World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Redford B. Williams

Redford B. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 89 1001 876 625 535 334 28770
Medicine 88 13140 12368 6705 6201 342 29045

Redford B. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Redford B. Williams between 1965 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Redford B. Williams published across 60 years, from 1965 to 2024, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2004. 1 of the 361 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2004. 1965: 2 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1965 2024

361 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Redford B. Williams: publications per year, 1965 to 2024
Year Publications
1965 2
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 3
1973 6
1974 3
1975 4
1976 0
1977 3
1978 5
1979 3
1980 4
1981 5
1982 5
1983 6
1984 5
1985 7
1986 6
1987 8
1988 10
1989 14
1990 8
1991 4
1992 10
1993 4
1994 10
1995 5
1996 5
1997 11
1998 11
1999 5
2000 8
2001 5
2002 7
2003 8
2004 18
2005 15
2006 7
2007 8
2008 9
2009 6
2010 14
2011 7
2012 9
2013 12
2014 7
2015 9
2016 3
2017 7
2018 4
2019 6
2020 9
2021 6
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 361
Download as CSV

Redford B. Williams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Redford B. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 334 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 334
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Redford B. Williams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Redford B. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83 89
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Redford B. Williams is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, genetics, sociology and political science, molecular biology, and general health professions.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics including cardiac health and mental health, health disparities and outcomes, genetics and physical performance, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, family support in illness, tryptophan and brain disorders, and metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Redford B. Williams include Ilene C. Siegler, Beverly H. Brummett, Michael A. Babyak, Kathleen Mullan Harris, and Cynthia M. Kuhn.

They have published extensively in venues such as UNC Libraries, Metabolomics, Behavior Genetics, Biochemical Genetics, and SAGE Open Nursing.

Recent publications by Redford B. Williams include:

  • Sex and race differences of cerebrospinal fluid metabolites in healthy individuals, 2021, Metabolomics
  • Length Polymorphisms in the Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Gene and the Serotonin-Transporter-Linked Polymorphic Region Constitute a Risk Haplotype for Depression in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease, 2020, Biochemical Genetics
  • Relationship Between Psychosocial Stress and Blood Pressure: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study, 2022, SAGE Open Nursing
  • Evaluating the precision of EBF1 SNP x stress interaction association: sex, race, and age differences in a big harmonized data set of 28,026 participants, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Correction to: Low Life Course Socioeconomic Status (SES) Is Associated with Negative NEO PI-R Personality Patterns, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Best Publications

  • Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes

    Jay Belsky;C. Jonassaint;Michael Pluess;M. Stanton

  • Hostility, CHD incidence, and total mortality: a 25-year follow-up study of 255 physicians.

    John C. Barefoot;W. Grant Dahlstrom;Redford B. Williams

  • The Cook-Medley hostility scale: item content and ability to predict survival.

    J C Barefoot;K A Dodge;B L Peterson;W G Dahlstrom

  • Type A behavior, hostility, and coronary atherosclerosis.

    Redford B Williams;Thomas L. Haney;Kerry L. Lee;Yi-Hong Kong

  • Depression and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease *

    John C Barefoot;Michael J Helms;Daniel B Mark;James A Blumenthal

  • Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease.

    James A. Blumenthal;Matthew M. Burg;John Barefoot;Redford B. Williams

  • Prognostic importance of social and economic resources among medically treated patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease.

    Redford B. Williams;John C. Barefoot;Robert M. Califf;Thomas L. Haney

  • Components of Type A, Hostility, and Anger-In: Relationship to Angiographic Findings

    Theodore M Dembroski;James M. MacDougall;Redford B. Williams;Thomas L. Haney

  • Loss-of-function mutation in tryptophan hydroxylase-2 identified in unipolar major depression.

    Xiaodong Zhang;Raul R. Gainetdinov;Jean-Martin Beaulieu;Tatyana D. Sotnikova

  • Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality.

    Beverly H. Brummett;John C. Barefoot;Ilene C. Siegler;Nancy E. Clapp-Channing

  • Situational determinants of cardiovascular and emotional reactivity in high and low hostile men.

    Edward C. Suarez;Redford B. Williams

  • Type A behavior and elevated physiological and neuroendocrine responses to cognitive tasks.

    Redford B. Williams;James D. Lane;Cynthia M. Kuhn;William Melosh

  • Physiological and psychological variables predict compliance to prescribed exercise therapy in patients recovering from myocardial infarction.

    Blumenthal Ja;Williams Rs;Wallace Ag;Williams Rb

  • Neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and emotional responses of hostile men: the role of interpersonal challenge.

    Edward C. Suarez;Cynthia M. Kuhn;Saul M. Schanberg;Redford B. Williams

  • Hostility during Late Adolescence Predicts Coronary Risk Factors at Mid-Life

    Siegler Ic;Peterson Bl;Barefoot Jc;Williams Rb

  • Depressive symptoms and survival of patients with coronary artery disease.

    John C. Barefoot;Beverly H. Brummett;Michael J. Helms;Daniel B. Mark

  • Effect of Race on Cultural Justifications for Caregiving

    Peggye Dilworth-Anderson;Beverly H. Brummett;Paula Goodwin;Sharon Wallace Williams

  • Hostility patterns and health implications: correlates of Cook-Medley Hostility Scale scores in a national survey.

    Barefoot Jc;Peterson Bl;Dahlstrom Wg;Siegler Ic

  • Serotonin-related gene polymorphisms and central nervous system serotonin function.

    Redford B Williams;Douglas A Marchuk;Kishore M Gadde;John C Barefoot

  • Type A behavior pattern and coronary atherosclerosis.

    J A Blumenthal;R B Williams;Y Kong;S M Schanberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilene C. Siegler
Ilene C. Siegler Duke University
John C. Barefoot
John C. Barefoot Duke University
Beverly H. Brummett
Beverly H. Brummett Duke University
Cynthia M. Kuhn
Cynthia M. Kuhn Duke University
Daniel B. Mark
Daniel B. Mark Duke University
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Richard C. Becker
Richard C. Becker University of Cincinnati
Elizabeth R. Hauser
Elizabeth R. Hauser Duke University
Norman B. Anderson
Norman B. Anderson Florida State University
Allison E. Ashley-Koch
Allison E. Ashley-Koch Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online opens the door to a variety of fulfilling careers, particularly in counseling and therapy. Each state or city has its own set of requirements for becoming a licensed therapist, so it's important to research your preferred location's guidelines early in your studies.

For instance, if you’re considering becoming a licensed therapist in Chula Vista, you'll need to follow specific educational and clinical training standards. Similarly, the licensed therapist requirements in Cincinnati include state-approved degrees and supervised practice hours.

Interested in Ohio? Discover the steps on how to become a licensed therapist in Cleveland for insights tailored to that region. Those exploring opportunities in Colorado can review the Colorado Springs licensed therapist education requirements to better understand the local regulations.

No matter where you choose to practice, online degrees can provide the flexibility needed to start your journey. Always verify local requirements to ensure your education aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Redford B. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles