World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4170 3851 246 234 160 7503

Brent Swallow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brent Swallow between 1984 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brent Swallow published across 40 years, from 1984 to 2023, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1999. 9 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 1999. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications
1984 2023

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brent Swallow: publications per year, 1984 to 2023
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 5
1987 4
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 3
1995 6
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 13
2000 4
2001 4
2002 10
2003 6
2004 2
2005 8
2006 7
2007 10
2008 9
2009 7
2010 3
2011 5
2012 3
2013 6
2014 3
2015 4
2016 6
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 1
2021 5
2022 6
2023 3
Total 167
Download as CSV

Brent Swallow publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brent Swallow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 160
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Brent Swallow D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brent Swallow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Brent Swallow is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their publications primarily focus on complex interactions between natural resource management, economic development, and policy frameworks.

The scientist's work spans several key fields of study, including:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Subfields of particular emphasis in Brent Swallow's research include:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Insect Science
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

The scholar's main topics of work encompass:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Urban Green Space and Health

Among recent academic publications are:

  • "Coupling coordination analysis of China's water resources utilization efficiency and economic development level," 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data," 2020, Forest Policy and Economics
  • "Identifying the effects of a land-use policy on willingness to pay for open space using an endogenous switching regression model," 2021, Land Use Policy
  • "Co-management for sustainable development and conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Park and the surrounding Tibetan nomadic pastoralist areas," 2023, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "An insight into the drag effect of water, land, and energy on economic growth across space and time: the application of improved Solow growth model," 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Frequent co-authors who collaborate with Brent Swallow include:

  • Salla Rantala
  • Riikka Paloniemi
  • Feng Qiu
  • Ting Ma
  • Linsheng Zhong

Publication venues where Brent Swallow's research has appeared include:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Forest Policy and Economics
  • Land Use Policy
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie

Best Publications

  • Fractal Poverty Traps

    Christopher B. Barrett;Brent M. Swallow

  • MEASURING THE COSTS OF AFRICAN ANIMAL TRYPANOSOMOSIS, THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF CONTROL AND RETURNS TO RESEARCH

    Patricia M. Kristjanson;B.M. Swallow;G.J. Rowlands;R.L. Kruska

  • Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges

    Rohit Jindal;Brent Swallow;John Kerr

  • Impacts of trypanosomiasis on African agriculture.

    B.M. Swallow

  • Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services in the Developing World: Framing Pan-Tropical Analysis and Comparison

    Brent M. Swallow;Mikkel F. Kallesoe;Usman A. Iftikhar;Meine van Noordwijk

  • Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities

    Gillian A. Cerbu;Brent M. Swallow;Dara Y. Thompson

  • Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa

    Brent M. Swallow;Joseph K. Sang;Joseph K. Sang;Meshack Nyabenge;Daniel K. Bundotich

  • Invasion of prosopis juliflora and local livelihoods: case study from the Lake Baringo area of Kenya

    Emmanuel Mwangi;Brent Swallow

  • The effects of scales, flows and filters on property rights and collective action in watershed management

    Brent M. Swallow;Dennis P. Garrity;Meine van Noordwijk

  • Using conjoint analysis to estimate farmer's preferences for cattle traits in West Africa

    Kouadio Tano;Mulumba Kamuanga;Merle D. Faminow;Brent Swallow

  • Prosopis juliflora Invasion and Rural Livelihoods in the Lake Baringo Area of Kenya

    Esther Mwangi;Brent Swallow

  • Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: : An assessment of payment approaches

    David Kaczan;Brent M. Swallow;W.L. (Vic) Adamowicz

  • Managing mobility in African rangelands.

    M. Niamir-Fuller;N. McCarthy;B. Swallow;M. Kirk

  • Innovation in natural resource management: The role of property rights and collective action in developing countries

    Ruth Meinzen-Dick;Anna Knox;Frank Place;Brent Swallow

  • Institutions, governance and incentives in common property regimes for African rangelands

    Brent M. Swallow;Daniel W. Bromley

  • Can community gardens and farmers' markets relieve food desert problems? A study of Edmonton, Canada

    Haoluan Wang;Feng Qiu;Brent Swallow

  • The Policy Terrain in Protected Area Landscapes: Challenges for Agroforestry in Integrated Landscape Conservation

    Rebecca Ashley;Diane Russell;Brent Swallow

  • Evaluating willingness to contribute to a local public good: Application of contingent valuation to tsetse control in Ethiopia

    B.M. Swallow;M. Woudyalew

  • Property rights, risk, and livestock development in Africa

    N. McCarthy;B. Swallow;M. Kirk;P. Hazell

  • Property Rights, Collective Action, and Poverty: The Role of Institutions for Poverty Reduction

    Monica di Gregorio;Konrad Hagedorn;Michael Kirk;Benedikt Korf

  • A conjoint analysis of farmer preferences for community forestry contracts in the Sumber Jaya Watershed, Indonesia.

    Bustanul Arifin;Brent M. Swallow;S. Suyanto;Richard D. Coe

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth Meinzen-Dick
Ruth Meinzen-Dick International Food Policy Research Institute
Meine van Noordwijk
Meine van Noordwijk World Agroforestry Centre
Peter B. R. Hazell
Peter B. R. Hazell Imperial College London
Wiktor L. Adamowicz
Wiktor L. Adamowicz University of Alberta
Christopher B. Barrett
Christopher B. Barrett Cornell University
Daniel W. Bromley
Daniel W. Bromley University of Wisconsin–Madison
Louis V. Verchot
Louis V. Verchot Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Benedikt Korf
Benedikt Korf University of Zurich
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
M. van Noordwijk
M. van Noordwijk World Agroforestry Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career and academic pathways. Many students now choose online programs for flexibility, cost savings, and accelerated learning options. For example, those interested in social work can gain advanced credentials through 1 year msw programs online no bsw, designed for fast-track entry without a prior Bachelor of Social Work.

Psychology remains one of the most popular fields, and accelerated psychology degree programs allow students to complete their studies faster and start meaningful careers sooner. Aspiring counselors can benefit from cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online, ensuring their qualifications are recognized while keeping tuition manageable.

For those focused on relationships and family well-being, specialist mft programs combine affordability and quality, preparing graduates for licensure and rewarding therapy roles. Whether you aim to advance your education or transition careers, these online degree choices offer accessible and accredited routes toward your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Brent Swallow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles