World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
75
Citations
13298
World Ranking
1913
National Ranking
20

Thomas Rosenberg publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 185 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Thomas Rosenberg D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Rosenberg is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the life sciences, with a primary focus on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these broad fields, their work is further specialized in Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, and Genetics, alongside interests in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

Their scientific contributions predominantly revolve around retinal biology and associated disorders. Key topics addressed in their research include Retinal Development and Disorders, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, RNA regulation and disease mechanisms, Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Connective tissue disorders research, interferon and immune responses, as well as Connexins and lens biology.

Thomas Rosenberg has authored multiple papers published in reputable scientific journals. Among recent publications are:

  • Comprehensive variant spectrum of the CNGA3 gene in patients affected by achromatopsia, 2022, Human Mutation
  • Clinical Phenotype and Course of PDE6A-Associated Retinitis Pigmentosa Disease, Characterized in Preparation for a Gene Supplementation Trial, 2020, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • The landscape of submicroscopic structural variants at the OPN1LW/OPN1MW gene cluster on Xq28 underlying blue cone monochromacy, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • A Missense Mutation in RAB28 in a Family with Cone-Rod Dystrophy and Postaxial Polydactyly Prevents Localization of RAB28 to the Primary Cilium, 2020, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Oliver McFarlane syndrome: two new cases and a review of the literature, 2021, Ophthalmic Genetics

Frequent co-authors working alongside Thomas Rosenberg include:

  • Line Kessel
  • Cathrine Jespersgaard
  • Mette Bertelsen
  • Karen Grønskov
  • Sten Andréasson

Their work appears in several distinguished publication venues such as Human Mutation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, JAMA Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, and Genes. This range reflects both a concentration on genetic and molecular aspects as well as clinical and ophthalmological contexts.

Best Publications

  • Positional cloning of the gene for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa 2

    U. Schwahn;S. Lenzner;J Dong;S. Feil

  • CNGA3 Mutations in Hereditary Cone Photoreceptor Disorders

    Bernd Wissinger;Daphne Gamer;Herbert Jägle;Roberto Giorda

  • Heterozygous missense mutation in the rod cGMP phosphodiesterase β-subunit gene in autosomal dominant stationary night blindness

    Andreas Gal;Ulrike Orth;Wolfgang Baehr;Eberhard Schwinger

  • Mutations in HPRP3, a third member of pre-mRNA splicing factor genes, implicated in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa

    Christina F Chakarova;Matthew M Hims;Hanno Jörn Bolz;Leen Abu-Safieh

  • Mutations in the Cone Photoreceptor G-Protein α-Subunit Gene GNAT2 in Patients with Achromatopsia

    Susanne Kohl;Britta Baumann;Thomas Rosenberg;Ulrich Kellner

  • Functional implications of the spectrum of mutations found in 234 cases with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis (XLRS)

    J.T. Dendunnen;T. Kraayenbrink;T. Kraayenbrink;M. van Schooneveld;M. van Schooneveld;E. van de Vosse

  • CNGB3 mutations account for 50% of all cases with autosomal recessive achromatopsia

    Susanne Kohl;Balazs Varsanyi;Balazs Varsanyi;Gesine Abadin Antunes;Britta Baumann

  • Mutations of FBN1 and genotype-phenotype correlations in Marfan syndrome and related fibrillinopathies.

    Peter N. Robinson;Patrick Booms;Stefanie Katzke;Markus Ladewig

  • Increasing the complexity: new genes and new types of albinism

    Lluís Montoliu;Karen Grønskov;Karen Grønskov;Ai-Hua Wei;Mónica Martínez-García

  • The prevalence of Usher syndrome and other retinal dystrophy-hearing impairment associations.

    Thomas Rosenberg;Marianne Haim;Anne-Marie Hauch;Agnete Parving

  • Positional cloning of the gene for x-linked retinitis pigmentosa 3: homology with the guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor RCC1

    R. Roepman;G. Van Duijnhoven;T. Rosenberg;A. J. L. G. Pinckers

  • Dominant optic atrophy mapped to chromosome 3q region. II. Clinical and epidemiological aspects.

    Birgit Kjer;Hans Eiberg;Poul Kjer;Thomas Rosenberg

  • Classic, atypically severe and neonatal Marfan syndrome: twelve mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in FBN1 exons 24-40.

    Frank Tiecke;Stefanie Katzke;Patrick Booms;Peter N. Robinson

  • RPGR Transcription Studies in Mouse and Human Tissues Reveal a Retina-Specific Isoform That Is Disrupted in a Patient With X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa

    Renate Kirschner;Thomas Rosenberg;Robert Schultz-Heienbrok;Steffen Lenzner

  • A nationwide Danish study of 1027 cases of congenital/infantile cataracts: etiological and clinical classifications.

    Birgitte Haargaard;Jan Wohlfahrt;Hans C. Fledelius;Thomas Rosenberg

  • Dominant optic atrophy (OPA1) mapped to chromosome 3q region. I. Linkage analysis

    Hans Eiberg;Birgit Kjer;Poul Kjer;Thomas Rosenberg

  • Linkage mapping in 29 Bardet-Biedl syndrome families confirms loci in chromosomal regions 11q13, 15q22.3-q23, and 16q21.

    E.A. Bruford;R. Riise;P.W. Teague;K. Porter

  • Genetic heterogeneity in microcornea-cataract: five novel mutations in CRYAA, CRYGD, and GJA8.

    Lars Hansen;Wenliang Yao;Hans Eiberg;Klaus Wilbrandt Kjaer

  • Population-based risk estimates of Wilms tumor in sporadic aniridia. A comprehensive mutation screening procedure of PAX6 identifies 80% of mutations in aniridia.

    Karen Grønskov;Jørgen H. Olsen;Annie Sand;Winni Pedersen

  • Stickler syndrome caused by COL2A1 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlation in a series of 100 patients.

    Kristien P Hoornaert;Inge Vereecke;Chantal Dewinter;Thomas Rosenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Eiberg
Hans Eiberg University of Copenhagen
Marianne Schwartz
Marianne Schwartz University of Copenhagen
Susanne Kohl
Susanne Kohl University of Tübingen
Karen Brøndum-Nielsen
Karen Brøndum-Nielsen Copenhagen University Hospital
Frans P.M. Cremers
Frans P.M. Cremers Radboud University
Bernd Wissinger
Bernd Wissinger University of Tübingen
Andreas Gal
Andreas Gal Universität Hamburg
Terri L. Young
Terri L. Young University of Wisconsin–Madison
Anthony T. Moore
Anthony T. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Birgit Lorenz
Birgit Lorenz University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Genetics can open doors to diverse healthcare professions and advanced educational opportunities. Many related healthcare roles now offer flexible online pathways, allowing students to upskill or change careers efficiently.

For those with a nursing background, programs like the rn to bsn online with no clinicals present a practical option to earn a bachelor’s degree without attending on-campus clinicals. Similarly, nurses aiming for leadership can complete an advanced degree with a 1 year msn to dnp program online, accelerating their pathway to practice.

Those interested in gaining quick entry into the healthcare field may consider a certified medical assistant program, which offers training in weeks, not years. For doctorate-level study, many students look for cost-effective options, such as the cheapest dnp programs available online.

Whether your goal is direct patient care or advancing into research and leadership, these online programs can complement a background in genetics or provide new, flexible career pathways in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Rosenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles