

  • Estimating seismic dispersion from prestack data using frequency-dependent AVO analysis

    Xiaoyang Wu;Mark Chapman;Xiang-Yang Li

  • Exploring the Effect of Fractures and Microstructure on Brittleness Index in the Barnett Shale

    Zhiqi Guo;Xiangyang Li;Mark Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiang-Yang Li
Xiang-Yang Li China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Enru Liu
Enru Liu ExxonMobil (United States)
Angus I. Best
Angus I. Best National Oceanography Centre
Timothy A. Minshull
Timothy A. Minshull University of Southampton
Timothy J. Henstock
Timothy J. Henstock University of Southampton
Jonathan M. Bull
Jonathan M. Bull University of Southampton
Ian Main
Ian Main University of Edinburgh
Stuart Crampin
Stuart Crampin University of Edinburgh
Christian Berndt
Christian Berndt GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Rachael H. James
Rachael H. James University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens up diverse career opportunities, but many students also consider complementary fields to broaden their skills. For those interested in visual documentation and environmental monitoring, pursuing the cheapest online photography degree can be a practical choice. This degree helps develop technical photography skills applicable in scientific research and media roles.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science or related disciplines may find specialized programs helpful. There are excellent options like online degrees incorporating digital photography and language skills, including the online photography bachelor degree for veterans. These programs are designed to support veterans with flexible learning formats and tailored resources.

Language proficiency often enhances career prospects in global or field-based Earth Science roles. Programs such as the spanish online degree offer efficient pathways to fluency. Combining Earth Science knowledge with language skills can be valuable in environmental policy, research, and international projects.

Veterans interested in language acquisition to complement their Earth Science studies may also explore the best online spanish degree programs for veterans, which provide tailored support and flexibility. Together, these related degrees empower students and professionals to expand their expertise and enhance career flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles