World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6677 6409 245 238 78 8688

Eva van Gorsel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eva van Gorsel between 1998 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eva van Gorsel published across 24 years, from 1998 to 2021, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2016. 3 of the 78 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2016. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication
1998 2021

78 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eva van Gorsel: publications per year, 1998 to 2021
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 8
2008 1
2009 5
2010 2
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 5
2015 6
2016 15
2017 4
2018 2
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
Total 78
Download as CSV

Eva van Gorsel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva van Gorsel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257 78
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Eva van Gorsel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva van Gorsel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Eva van Gorsel is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with specific interests in the subfields of Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecological Modeling.

Their work covers main topics such as Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Species Distribution and Climate Change.

Van Gorsel has coauthored publications with several researchers including William Woodgate, Dale Hughes, Lola Suárez, José A. Jiménez-Berni, and Alex Held.

They have contributed to the publication venue Plant Methods, with documented publications in this journal.

A recent publication includes the paper THEMS: an automated thermal and hyperspectral proximal sensing system for canopy reflectance, radiance and temperature, published in 2020 in Plant Methods. This paper has received citations in the field, reflecting its integration into related research.

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: The role of landscape-scale heterogeneity

    Paul C. Stoy;Matthias Mauder;Thomas Foken;Barbara Marcolla

  • Reflections on the surface energy imbalance problem

    Ray Leuning;Eva van Gorsel;William J Massman;Peter Robert Isaac

  • Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled-process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1 km to global scales

    Youngryel Ryu;Youngryel Ryu;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Hideki Kobayashi;Catharine van Ingen

  • The energy balance experiment EBEX-2000. Part I: Overview and energy balance

    Steven P. Oncley;Thomas Foken;Roland Vogt;Wim Kohsiek

  • An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand flux tower network - OzFlux

    Jason Beringer;Lindsay B Hutley;Ian McHugh;Stefan K Arndt

  • Impacts of droughts and extreme-temperature events on gross primary production and ecosystem respiration: a systematic assessment across ecosystems and climate zones

    Jannis von Buttlar;Jannis von Buttlar;Jakob Zscheischler;Jakob Zscheischler;Anja Rammig;Sebastian Sippel

  • Diagnosing errors in a land surface model (CABLE) in the time and frequency domains

    Ying Ping Wang;Eva Kowalczyk;Ray Leuning;Gab Abramowitz

  • Direct advection measurements do not help to solve the night-time CO2 closure problem: Evidence from three different forests

    Marc Aubinet;Christian Feigenwinter;Christian Feigenwinter;Bernard Heinesch;C. Bernhofer

  • Rainfall interception and the coupled surface water and energy balance

    Albert I.J.M. van Dijk;John H. Gash;Eva van Gorsel;Peter D. Blanken

  • OzFlux data: network integration from collection to curation

    Peter Isaac;James R Cleverly;Ian McHugh;Eva van Gorsel

  • Nocturnal carbon efflux: reconciliation of eddy covariance and chamber measurements using an alternative to the u * -threshold filtering technique

    Eva Van Gorsel;Ray Leuning;Helen A. Cleugh;Heather Keith

  • Multiple observation types reduce uncertainty in Australia's terrestrial carbon and water cycles

    V. Haverd;M. R. Raupach;P. R. Briggs;J. G. Canadell

  • Sensitivity of Land Surface Simulations to Model Physics, Land Characteristics, and Forcings, at Four CEOP Sites

    Hiroko Kato;Hiroko Kato;Matthew Rodell;Frank Beyrich;Helen Cleugh

  • Estimating nocturnal ecosystem respiration from the vertical turbulent flux and change in storage of CO2

    Eva van Gorsel;Nicolas Delpierre;Ray Leuning;Andy Black

  • Surface radiation budget in an Alpine valley

    N. Matzinger;M. Andretta;E. Van Gorsel;R. Vogt

  • Turbulence Structure and Exchange Processes in an Alpine Valley: The Riviera Project

    Mathias W. Rotach;Pierluigi Calanca;Giovanni Graziani;Joachim Gurtz

  • Reviews and syntheses: Australian vegetation phenology: new insights from satellite remote sensing and digital repeat photography

    Caitlin E. Moore;Caitlin E. Moore;Tim Brown;Trevor F. Keenan;Trevor F. Keenan;Remko A. Duursma

  • Vegetation height and cover fraction between 60° S and 60° N from ICESat GLAS data

    S. O. Los;J. A. B. Rosette;J. A. B. Rosette;N. Kljun;P. R. J. North

  • Coherent structures in urban roughness sublayer turbulence

    Andreas Christen;Eva van Gorsel;Roland Vogt

  • Effect of spatial sampling from European flux towers for estimating carbon and water fluxes with artificial neural networks

    Dario Papale;T. Andrew Black;Nuno Carvalhais;Alessandro Cescatti

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason Beringer
Jason Beringer University of Western Australia
Ray Leuning
Ray Leuning CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Lindsay B. Hutley
Lindsay B. Hutley Charles Darwin University
James Cleverly
James Cleverly James Cook University
Derek Eamus
Derek Eamus University of Technology Sydney
Vanessa Haverd
Vanessa Haverd Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Alfredo Huete
Alfredo Huete University of Technology Sydney
Natascha Kljun
Natascha Kljun Lund University
Natalia Restrepo-Coupe
Natalia Restrepo-Coupe University of Technology Sydney
Stefan K. Arndt
Stefan K. Arndt University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many professionals in this field complement their scientific expertise with public administration skills by enrolling in online MPA degrees. These programs equip graduates with the knowledge needed to influence environmental policies and lead sustainable initiatives effectively.

Understanding societal dynamics is also crucial in environmental work. Earning an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into human behavior, community engagement, and social impacts of environmental decisions.

For those seeking advanced expertise without the traditional challenges of dissertation requirements, doctorate degree online no dissertation programs offer flexible paths to doctoral credentials. These options are particularly appealing for environmental professionals aiming to deepen their leadership and research skills.

If you already hold an education specialist degree, consider seamless progression through eds to edd programs online. This pathway helps educators and environmental trainers advance their careers by enhancing their expertise in curriculum development and environmental education leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Eva van Gorsel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles