World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
6961
World Ranking
7115
National Ranking
260

Wayne S. Meyer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne S. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Wayne S. Meyer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne S. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wayne S. Meyer is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with 24 publications in this field.

The scientist's work extensively covers subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Ecological Modeling, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Key topics addressed in Meyer's research include:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Tree-ring climate responses

Meyer has contributed to several research papers published in notable scientific venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Termite sensitivity to temperature affects global wood decay rates" (2022) in Science
  • "Bridge to the future: Important lessons from 20 years of ecosystem observations made by the OzFlux network" (2022) in Global Change Biology
  • "The role of aerodynamic resistance in thermal remote sensing-based evapotranspiration models" (2021) in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Land surface phenology retrievals for arid and semi-arid ecosystems" (2022) in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "Rapid recovery of net ecosystem production in a semi-arid woodland after a wildfire" (2020) in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Frequent co-authors include Jason Beringer, James Cleverly, Nina Hinko-Najera, Richard Silberstein, and William Woodgate. These collaborations contribute to a broader understanding within environmental and ecological research contexts.

Publication venues where Meyer has been frequently published are:

  • Global Change Biology
  • Science
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand flux tower network - OzFlux

    Jason Beringer;Lindsay B Hutley;Ian McHugh;Stefan K Arndt

  • The resource potential of in-situ shallow ground water use in irrigated agriculture: a review

    J. E. Ayars;E. W. Christen;R. W. Soppe;W. S. Meyer

  • Species vulnerability to climate change: impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation

    David M Summers;Brett A Bryan;Neville D Crossman;Waynes S Meyer

  • Termite sensitivity to temperature affects global wood decay rates

    Unknown

  • Landscape futures analysis: Assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios

    Brett A. Bryan;Neville D. Crossman;Darran King;Wayne S. Meyer

  • Future landscapes: managing within complexity

    Lael Parrott;Wayne S Meyer

  • Water Use by Wheat and Plant Indicators of Available Soil Water1

    Wayne S. Meyer;George C. Green

  • Drought rapidly diminishes the large net CO2 uptake in 2011 over semi-arid Australia.

    Xuanlong Ma;Alfredo Huete;James Cleverly;Derek Eamus

  • Soil–water and solute movement under precision irrigation: knowledge gaps for managing sustainable root zones

    S R Raine;S R Raine;W S Meyer;W S Meyer;David Rassam;John Leslie Hutson

  • Assessing SWAT models based on single and multi-site calibration for the simulation of flow and nutrient loads in the semi-arid Onkaparinga catchment in South Australia

    Manoj Kumar Shrestha;Friedrich Recknagel;Jacqueline Frizenschaf;Wayne Meyer

  • Plant Indicators of Wheat and Soybean Crop Water Stress

    W. S. Meyer;G. C. Green

  • Growth and ground water uptake responses of lucerne to changes in groundwater levels and salinity: lysimeter, isotope and modelling studies

    L. Zhang;W.R. Dawes;P.G. Slavich;W.S. Meyer

  • Brave new green world - Consequences of a carbon economy for the conservation of Australian biodiversity

    Corey J A Bradshaw;Corey J A Bradshaw;David Mjs Bowman;Nicholas Restall Bond;Brett P Murphy;Brett P Murphy

  • Real options analysis for land use management: Methods, application, and implications for policy.

    Courtney M. Regan;Brett A. Bryan;Jeffery D. Connor;Wayne S. Meyer

  • The Australian SuperSite Network: A continental, long-term terrestrial ecosystem observatory.

    Mirko Karan;Michael Liddell;Suzanne M Prober;Stefan Arndt

  • Resistance to water flow in the sorghum plant.

    Wayne S. Meyer;Joe T. Ritchie

  • Waterlogging in Australian agricultural landscapes: a review of plant responses and crop models

    Ruth E. Shaw;Wayne S. Meyer;Ann McNeill;Stephen D. Tyerman

  • Leaflet Orientation in Water-stressed Soybeans1

    Wayne S. Meyer;Sue Walker

  • Water Use, Foliage Temperature and Yield of Irrigated Wheat in South-eastern Australia

    J. L. Steiner;R. C. G. Smith;W. S. Meyer;J. A. Adeney

  • Effect of irrigation on soil oxygen status and root and shoot growth of wheat in a clay soil

    W. S. Meyer;H. D. Barrs;R. C. G. Smith;N. S. White

  • Estimates of deep percolation beneath cotton in the Macquarie Valley

    T. M. Willis;A. S. Black;Wayne S. Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

James Cleverly
James Cleverly James Cook University
Brett A. Bryan
Brett A. Bryan Deakin University
Jason Beringer
Jason Beringer University of Western Australia
Derek Eamus
Derek Eamus University of Technology Sydney
Lindsay B. Hutley
Lindsay B. Hutley Charles Darwin University
Stefan K. Arndt
Stefan K. Arndt University of Melbourne
Petra Marschner
Petra Marschner University of Adelaide
Eva van Gorsel
Eva van Gorsel Australian National University
Elise Pendall
Elise Pendall Western Sydney University
Suzanne M. Prober
Suzanne M. Prober Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career options. Many students consider complementary degrees to broaden their expertise. For instance, pursuing an cheapest dsw program can be an excellent choice for those interested in integrating social work with environmental policy and community advocacy.

For those seeking flexible and budget-friendly education paths, online options like a low cost online general studies degree provide a broad foundation that can be tailored toward environmental issues. These programs allow students to customize their coursework based on their interests and career goals.

If the goal is to obtain a degree efficiently, exploring the easy bachelor's degree options may be appealing. Such programs often feature streamlined curricula that help students complete their education faster while still gaining valuable skills applicable to environmental fields.

Additionally, specialized degrees like online geology degrees are ideal for those focused on earth sciences, offering targeted training in geoscience techniques and environmental analysis. This knowledge is crucial for careers in resource management and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne S. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles